Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How much weight should our opposition to abortion carry in our voting decisions?
ligonier.org ^ | 3/22/14 | RC Sproul, Jr

Posted on 03/22/2014 2:46:47 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper

How much weight should our opposition to abortion carry in our voting decisions?

God calls us to think His thoughts after Him. That means all of His thoughts. That is, we ought to have a sound and biblical view on everything the Bible touches on. Where it touches on political issues, we are called, again to have sound biblical views. We need to think biblically about what is just war and what is not. We need to think faithfully about taxation, and the size and scope of government. We need to think through what obligation, if any the state has to protect property, to protect our lives.

That said, there are precious few things that frustrate me more about the evangelical right than its utter foolishness with respect to proportion politically. We bundle together this issue and that, everything from tax rates to school vouchers to flag burning to abortion, and call it “family values.” There is a right and a wrong answer on all these issues. But abortion is not like any of the others. It stands out all on its own. In a hundred years, the Christian church will not hang its head in shame that it did so little to pass a Constitutional Amendment against the burning of the flag. In a hundred years, no elderly Christian will be looked at with suspicion by the younger generation because they didn’t do more to lower the tax rate. In a hundred years, if God should be so gracious, we will be looked upon as that godless generation of the church that watched tens of millions of babies go to their deaths. Indeed, we’ll be remembered as those “Christians” who elected men to office who believed that the state ought to protect the rights of some mothers to murder their babies.

It is unfair to draw too tight a comparison between abortion in America and the Holocaust in Nazi Germany. There are significant differences. First, the Holocaust was carried out, by and large, in secret. The rank and file Germans had no idea what was going on. We, on the other hand, every last one of us, woke up today knowing that four thousand babies would die today. We, on the other hand, have four thousand mothers, every day, who knowingly do this. We, on the other hand, have four thousand fathers, boyfriends and husbands who every day encourage this. The Holocaust lasted roughly ten years, and the Nazi’s killed roughly six million people. We, on the other hand, have been at this for 35 years, and have killed more than fifty million babies. It is an unfair comparison, unfair to the Nazis. We are far worse monsters.

How much weight should our opposition carry? I have purposed in my heart that I would never vote for a man for any office that is not committed to using every power at his disposal to protect and defend every unborn child. Never. Ever. If every Christian would simply make that simple pledge, then we would win this battle. As it stands, at best we vote for candidates who might nominate or support judicial candidates who might vote for this small impediment or that to abortion on demand. At worst, we vote for the guy with the R by his name. We need to get rid of our strategies, and get on our knees in repentance. We need to stop negotiating with candidates over the bodies of dead babies.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2014; abortion; infanticide; prolife; vote
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-191 next last
To: bicyclerepair
Gov’t should not be involved with abortion or marriage.

You are not a Libertarian, you are just a pro-abortion mechanic.

81 posted on 03/22/2014 10:56:53 PM PDT by itsahoot (Voting for RINOs is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk
I agree that this is a state issue

Euthanasia both voluntary and involuntary, is now a state issue, are you proud of your stance?

Without the right to life there are no rights.

82 posted on 03/22/2014 11:05:05 PM PDT by itsahoot (Voting for RINOs is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

At present, there is no Constitutional amendment stating that human life is protected in the womb. I am not now, nor have I been since I started voting in 1971, a pro-abort.

There are no amendments concerning marriage, either. That doesn’t mean there cannot be in the future.


83 posted on 03/22/2014 11:06:55 PM PDT by SatinDoll (A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN IS BORN IN THE USA OF USA CITIZEN PARENTS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

At present, there is no Constitutional amendment stating that human life is protected in the womb. I am not now, nor have I been since I started voting in 1971, a pro-abort.

There are no amendments concerning marriage, either. That doesn’t mean there cannot be in the future.


84 posted on 03/22/2014 11:14:33 PM PDT by SatinDoll (A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN IS BORN IN THE USA OF USA CITIZEN PARENTS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

But this is not what this thread is about. There are plenty of Rand Paul threads, this is about “How much weight should our opposition to abortion carry in our voting decisions”.


85 posted on 03/23/2014 3:18:36 AM PDT by BeadCounter (morning glory evening grace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Another "black and white" question in a shades-of-gray reality.

Abortion is murder. Any advocate of abortion shouldn't be voted for.

The problem is that we have someone on the Left who is a rabid supporter of abortion and who wishes it could be available at every corner store. Then we have a "Republican" who "thinks there might be some cases where it might be allowable".

If those are your choices, do you vote for the one with the unformed/immature opinion or do you allow the rabid pro-murder on demand guy win by default?

86 posted on 03/23/2014 4:31:03 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Linda Frances

I so appreciate your post, and more than that I appreciate your service as a volunteer.

My heart breaks when I think about how this nation has endorsed the murder of MILLIONS of babies. Makes me angry and sick to my stomach all at the same time.

We are going down the same path with the perversion of marriage, and all I can think is that God’s judgment is so very near.

I am glad you have been able to help heal some hearts.

I give to Live Action, in hope that some of the tide can be turned.


87 posted on 03/23/2014 5:29:12 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot
Euthanasia both voluntary and involuntary, is now a state issue, are you proud of your stance?

Really? Was that the gist of what I was talking about? Or was I discussing how conservatives should simply lie like the democRATS do when asked about abortion or any other topic that the democRAT media chooses to hang on them as a millstone.

I am not, have not, advocated for or against euthanasia, and that was not even part of the conversation.

And yes, for the record, that is a state issue and has no business in the federal courts.

88 posted on 03/23/2014 5:45:08 AM PDT by Ouderkirk (To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

It's just a "social issue". The young libertarians don't want to be "festooned" by it.

89 posted on 03/23/2014 6:02:21 AM PDT by Theophilus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

If a candidate is pro elective murder, he/she has failed the litmus test.

Yet I repeat my tagline.


90 posted on 03/23/2014 6:33:02 AM PDT by Blue Collar Christian (Vote Democrat. Once you're OK with killing babies the rest is easy. <BCC><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bicyclerepair

“I’m a conservative NOT a republican.

Gov’t should not be involved with abortion or marriage. These two should be only between a woman/dr and people/ministers respectively. It’s not my d@mn business.

Or is that libertarian? Ok, I’m libertarian.”

Yes, you are libertarian. No, you are NOT conservative.

You want to be fiscally conservative and morally liberal. You have made up your mind to be duplicitous. But should we allow that you are being halfway honest?

I believe you have accepted that abortion is not murder, or would you give consent to murder of, say a 3 year old retarded girl, as it is between a woman/dr and people/ministers respectively? beings how it’s none of your **** business.


91 posted on 03/23/2014 6:45:56 AM PDT by Blue Collar Christian (Vote Democrat. Once you're OK with killing babies the rest is easy. <BCC><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: trebb
The problem is that we have someone on the Left who is a rabid supporter of abortion and who wishes it could be available at every corner store. Then we have a "Republican" who "thinks there might be some cases where it might be allowable". If those are your choices, do you vote for the one with the unformed/immature opinion or do you allow the rabid pro-murder on demand guy win by default?

The real issue is that there is a large faction on the Left which is just as hard-line about abortion as many on the Right are about the Second Amendment. Having a firmly anti-abortion candidate brings them out in activist mode just as strongly as having an anti-2A brings us out.

92 posted on 03/23/2014 7:45:27 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: BeadCounter

Drop this nuttiness, your very first post on this thread, was to me, about Rand Paul, your second post on this thread was on libertarians, your third post brought up Rand Paul again, I didn’t respond to you until post 50, and you are the one who keeps posting to me about Rand Paul.

I was late to your Rand Paul party.

You are posting like crazy on Rand Paul, someone was going to disagree with you about him if you kept going on posting on him as you have.

Trolling for libertarians and Paul can’t be done without someone correcting you.


93 posted on 03/23/2014 9:48:26 AM PDT by ansel12 ((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
The real issue is that there is a large faction on the Left which is just as hard-line about abortion as many on the Right are about the Second Amendment. Having a firmly anti-abortion candidate brings them out in activist mode just as strongly as having an anti-2A brings us out.

So?

94 posted on 03/23/2014 9:49:52 AM PDT by ansel12 ((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Theophilus

Well illustrated.


95 posted on 03/23/2014 9:52:04 AM PDT by ansel12 ((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Everything and ALL


96 posted on 03/23/2014 9:53:41 AM PDT by Friendofgeorge (Sarah Palin 2016 OR BUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

I would even add to that, if a Democrat running claims to be pro life, what`s he doing in that party? So I simplify, NO DEMS


97 posted on 03/23/2014 9:56:40 AM PDT by Friendofgeorge (Sarah Palin 2016 OR BUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: trebb
The problem is that we have someone on the Left who is a rabid supporter of abortion and who wishes it could be available at every corner store. Then we have a "Republican" who "thinks there might be some cases where it might be allowable".

If you want the party to drop social issues, then you start voting for GOP candidates who are refusing to accept the party platform and let them take over the party.

98 posted on 03/23/2014 9:57:54 AM PDT by ansel12 ((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

100% weight. Period. Killing children is murder. The term ‘abortion’ was introduced by liberals to soften their killing of babies.


99 posted on 03/23/2014 10:13:43 AM PDT by CodeToad (Keeping whites from talking about blacks is verbal segregation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Friendofgeorge

I can honestly say I’ve never voted for a Democrat, wouldn’t even consider one no matter what they said. Their party plank is corrupt to the core, anyone associated with that party (and franlky, most GOP’s also) are assumed to be corrupt.


100 posted on 03/23/2014 10:33:36 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-191 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson