Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The War on Hobby Lobby: Obama wants to win this to prove a point.
National Review ^ | 03/25/2014 | Rich Lowry

Posted on 03/25/2014 10:23:36 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Not too long ago, the Greens of Oklahoma City were law-abiding people running an arts-and-crafts chain called Hobby Lobby.

They weren’t disturbing the peace, or denying anyone his or her rights. They were minding their own business — quite successfully and in keeping with their Christian faith. The roughly 600 Hobby Lobby stores stock Christian products, close on Sundays, and play Christian music.

Then one day Uncle Sam showed up to make an offer that the Greens couldn’t refuse — literally. As part of Obamacare, federal law demands that the chain cover contraceptives that the Greens consider abortifacients. The family decided it couldn’t comply with the law in good conscience, and its case is now before the Supreme Court.

Hobby Lobby went from an inoffensive business to a scofflaw and an alleged combatant in the “war on women” in no time at all — and without changing any significant employment or business practice. Thus is the transformation wrought by the coercive sweep of Obamacare, which risks doing as much damage to conscience rights as it has done to the insurance market.

Hobby Lobby is trying to fend off the federal government via the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, a law that Democrats used to support before they realized how inconvenient it would prove to the Obama-era project of running roughshod over moral traditionalists. The act says that government can’t substantially burden someone’s exercise of religion unless there’s a compelling governmental interest at stake and it’s pursued by the least restrictive means.

The contraception mandate fails on all counts, as Ed Whelan of the Ethics and Public Policy Center has demonstrated in his incisive writings on the case. The Obama administration has admitted that the mandate is a burden on religious exercise through its own regulatory actions. It exempted a small category of “religious employers” (e.g., churches) for just this reason. The Department of Health and Human Services explained that “it is appropriate” to take into account the “effect on the religious beliefs of certain religious employers if coverage of contraceptive services were required.”

It is hard to see how the government has a “compelling interest” in the mandate, when the vast majority of employers already cover contraceptives and the administration has exempted many employers with no religious objections by grandfathering their pre-mandate insurance plans.

There are certainly less restrictive means of widening access to contraception. Whelan points out that government could find another, more direct way to distribute or subsidize contraceptives, without forcing any employer to pay for contraceptives that it considers immoral.

The administration argues that the owners of a for-profit corporation have no free-exercise rights, although this runs counter to common sense and the law. Everyone recognizes that nonprofit corporations have such rights, so what makes for-profit corporations different? Besides, Congress went out of its way to define the ambit of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act to include “any exercise of religion,” in order to create “a broad protection of religious exercise.”

Hobby Lobby is now bizarrely portrayed as wanting to barge into examination rooms. “Selectively denying insurance coverage for contraceptive methods an employer considers sinful,” the liberal legal lion Walter Dellinger wrote in the Washington Post, “makes the employer a party to a woman’s medical consultations.” And here the Greens thought they were just selling glue, scrapbook paper, beads, and the like.

The truth is that the Obama administration wants to bring Hobby Lobby to heel as a matter of principle. In its pinched view of religion, faith should be limited as much as possible to the pews. In its attenuated regard for civil society, it believes government should overawe any person, business, or institution whose beliefs run counter to officially sanctioned attitudes.

Make no mistake, the culture war is alive and well, and the aggressor isn’t Hobby Lobby. The Greens will be happy to go back to minding their own business — if the federal government sees fit to permit them.

— Rich Lowry is the editor of National Review.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; aca; bho44; bhoabortion; bhoscotus; deathpanels; healthcare; hobbylobby; lawsuit; obamacare; scotus; zerocare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: SeekAndFind
First they came for the ......
21 posted on 03/25/2014 10:57:20 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: februus

I’m thinking Roberts would have to use even more twisted logic (if that is even possible) to find against HL than he used to find in favor of Obamacare.

A HL loss would send a huge message, and not a good one.


22 posted on 03/25/2014 11:01:58 AM PDT by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: februus

A HL loss would send a huge message, and not a good one.

In fact, it could be a sort of Ft Sumter thing.


23 posted on 03/25/2014 11:02:59 AM PDT by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

The point Obama wants to make is that opposition to
his policies will NOT be tolerated. Well, except maybe
for Islamic religious freedom which is backed by
terror. I sometimes wonder if the administration
isn’t putting this pressure on the Christians to
get THEM to institute Religious Freedom actions
which will then be used to allow Islam freedom to
institute Shari’a law.

Interesting times, it sure isn’t boreing.


24 posted on 03/25/2014 11:07:12 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines

The ballot box is our only recourse.


Actually it’s not. It’s just the only one we feel comfortable talking about.


25 posted on 03/25/2014 11:09:44 AM PDT by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
It's all about government power and control.

It's like Holder trying to deport the German family that wanted to stay here so they could homeschool their children. Just the lust for power.

Of course it helps that Obama and many of his followers have contempt for freedom of conscience and for traditional moral values...but that is just the icing on the cake for the Obama gang.

26 posted on 03/25/2014 11:11:19 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Should the government pick and choose who gets to live out their faith?

The rat bastards think so.

27 posted on 03/25/2014 11:13:57 AM PDT by Mark17 (Chicago Blackhawks: Stanley Cup champions 2010, 2013. Vietnam Vet 70-71 Msgt US Air Force, retired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Understand that the left doesn’t oppose “religion”.
They oppose Christ.


28 posted on 03/25/2014 11:15:10 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

Yes..................I’m ready...............

The ballot box is what got us in the mess to begin with.

I TOTALLY AGREE!!!!!

If I had my way, only property owners,business owners, and shareholders and taxpayers would be permitted to vote. And....verifiable US citizens.


29 posted on 03/25/2014 11:16:26 AM PDT by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines

If I had my way, only property owners,business owners, and shareholders and taxpayers would be permitted to vote. And....verifiable US citizens.


Yep. I’ve said pretty much the same thing since before there was such a thing as PC.


30 posted on 03/25/2014 11:30:29 AM PDT by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

contraceptives should be provided to the retailer free of charge. The manufacturer should bill the federal government and the consumer could get them free.


31 posted on 03/25/2014 11:38:20 AM PDT by terycarl (common sense prevails over all else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson