Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exclusive: Man found guilty of electronic cigarette law that does not exist
The Examiner ^ | 03-22-2014 | Jeff Sherwood

Posted on 03/24/2014 7:22:29 AM PDT by PaulCruz2016

Since the court failed to prove that Mr. Dewing was using a cell phone, they went after him for using the electronic cigarette. “The judge asked me if I know what the ‘e’ in e-cigarette means,” said Jason. “I told him it means electronic.” At this point the judge told Mr. Dewing that he was using a portable electronic device which is a violation of New York traffic law 1225-d. Jason, refusing to let the court off that easy, told him that an electronic cigarette was not classified as a portable electronic device under the law. He says, “They were baffled. In fact, they didn't even know the law. The District Attorney had to look it up after I recited it to them. It is ridiculous that I have never been to law school and do not make it a habit of studying the law, yet I had to tell them what their own law was!” Unfortunately for Jason, the law was not known by the court until after they had already found him guilty of violating New York traffic law 1225-d.

There is a bright side to this story for Jason Dewing. “The judge told me that if I would have made them aware of the law before he made his ruling he would have dismissed the ticket, but since he already made his ruling, the only way to overturn it was to go to appeals court.” Jason feels that he has a very good chance of the case being appealed since the law that he was found guilty of breaking does not even exist. “The way the law is written, an e-cigarette cannot make a call nor can it send text or data; therefore, it cannot be a portable electronic device,” said Jason.

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; US: New York
KEYWORDS: ecigarette; ecigarrest; ecigs; nannystate; newyork; smoking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 03/24/2014 7:22:29 AM PDT by PaulCruz2016
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PaulCruz2016

Prosecutors are not interested in seeing Justice served.


2 posted on 03/24/2014 7:25:17 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PaulCruz2016

At least 50% of all idiots must be in some form of government in NY.


3 posted on 03/24/2014 7:25:29 AM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PaulCruz2016

The judge is also an idiot. He can reverse himself. He’s clearly a lazy cog in the machine.


4 posted on 03/24/2014 7:29:40 AM PDT by TheThirdRuffian (RINOS like Romney, McCain, Christie are sure losers. No more!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Neither are judges, apparently.


5 posted on 03/24/2014 7:30:17 AM PDT by coloradan (The US has become a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PaulCruz2016

By the way, Mr. Judge, “Ignorance of the law is no excuse.” This judge should be impeached and removed from the bench.


6 posted on 03/24/2014 7:31:11 AM PDT by coloradan (The US has become a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PaulCruz2016

It just goes to show you... Too Damn many laws out there.

It’s time to start Legal reductions. No new laws! Time limit existing laws and if they are really necessary renew them for a ten year period!


7 posted on 03/24/2014 7:31:28 AM PDT by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PaulCruz2016

Seems like the judge could do more then that to fix it. Time for a judge to be fired.


8 posted on 03/24/2014 7:33:39 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PaulCruz2016

Peasant law - know it, love it.


9 posted on 03/24/2014 7:34:57 AM PDT by kiryandil (turning Americans into felons, one obnoxious drunk at a time (Zero Tolerance!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PaulCruz2016

There is no interest in seeing justice served, just in getting a conviction. The judge is supposed to be an impartial arbitrator, now they have become revenue generators for the police state.


10 posted on 03/24/2014 7:37:20 AM PDT by Brooklyn Attitude (Things are only going to get worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PaulCruz2016

Good thing he wasn’t using an electric device like . . . an electric car!

Will car radios be banned?


11 posted on 03/24/2014 7:37:39 AM PDT by rey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PaulCruz2016
It is ridiculous that I have never been to law school and do not make it a habit of studying the law, yet I had to tell them what their own law was!”

Sounds familiar :

I’m confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected congress.

If our “Constitutional Scholar” President does not know the Constitution and Marbury vs. Madison, how can we expect more from those in New York?

12 posted on 03/24/2014 7:38:21 AM PDT by Michael.SF. (I never thought anyone could make Jimmy Carter look good in comparison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PaulCruz2016
It is ridiculous that I have never been to law school and do not make it a habit of studying the law, yet I had to tell them what their own law was!”

Sounds familiar :

"I’m confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected congress." - Barrack 0bama

If our “Constitutional Scholar” President does not know the Constitution and Marbury vs. Madison, how can we expect more from those in New York?

13 posted on 03/24/2014 7:39:33 AM PDT by Michael.SF. (I never thought anyone could make Jimmy Carter look good in comparison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheThirdRuffian

Actually, I don’t think the judge is being stupid - I think he’s being vindictive. They didn’t have enough evidence to convict him for using the cellphone, so the judge (who must believe that he was using the phone illegally) decided he would punish him anyway by using this ridiculous interpretation of the portable electronic device law, and them either make him pay the fine or go through the trouble of filing an appeal.


14 posted on 03/24/2014 7:39:43 AM PDT by zencycler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The Working Man

“Time limit existing laws and if they are really necessary renew them for a ten year period!”

Ten years is too long. two to five years max.


15 posted on 03/24/2014 7:42:50 AM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a Tea Party descendant...steeped in the Constitutional Republic given to us by the Founders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

Why an appeal? No law, no crime, no judgement deserved!
Both the Judge and the DA need a new profession!


16 posted on 03/24/2014 7:42:55 AM PDT by DocJhn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DocJhn
Can you say “malicious prosecution”

I see a law suit coming.

17 posted on 03/24/2014 8:03:53 AM PDT by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PaulCruz2016

He had transgressed the unwritten law.


18 posted on 03/24/2014 8:04:34 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PaulCruz2016

There are so many judges that need to be impeached.


19 posted on 03/24/2014 8:07:57 AM PDT by logic101.net (How many more children must die on the altar of gun control?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
Prosecutors are not interested in seeing Justice served.

A citizen who goes to court expecting to find Justice will be severely disappointed.

For there, they will only find the Law. And those who are experts at the Game.

20 posted on 03/24/2014 8:25:25 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Truth sounds like hate...to those who hate truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson