Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

My Little Pony, 50 Years Later
nytimes.com ^ | April 4, 2014

Posted on 04/08/2014 4:27:41 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012

When the Ford Mustang was introduced 50 years ago this month, it was first to break from the gate in a market class that would come to be known as pony cars.

With a long hood and a short rear deck — proportions carried forward by the Chevrolet Camaro, Plymouth Barracuda and many others — the Mustang looked ready to bolt. And bolt it did, as 22,000 wowed Americans placed orders for the car on April 17, according to Ford, the official first day of sales.

Naming the car for a horse proved to be a stroke of marketing genius. Not just any horse, mind you (a car named Clydesdale might never have been so popular) but one that conjured images of rugged wild horses roaming the American West: The drama that imagery invoked was supported by the car’s fresh style and a galloping steed front and center in the grille.

Underneath, the Mustang was essentially Ford’s Falcon, a solid compact that was available with V8 power and a 4-speed manual transmission. Those underpinnings were enough to get the pony car sales competition off to a fast start.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: mylittlepony
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: bert
"...I bought a VW and a used TR 4...

The first year of the Ford Mustangs was my first time in autocross competition. I lost to a Triumph and Cobra, and beat every time submitted by dozens of drivers that took advantage of a Miami Ford dealer's three "loaned" (free) Ford Mustangs.

I competed back then, with my 36-HP VW 1960 Karmann-Ghia!

:)

61 posted on 04/08/2014 9:47:56 AM PDT by Does so ("Miranda Warnings" and loss of "Common-Law Marriage" = 2 Big Mistakes...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: knarf

Got on the AC Expressway with it, never felt a bump in the road at all. Use to cruise to the shore with it on weekends. The old ‘75 was a sweet cruiser. SS Titanic, but boy was it comfortable.

The 92 is nice too; they called it a “Sport Sedan”, and it’s a lot tighter than the older ones. I would have liked to have gotten the SSEi version, but the $$$ wasn’t there.


62 posted on 04/08/2014 9:53:30 AM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Does so

You left out the part about the Corvettes that always lost


63 posted on 04/08/2014 10:01:37 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... History is a process, not an event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
Today is the day of the muscle car. Even my 2008 mustang blows away the old muscle cars

Yeah, technology has really moved up.

Today, a stock 5.0L (302 c.i.) Ford Mustang GT engine is rated at 412 hp normally aspirated with all the EPA goodies. In testing by the car mags, they consistently come in higher at the crank and about 400 hp. at the rear wheels. And they will easily last 100k+ miles with simple normal maintenance.

In 1965, a Shelby Cobra took a cast iron 427 c.i. (7.0L) big block from Ford's truck group and a lot of Carroll Shelby magic to get around 420 crank hp. that could last a whole F.I.A. race or the 24 Hours at Daytona.

Times have changed.
12 posted on Monday, June 03, 2013 6:54:04 PM by 5thGenTexan


Not sure what thread this was from, but about sums it up. Yea, newer cars may be 'better' and have improved handling, but are they really better? The tech hasn't improved nearly as much as you would expect it to, and now there's all sorts of stupid gadgets and other crap in today's cars. A 2010 Mustang doesn't smell nearly as badass as one from the 60s. Their styling may be similar to the retro look, but for the most part they still don't look quite as good as an older model. Something wrong with your car? Good luck fixing it, there's bunches of sensors and wires that could be causing the issue, and for someone who doesn't know much, basic engine maintenance is much more complicated than it used to be.
Yes, newer vehicles are nice. But if given the option, would you really not prefer to own and drive a more classic vehicle?
64 posted on 04/08/2014 10:22:39 AM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: CrazyIvan

The Barracudas were pretty cool, too.


65 posted on 04/08/2014 10:31:54 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: edpc

LOL


66 posted on 04/08/2014 10:35:17 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: NFHale

I had a 1973 Chrysler Newport in the late 80s. They had started downsizing cars by then and the Newport was a beast. I was at the gas station one day and I guy came up to me and said “that sure is a big car”. LOL Yes, it was. You could put several bodies in the trunk of that thing. I hate the new small cars.


67 posted on 04/08/2014 10:38:31 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Svartalfiar

“Yes, newer vehicles are nice. But if given the option, would you really not prefer to own and drive a more classic vehicle?”

I have the option and I go with ‘newer’.

I was planning for my retirement to restore a classic but now the ‘newer’ is better.

I guess I am soft in my old age. Nice seats, nice stereo, GPS, a quarter mile in the twelves and 20+ mpg on the highway.


68 posted on 04/08/2014 10:42:08 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

“...that sure is a big car...”

Hahah!! head that a LOT back in the 70s!

I picked up a 1979 Chrysler New Yorker from a police auction some years back. Had 56K miles on it (hard, cop miles, and a LOT of idling time), but it was a highway interceptor car - black, with the blue interior, 360 engine, handling package. That thing was a beast. I drove it for three years, put another 50 or 60K or so on it, and it finally threw a rod bearing.

But yeah... they WERE big cars, and they rode like a dream.

Solid is the word ... that’s what they “felt” like when you slammed the door or the trunk, just a good, solid “THUNK!” when it closed.

I’ll take vintage 60s-70s cars any day.

Always like old Buick Wildcats too, and the Oldsmobile Dynamic and Delta 88s.


69 posted on 04/08/2014 10:44:45 AM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Svartalfiar

“Something wrong with your car? Good luck fixing it, there’s bunches of sensors and wires that could be causing the issue, “

I ran my 2000 GT HARD for 125k miles .... Problems? NADA.

My 2008 Bullitt problems? NADA.

Major maintenance for both consists of changing the gas and air filters.


70 posted on 04/08/2014 10:49:51 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: NFHale

Those were the days, my friend...


71 posted on 04/08/2014 10:53:38 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012
the Mustang was essentially Ford’s Falcon, a solid compact that was available with V8 power

in 1964 i was a junior on high school and my dad purchased a 1964 falcon convertible (bumble-bee yellow with black interior) obstensibly for my mom and I to share but she rarely got a chance to drive it. with a little 260 v-8 and 2-speed automatic it was quick enough to get in trouble and it parked extremely well.

72 posted on 04/08/2014 10:55:14 AM PDT by TheRightGuy (I want MY BAILOUT ... a billion or two should do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

Here’s a neat site I found.
http://www.desertclassics.com/index.html

Lots of old muscle and classic beauties sitting in this place... little rust, as its in the desert.

Here in PA, if we find an oldie, it’s usually a rust bucket.


73 posted on 04/08/2014 11:08:15 AM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: TheRightGuy; ilovesarah2012

“..the Mustang was essentially Ford’s Falcon, ..”

I have a book somewhere in my collection, where it talks about the development of the ‘Stang; they showed a shadow silhouette of the Falcon superimposed on the Mustang, and vice-versa. They were pretty damn close.

It was the right car at the right moment for Iacocca. He had a winner.

My favorite body style is the 1967-1968 fastback. Glad that when Ford decided to retro the new ones, they used that as the basis.

69-70 were pretty badass looking too.


74 posted on 04/08/2014 11:15:21 AM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: NFHale
69-70 were pretty badass looking too.

i had a 69 mach 1 for a while, 'til i crashed it. About the only thing remaining was the little chrome "1" ... i drilled a little hole in it an carried it on my keychain for years afterwards.

75 posted on 04/08/2014 11:51:00 AM PDT by TheRightGuy (I want MY BAILOUT ... a billion or two should do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: TheRightGuy

“...an carried it on my keychain for years afterwards...”

Guardian Angel on your shoulder brother...

The Boss 351 and Boss 429s were sweet machines.

I loved the fact that you could have so many V8 engine choices in those cars... 260, 289, 302, 390, 427 then 428, cobrajet, 429 Supercobrajet...

It just added to the mystique.

The Mustang II 74-78 was pitiful.


76 posted on 04/08/2014 12:01:34 PM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: NFHale; TheRightGuy

And the two different 351 configurations too - 351 Windsor and 351 Cleveland...


77 posted on 04/08/2014 12:11:01 PM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: NFHale

My next door neighbor has a canary yellow javelin.


78 posted on 04/08/2014 1:19:05 PM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: NFHale
And the two different 351 configurations too - 351 Windsor and 351 Cleveland...

2 of my boys share a 72 grand Torino (same year as the movie of the same name). They have a 351 Windsor bored/stroked to 427 that was not the original engine. And the original Cleveland which is back in it and is closer to stock. They have throttle body FI replacing the carb on a four bbl manifold tied into the ignition (a kit including FI, distributor and an O2 sensor tied to a computer). It makes the engine run perfect at all speeds and loads. it cranks well for a 351

79 posted on 04/08/2014 1:33:27 PM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: NFHale

Do you happen to know of the site that lists every car ever made? I saw it here quite a while back, and I can no longer find it. I wanted to print a picture of every auto my Dad owned, and give it to him in a little scrap book.

Thanks NFHale, maybe someone remembers the site I am looking for.


80 posted on 04/08/2014 9:09:16 PM PDT by AllAmericanGirl44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson