Posted on 03/30/2014 12:36:37 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
I don’t think Barack Obama was born in Kenya.
Yes, his father was born in Kenya, and his brother was born in Kenya. But that doesn’t mean he himself was born in Kenya.
And yes, for 16 years he allowed his literary agent to circulate a one-paragraph bio stating that he was born in Kenya, which was revised numerous times over the years while continuing to state that he was born in Kenya. But I’m inclined to think he did that because it seemed cool and a way to sell books and not because it was true.
And yes, he refuses to release his college transcripts, as other presidents and candidates have done. But I’m guessing that’s because they show poor grades and not because they state he was a foreign student.
And yes, for many years he attended a church where the pastor sometimes exclaimed, “God damn America!” but I think he was just trying to fit in.
No, I don’t think he’s Kenyan.
But I wonder whether he’s Manchurian.
“The Manchurian Candidate” was a 2004 movie about a U.S. politician who was secretly a “sleeper agent” working to overthrow American democracy. (Manchuria is the region of Russia and China where the agent had been brainwashed into working for the other side.)
Here’s why I wonder:
When Obama came into office, he announced that he was “resetting” America’s relationship with Russia. Sure enough, he then canceled the planned defensive missiles in Poland aimed at deterring a Russian invasion. That infuriated our Polish allies and pleased the Russians. He got nothing from the Russians in return that we know of.
Vladimir Putin was then the Russian prime minister, and Dmitri Medvedev was the Russian president. Putin was the boss, and Medvedev was his handpicked puppet.
Later, Obama spoke at a seminar with Medvedev, who speaks English. Putin was not there.
During a break, Obama approached Medvedev on the stage. Thinking his microphone was off, he said privately, just one on one, “This is my last election. After my election, I’ll have more flexibility.” The context was a discussion on defense. Good puppet that he was, Medvedev promised, “I will transmit this information to Vladimir.”
But the microphone was not off. The exchange was captured and recorded. And the pair also were captured by a distant video camera showing Obama warmly shaking the hand of Medvedev and patting Medvedev’s knee as they completed the exchange.
Ask yourself this: Why did Obama choose an awkward in-person exchange on a stage at a seminar for delivery of this important message? Why didn’t he simply pick up the phone in the Oval Office and call Putin directly? Could it be because he didn’t want any Americans to hear it — even White House aides and interpreters?
Fast forward another two years. Russia has invaded a sovereign nation, Ukraine, and has purported to annex part of it. Obama’s response so far has been to impose “sanctions” that are so trivial that the Russians have literally laughed at them.
Putin refuses to state whether he will extend his invasion farther into Ukraine or re-invade the East European countries that were liberated by the fall of the Soviet empire in 1991 — an event that Putin has repeatedly declared was “the major geopolitical disaster of the century.”
In contrast to Putin’s poker face, Obama — without being told Putin’s next move insofar as we know — has ruled out military options. In short, Putin has refused to rule out annexing additional sovereign nations, and Obama has refused to guarantee that he’ll stop him.
In dealing with foreign dictators gassing their people as they did in Syria, threatening to “wipe Israel off the map” with a nuclear attack as Iran repeatedly has done, invading sovereign nations as Russia has now done or threatening to reduce America to “radioactive dust” as one of Putin’s apparatchiks recently did, Obama promises “resets” and “flexibility.”
On those promises, by golly, he’s delivered. He boasts that his strategy constitutes “leading from behind.” (I wonder if he imagines that Putin is “following from the front.”)
In dealing with Americans, on the other hand, he shows less flexibility, gives few “resets” and most decidedly leads from the front. The White House uses the National Security Agency to spy on Americans, uses the IRS to target Americans with whom it disagrees politically, refuses to rescue American diplomats begging for help as they’re slaughtered in Benghazi, calls the American political party that freed the slaves “hostage takers” and, most recently, uses the CIA to conduct surveillance on American senators (according to the longtime Democratic senator who heads the Senate Foreign Relations Committee).
One more thing: That seminar — the one where Obama made his fateful promise to the Russians that in his defense of freedom and liberty he would be flexible — was in South Korea, just a few hundred miles from Manchuria.
Manchurian??? Here’s another angle: http://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2012/12/12/u-s-physicist-tom-fife-obama-was-groomed-to-be-president-by-soviet-communists/
She wasn’t old enough because one parent wasn’t a US citizen.
And those of us were called racist for pointing this out in ‘08 and beyond!
No, he isn’t. He’s a Marxist.
Wow, I said that in October of ‘08, 6 years later people are just beginning to wonder? The “normalcy bias” is big.
God save the Queen's English.
It's "if" he's Manchurian. "Whether" is a comparative...a this or that.
exactky
true
i caught that comment too and wondered
There is a story/mystery involved with Obama. Connecting time and event dots and people leads me to believe Obama was conceived in Indonesia by an affair of Stanley Ann with a guru named Subuh. She was pushed out and found her way to Kenya with a Kenyan who was a student at the college in Hawaii. After a quickie marriage and the birth of a child Stanley Ann went back to the States via Seattle and later on had her Kenyon marriage annulled which is in Hawaii records and a copy on internet line. There are many more dots and places associated with these times of Obama’s childhood.
Gr8 post . I appreciate your analysis.
Great stuff thanks for the post/link.
But I wonder whether he's Manchurian.
Perhaps this is not the proper way to attempt this little homily, but I think I may know the inner mind of the President. I have read "Dreams from my Father." Whether or not the President really wrote it, might be a moot point. He must have agreed to what was in that book.
I remember the hard scrabble years after WW2 in England as a working class lad. A secretary where I worked used to get the Saturday Evening Post sent from the States. There it was, the tranquil world of Norman Rockwell. It was a far off paradise to us.
Later, fools of young people rebelled against that world. Instead of taking off and going to some effete country and seeing just how others lived, they wanted to smash it. The mindless rotters who should have known better in the academic world encouraged this hatred. Anyone doubts this, read "A Singular Woman" by Janny Scott. The story of Stanley Ann Dunham.
She had everything going for her considering other young women of her era. A bit of a ramble and I should cut to the chase. The President has been suborned and corrupted in his youth by rotters who hate America. Rotters, who even yet, live far higher on the hog than Joe Six Pack. The joker who tramples the American flag and then calls the police if someone bugs him etc.
This will pass and America will survive any Manchurian. Or else the free world will take a tumble.
There is a possibility that the people who attempted to corrupt and suborn a young Barack Obama, have left a mark.
Why is it that so many presumably intelligent people refuse to understand that not one of president obama’s decisions have been beneficial to the USA or it’s citizens or allies, but all have benefited our and our allies’ adversaries? If obama was just an innocent bumbler, shouldn’t at least one of his actions worked out to this nation’s best interest?
Because not many can articulate it as well as you just did, and make people believe it at the same time.
If it were true that Obama were a Manchurian candidate don’t you think there would be many powerful people in a position to know it, and would benefit from exposing it?
Or, could it be that so almost everyone in and around DC are too stupid to see it.
It just doesn’t add up, anyway I look at it
************************************************************
And those of us were called racist for pointing this out in ‘08 and beyond!
*******************************************************
I suspect even Glenn Beaton viewed us that way in '08... Maybe Chris Matthews will wake up...
The way I see it has been posted by danamco @ reply 41. I posted this Tom Fife thing the other nite, and I believe that he has it right. Here is danamco’s posted URL-
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.