Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/04/2014 2:49:08 PM PDT by raptor22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: raptor22
Silly Rabbit! How could our soldiers be slaughtered at home in the safety of their bases if they were allowed to defend themselves?
2 posted on 04/04/2014 2:50:46 PM PDT by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

The answer is that the bases are under the command of officers who are concerned with their careers. Should some form of “accident report” come out blaming them for an accidental discharge or a “workplace incident” (like this latest) or a “terror attack” (like Nidal Hassan) they could lose their post.


3 posted on 04/04/2014 2:54:02 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (At no time was the Obama administration aware of what the Obama administration was doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22
Why Are Military Bases Such As Fort Hood Gun-Free?

I don't know - because Obama thinks guns are icky?

4 posted on 04/04/2014 2:54:06 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22; SandRat; Doogle; Foolsgold; ZULU; overbore; JLAGRAYFOX; mazda77; vette6387; onyx; bitt; ..

This is how Israel handles this issue per a Ping earlier.

“The IDF ensures that weapons are either with the soldier (or soldierette) while on duty, while on base or off base. Once they are home they can lock it up but the to and fro travels show them with the weapons all the time.”


6 posted on 04/04/2014 2:57:06 PM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

When did this start happening?


7 posted on 04/04/2014 2:57:18 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

By now it must be reaching the consciousness of people of all persuasions who for various reasons would target Americans in uniform, that attacking the military base is not as safe as attacking a school, but it isn’t so terribly different, and the payoff for terrorists, from Muslim to just anti-American, or anti-nuke, or anti-national policy whatevers, is incredible, mass numbers of unarmed uniformed representatives of the U.S. and on federal property, with maximum publicity.

I suggest that we should be in a rush to fix this vulnerability.

When I was in, the little arms rooms scattered around the bases were seen as a magnet for those who wanted to steal arms.


11 posted on 04/04/2014 3:00:44 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

Now the Left will wail about gun control. Well, it was gun control that made the base a gun free zone.


12 posted on 04/04/2014 3:01:10 PM PDT by bk1000 (A clear conscience is a sure sign of a poor memory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22
Why Are Military Bases Such As Fort Hood Gun-Free?

To break the spirit of the US Military.

13 posted on 04/04/2014 3:01:26 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it, and the Constitution and law mean what WE say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

Biily boy Clinton.


14 posted on 04/04/2014 3:07:28 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22
Because of the leadership's deep rooted mistrust of ordinary men and women.

16 posted on 04/04/2014 3:11:46 PM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

Perhaps if Republicans win the House and Senate they can pass a Federal CCW law.


17 posted on 04/04/2014 3:13:17 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

This Is Why Most Military Personnel Aren’t Armed on Military Bases — and It’s Not Clinton’s Fault
It appears this “gun-free zone” type policy can actually be traced back to Department of Defense (DoD) Directive 5210.56, signed into effect in February 1992 by Donald J. Atwood, deputy secretary of defense under President George H.W. Bush.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/09/17/this-is-why-most-military-personnel-are-disarmed-on-military-bases-and-its-not-clintons-fault/
Don’t shelter in place in da bushes


22 posted on 04/04/2014 3:16:24 PM PDT by TurboZamboni (Marx smelled bad and lived with his parents .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

President H.W. Bush Enacted Military Base Gun Regulations In 1992, A Year Before Clinton Took Office. As The New Republic explained, a 1992 Department of Defense directive established the rules limiting firearms on military bases to “qualified personnel,” issued under former President George H.W. Bush and Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney:


24 posted on 04/04/2014 3:22:50 PM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

I think police stations, jails, and prisons should be gun-free zones. /s


25 posted on 04/04/2014 3:23:59 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

Oh, I forgot courthouses, especially.


26 posted on 04/04/2014 3:24:52 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum; markomalley; Clairity; Carlucci; grey_whiskers; meyer; WL-law; Para-Ord.45; ...

GUN CONTROL PING


27 posted on 04/04/2014 3:25:23 PM PDT by raptor22 (Follow me on Twitter @gerfingerpoken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22
I'd feel safer at the ice cream store.

(in Israel)

28 posted on 04/04/2014 3:25:34 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

I hate to interject a little historical reality here, but throughout history, military bases frequently haven’t let enlisted or drafted soldiers carry weapons. This is to prevent attacks on officers, as well as attacks by hostile forces camouflaging themselves as friendlies.

As much as I hate Obama and his policies, I don’t think this began with with him.


31 posted on 04/04/2014 3:30:27 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Grampa Dave; granite; GreenFreeper; grjr21; I got the rope; IchBinEinBerliner; jaredt112; JayB; ...

GUN CONTROL PING


36 posted on 04/04/2014 3:41:05 PM PDT by raptor22 (Follow me on Twitter @gerfingerpoken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

” Why Are Military Bases Such As Fort Hood Gun-Free?”

Same reason our nuclear missile silos are empty.


38 posted on 04/04/2014 3:49:47 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson