Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why are liberal cities bad for blacks? The answer is sitting right in front of them
American Thinker ^ | 04/10/2014 | Rick Moran

Posted on 04/10/2014 8:07:26 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

That's the title of a Bloomberg op-ed by Francis Wilkinson, who examined statistics from a report by the National Urban League about income inequality between blacks and whites in America.

Minneapolis-St. Paul. San Francisco. Chicago. Even Madison, Wisconsin. If you are politically liberal and value relatively high levels of income equality, you might live in one of these quintessentially liberal U.S. cities. Yet all four lurk in the bottom half of the 2014 National Urban League's State of Black America report on income inequality between blacks and whites. Among the many places where black-white income is less skewed are Phoenix, Arizona, Nashville, Tennessee and Columbia, South Carolina.

Nationally, blacks and Hispanics earn less than whites and generally have higher rates of unemployment. But there are significant regional variations. And looking at the Urban League rankings, I couldn't help noticing how many northern liberal cities fared poorly on the racial equality index.

The inequality is sometimes intense. According to 2005-2009 data based on the U.S. Census American Community Survey, which was provided to me by John Logan, a demographer at Brown University, the San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City metropolitan area has an astonishing $56,000 white-black gap in household median income. The white-black gap in the Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington metro area is about $40,000.

There is no definitive cause, and explanations vary. Mathew Kahn, an economist at UCLA, e-mailed, "Educated liberals are tolerant people who are willing to live in racially integrated areas even if the minority neighbors are poor. Such liberals are more willing to vote for redistributionist policies and this may attract poor people to collect such transfers."

For an extreme example of rich and poor living cheek-by-jowl, consider New York's 14th congressional district, on Manhattan's Upper East Side.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blacks; cities; liberalcities; liberalism; liberalstupidity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 04/10/2014 8:07:26 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m sorry, but let me state the unpleasant truth: Liberal cities are bad for blacks because they are full of liberals and full of blacks.

Some animals simply ARE more equal than others.


2 posted on 04/10/2014 8:13:25 AM PDT by dagogo redux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Educated liberals are tolerant, so says a UCLA economist. I agree with Harry Truman. They’re all over educated s.o.b.’s.


3 posted on 04/10/2014 8:18:17 AM PDT by VerySadAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Great article. Thanks for posting. I am following the Illinois gubernatorial race. Bruce Rauner has got the support of the Rev. James Meeks, Chicago pol who is a Obama/Jesse Jackson guy politically, but thinks independently occasionally.


4 posted on 04/10/2014 8:18:34 AM PDT by madameguinot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"Educated liberals are tolerant people who are willing to live in racially integrated areas even if the minority neighbors are poor.

Uuummmmmm No. Liberals are all for Diversity, only if it for other people. For their gated community or the private school they send their kids, not so much.

5 posted on 04/10/2014 8:21:20 AM PDT by qam1 (There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

High minded liberals tend to live in poorer neighborhoods
because they can buy BIGGER houses.
When people in these neighborhoods talk about
“gentrification” they are talking about liberals
buying up cheap property and raising their value
to the point the poor can’t live there any more.


6 posted on 04/10/2014 8:23:20 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dagogo redux
I’m sorry, but let me state the unpleasant truth: Liberal cities are bad for blacks because they are full of liberals and full of blacks.

You're right. Those types of cities drive out the conservative white middle class while shielding white liberal elites.

Eventually it's a small group of white liberal elites surrounded by a sea of poor underclass desperate and angry blacks.

Liberal Elites in theses cities live in security-rich towers protected by legions of 'rent a cops'. Blacks in these cities prop up the elites based on bullshit promises that never come true - but will NEXT TIME if only all the blacks vote as a bloc for Democrats.... It's a sick system... very South American banana republic stuff.

7 posted on 04/10/2014 8:23:56 AM PDT by GOPJ (When fascism comes it will come..with promises of a better world.The jackboots come later..-Shapiro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

African-Americans are simply adrift & lost at sea!!! They do not have a clue. They worship and follow false leaders and would be Gods!!! And.....please do not tell me they are Christians.....most of them worship and kneel at the altar of secular, anti-God & religion, failed, POTUS Obama!!!


8 posted on 04/10/2014 8:25:50 AM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX ( My only objective is to defeat and destroy Obama & his Democrat Party, politically!!!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Mathew Kahn, an economist at UCLA, e-mailed, "Educated liberals are tolerant people who are willing to live in racially integrated areas even if the minority neighbors are poor. Such liberals are more willing to vote for redistributionist policies and this may attract poor people to collect such transfers."

Wow. What a remarkably arrogant, patronizing statement. Liberals are oh so "tolerant", aren't they? Actually, no, liberals are NOT tolerant people, nor are they charitable, nor are they in any way interested in fairness and equality in any way that actually makes sense.

9 posted on 04/10/2014 8:25:52 AM PDT by Sicon ("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Liberal whites know they’re racists. How do they deflect that? Alinsky tactics; whatever you are guilty of claim the other side is guilty of it first. And never let up.


10 posted on 04/10/2014 8:29:21 AM PDT by ryan71 (The Partisans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Mathew Kahn, an economist at UCLA, e-mailed, “Educated liberals are tolerant people who are willing to live in racially integrated areas even if the minority neighbors are poor. Such liberals are more willing to vote for redistributionist policies and this may attract poor people to collect such transfers.” Such liberals are more willing to vote for redistributionist policies and this may attract poor people to collect such transfers.”


Part of this just leaps out at me the >> “Educated liberals are tolerant people who are willing to live in racially integrated areas even if the minority neighbors are poor.”<< is nothing more than often repeated Bullhockey. My life’s experience has shown me that the opposite is much more true. Educated Liberals are more likely to live in segregated communities that actively work to keep poor minorities as far away from them as possible.

Yes there will be some poor minorities in the area so that they can look upon them and say “I feel for you!” and thus satisfy themselves that they are good people after all.


11 posted on 04/10/2014 8:30:26 AM PDT by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Nationally, blacks and Hispanics earn less than whites and generally have higher rates of unemployment…There is no definitive cause..

That argument mixes cause and effect.
Whatever, if I were black or brown I might start by testing the concept:

I would say, “Nationally, whites earn more than blacks and browns and generally have lower rates of unemployment and ask myself, why is that?”

I would notice there are and have been many successful and rich blacks and browns and ask myself, what did they do differently than those consistently in the unemployed ranks or those on public assistance?

And then, if it was “too late” for me, I would examine the lifestyle of my children to see what changes might improve their future.

At this point, some would offer: “Or you could vote Democrat and remain on the plantation”.

12 posted on 04/10/2014 8:30:41 AM PDT by frog in a pot (We are all "frogs in a pot" now. How and when will we real Americans jump out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Wealthy Silicon Valley Liberals, in concert with the local government in San Francisco, have essentially driven the poor Blacks out of the city. All the city-owned housing along the waterfront south of the Bay Bridge has been raised to make room for luxury living space for the Libs.


13 posted on 04/10/2014 8:35:28 AM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

In 2004 I visited my home town of Minneapolis. I drove to where my uncle said he had once lived in the 1940’s (he is in Los Angeles now). He wanted a photo so I went over there and was shocked as I drove around the blocks in the area all the black men & women sitting on the front porch or the stairs out front in the middle of a work day. I had not seen it before. I had been away since the 1980’s. I still see the same names in politics now as I did then. Very few at the top ruin the lives of the many for their own personal gain.


14 posted on 04/10/2014 8:36:47 AM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68

You’ve hit the nail on the head so to say.

Blacks are being chased out of SF.Hunters Point -Bay View is loosing their black population.

And now they are complaining about the gentrification of the Mission District in SF,which was originally Irish,then became Latino.News the other day was 1700 Latino’s left and over 2000 whites moved in to the Mission.
I thought whites were out numbered in Ca????


15 posted on 04/10/2014 8:43:22 AM PDT by peteyd (A dog may bite you in the ass,but it will never stab you in the back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sicon
Such liberals are more willing to vote for redistributionist...

Such "liberals" who itemize and take even one tax deduction are hypocrites. Ditto any homestead exemptions. "Liberals" who live off of/shelter their money in Foundations/investments are hypocrites. Also "liberals" who are unwilling to donate all their discretionary income to the US Treasury are a bunch of phony frauds and hypocrites as well.

When it comes to self-righteous collectivists, only the highest standards should be expected.
16 posted on 04/10/2014 8:43:52 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

“Eventually it’s a small group of white liberal elites surrounded by a sea of poor underclass desperate and angry blacks. Liberal Elites in theses cities live in security-rich towers protected by legions of ‘rent a cops’. Blacks in these cities prop up the elites based on bullshit promises that never come true - but will NEXT TIME if only all the blacks vote as a bloc for Democrats.... It’s a sick system... very South American banana republic stuff.”

Here in NJ the white liberals making millions in the “poverty industry” don’t even live in the cities (there are no “safe” places there). They commute there, making sure they are out by sunset. Darker players in the poverty sector set up residency laws and such (to get their own on the gravy train), but they themselves skirt the regulations by living outside the cities as well. My town, as part of an “NACCP settlement”, must open its civil service positions to Newark residents while Newark can require residency for its applicants.

In the end, they simply run out of “other peoples’ money”, and it isn’t just taxpayers fleeing. Companies that were forced to house, school, clothe, and feed millions of gibsmedats are simply leaving; that is why NJ is lagging behind most other states by any measure of economic health. While ethnically NJ is similar to the country as a whole, our gubmint worker class (still primarily white libs) is huge and VERY costly.


17 posted on 04/10/2014 10:57:36 AM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kearnyirish2

It appears government workers know how to keep the pump primed for their own benefit.

Considering the Lois Lerner horror - it’s time to rethink civil service. Protecting the jobs of biased sycophants was NOT the original idea... in fact that’s what the law was trying to safeguard us from...


18 posted on 04/10/2014 11:16:52 AM PDT by GOPJ (When fascism comes it will come..with promises of a better world.The jackboots come later..-Shapiro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tet68

“High minded liberals tend to live in poorer neighborhoods
because they can buy BIGGER houses.
When people in these neighborhoods talk about
“gentrification” they are talking about liberals
buying up cheap property and raising their value
to the point the poor can’t live there any more.”

High-minded liberals don’t live in poorer neighborhoods; they might move into a FORMER poor neighborhood after it has been ethnically cleansed (gentrified), but they don’t risk their cowardly butts in those neighborhoods while they are “poor”. Years ago Asbury Park NJ was supposed to be staging a comeback, trying to sell itself to wealthy homosexuals; construction began on hotels and such, but when the wealthy gays targeted by the campaign realized the hordes of gibsmedats weren’t being “re-located”, the “comeback” withered and died. Even mental patients know the physical danger to their persons...

Now they’re demolishing the unfinished shells...


19 posted on 04/10/2014 11:17:41 AM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

“Considering the Lois Lerner horror - it’s time to rethink civil service. Protecting the jobs of biased sycophants was NOT the original idea... in fact that’s what the law was trying to safeguard us from...”

The zombies of our permanent underclass don’t mind scandal (or crime) in government because in the end, they know they’re not paying them. They allow themselves to be led around by the nose because it really is free to them; they are the most fortunate “poor” people in the history of the world.


20 posted on 04/10/2014 11:21:09 AM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson