Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Climate change could cost more than $100 billion a year
CNN ^ | March 31, 2014 | By By Ivana Kottasova

Posted on 03/31/2014 6:21:32 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

Tackling the effects of climate change could cost governments around the world more than $100 billion a year, a United Nations panel of experts said Monday.

A report by the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, says that a temperature rise of 2 degrees Celsius will wipe out up to 2% of the world's income by 2050.

"If we get up to 4 degrees temperature rise, which most scientists now expect would happen if we carry on emitting greenhouse gasses as we do, then the cost could be much more severe," Chris Hope, a climate change researcher at Cambridge University said.

The combined cost of crop losses, rising sea levels, higher temperatures and fresh water shortages could mount of to between $70 and $100 billion a year, the report said.

(Excerpt) Read more at edition.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: climatechange; climategate; globalwarming; hoax; ipcc; socialism; tax; un; weather
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: oh8eleven

True that. More IPCC, Maurice Strong, one-world, Marxism BS.


21 posted on 03/31/2014 7:23:08 AM PDT by TurboZamboni (Marx smelled bad and lived with his parents .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Wouldn’t it be cool if “we” were smart enough to pick an issue like this, where you can continually redefine the terms and shift ground without ever getting caught at it, so no matter what facts emerge, you’re always right, and always have the support of the big mouthpieces? It’s like they have their cake and not only eat it too, but get fresh candles to blow out and more wishes every day! No matter what the facts are, they can find a way to prove their argument. Too hot? Climate Change. Too windy? Climate Change. Nothing unusual? Well, that’s Climate Change too, just the calm before the storm.


22 posted on 03/31/2014 7:23:58 AM PDT by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lacrew

4 degrees in the next 36 years? When there has been no warming for the last 17 years? Truly fantasy land.


23 posted on 03/31/2014 7:24:07 AM PDT by p. henry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

They really want to change your Local Weather into Climate Change and when it fails what will they call their BULL next


24 posted on 03/31/2014 7:25:07 AM PDT by molson209 (Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck; Oldeconomybuyer
I'm voting for 2o C. temp increase, and 1500 - 1800 ppm CO2, so we can open up agriculture at higher latitudes and optimize food production on the Eurasian landmass. Wealth abounding.

Amirite?

25 posted on 03/31/2014 7:28:45 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (When I grow up, I'm gonna settle down, chew honeycomb & drive a tractor, grow things in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

You realize, of course, that if the governments had passed climate change laws years ago, this extremely cold winter would be used as “proof” that climate change laws work!


26 posted on 03/31/2014 7:29:20 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Sometimes you need 7+ more ammo. LOTS MORE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Tackling the effects of climate change could cost governments around the world more than $100 billion a year

MORE TRUTHFUL:

Tackling the climate change scam could cost taxpayers around the world more than $100 billion a year

27 posted on 03/31/2014 7:32:46 AM PDT by Iron Munro (The future ain't what it use to be -- Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck; All
We should reap trillions.

What about higher forest productivity because they're growing faster too?

What about the extra revenue from higher agricultural yields? PLUS, a longer growing season means less food has to be imported, lowering the cost of living.

Warmer temps also mean lower fuel bills (and, paradoxically, less CO2 produced).

Global warming is GOOD for society!!


28 posted on 03/31/2014 7:41:57 AM PDT by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

And every unhinged maniac has his hand out for it.


29 posted on 03/31/2014 7:44:46 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Climate change is going to cost $100 billion a year? Are people really going to spend that much on tulips and daffodils now that spring is here?


30 posted on 03/31/2014 7:46:11 AM PDT by NRA1995 (I'd rather be a living "gun culture" member than a dead anti-gun candy-ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Tackling the effects of climate change could cost governments around the world more than $100 billion a year, a United Nations panel of experts said Monday.

Money down the Climate Change Drain. Doing nothing would cost nothing and the consequences would be nothing except that the world would have $100 billion a year that it could leave in the hands of the real owners of that wealth rather than in the hands of a bunch of racketeer politicians.

31 posted on 03/31/2014 8:22:12 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
 photo TRUTH_zpsb9327e8b.jpg
32 posted on 03/31/2014 8:28:07 AM PDT by baddog 219
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The 100 billion barely covers the weather. Global warming fanatics are going to cost us trillions before a cold cycle puts an end to their scams.


33 posted on 03/31/2014 8:47:18 AM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Tuned on CNN for a few minutes this morning. That was enough for me - Talking again (still and forever) about MH370 while the scroll at the bottom highlighted the doom and gloom over the latest IPCC report. Flight 370 is the only thing that has saved their abysmal ratings this past month.


34 posted on 03/31/2014 9:57:07 AM PDT by CedarDave (CNN: The "Crisis News Channel" - all Flight 370 hysteria and global warming blather, all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

And fighting climate change - that is, opposing the four seasons to the eternal profit of Boxer, Kerry, Markey, Gore et al - will cost untold trillions.

But, hey, it’s a good cause. Can’t have too many carbon billionaires, can we?
And who doesn’t want to eliminate for all time thunder, lightning, rain, tornadoes, hurricanes, storms, rain, fog and drizzle, right?

Perfect climate for all, abundant crops without sources of water, life’s a beach.


35 posted on 03/31/2014 11:20:31 AM PDT by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

That would be great, but I am afraid the planet will not cooperate and we’ve likely gotten about as warm as it’s gonna get for a long time.


36 posted on 03/31/2014 12:21:37 PM PDT by Go_Raiders (Freedom doesn't give you the right to take from others, no matter how innocent your program sounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson