Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Connecticut activists ready to ‘ramp up the pressure'
Examiner.com ^ | March 12, 2014 | Examiner

Posted on 03/17/2014 9:42:52 AM PDT by Kenny

Connecticut gun rights activists are using yesterday’s report of a home invasion by an on-line southwest Florida news service to bolster their opposition to the Constitution State’s new gun control law, and today Reason.com is reporting that one police agency is conducting an internal investigation of an officer who said he would like to “bang down your door and come after your gun.”

This conflict is taking on all the earmarks of an approaching reckoning. The National Rifle Association last week discussed at length the confusion created around the new gun control law. It doesn't help when some folks apparently play games on the Internet.

In an e-mail exchange with Examiner this afternoon, Connecticut Carry President Rich Burgess said next week will see an effort by Connecticut gun owners to “ramp up the pressure on the legislature.”

Part of that effort may already be underway. On its Facebook page today, Connecticut Carry urges gun owners to write state legislators and tell them “about how you feel about being disarmed in the face of these kinds events.”

Today’s “objective of activism,” according to the group’s Facebook message, is to send those thoughts “to every member of the state legislature,” and to help in that endeavor, the organization has put all of those e-mail addresses into a cut-and-paste format here.

Burgess famously called on the legislature last week to enforce the law or repeal it. In his e-mail, he suggested that, “the state does not have the balls to enforce this law.”

Various news reports and blogs over the past several days estimate anywhere between 50,000 and 350,000 Connecticut citizens have failed to register their so-called “assault weapons,” which could put them in serious legal trouble.

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Connecticut; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: banglist; connecticut; facebook; florida
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
But the judge then said that a ban on such firearms is justified in the state’s efforts to reduce violence, according to the Hartford Courant.

Scary!

1 posted on 03/17/2014 9:42:52 AM PDT by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kenny
a home invasion by an on-line southwest Florida news service

Dang - now the REPORTERS are coming after us?

2 posted on 03/17/2014 9:45:40 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenny
 photo Connecticutcopmastercopy_zps8556d866.jpg

“You haf been odered to turn in ze veapons. If you fail to comply, as your MASTER, I vill follow MY oders und send heavily armed stormtroopers – er – officers to your home und remove zem by force. YOU HAF BEEN VARNED!!”


3 posted on 03/17/2014 9:47:48 AM PDT by Dick Bachert (Ignorance is NOT BLISS. It is the ROAD TO SERFDOM! We're on a ROAD TRIP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenny

Why do you hate Dave Workman?


4 posted on 03/17/2014 9:48:48 AM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenny

They never go after the violent criminals. They always go after the honest, non-violent people.

Why?
Cuz the non-violent people don’t vote democrat. Nuff said.


5 posted on 03/17/2014 9:51:03 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible traitors. Complicit in the destruction of our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

“Constitution State” my ass.....


6 posted on 03/17/2014 9:52:45 AM PDT by clintonh8r (Don't twerk me, Broi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

But, but Danniel Mallof said the people of CT support his gun laws.


7 posted on 03/17/2014 9:53:16 AM PDT by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

> They never go after the violent criminals. They always go after the honest, non-violent people.

Why?
Cuz the non-violent people don’t vote democrat. Nuff said.

And they’re a lot easier to catch because the’re not running, hiding or lying.


8 posted on 03/17/2014 9:53:32 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

i.e. Gun control nazis. Ooops. I mean gun safety advocates.


9 posted on 03/17/2014 9:58:39 AM PDT by rktman (Ethnicity: Redneck. Race: Daytona 500)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r

Men like Roger Sherman must be spinning in their graves!


10 posted on 03/17/2014 10:01:34 AM PDT by Dick Bachert (Ignorance is NOT BLISS. It is the ROAD TO SERFDOM! We're on a ROAD TRIP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001; I want the USA back

...and to this point, the non-violent ones are reluctant to shoot back.

Then again, guess if they did that, they would no longer by non-violent...lol


11 posted on 03/17/2014 10:02:31 AM PDT by jimjohn (You don't get the kind of government you want, or the kind you need. You get the kind you deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kenny

I heard it was Clint Eastwood who declared that peaceful, honest people turning in their guns is akin to getting castrated because your neighbor has too many kids!


12 posted on 03/17/2014 10:03:42 AM PDT by Dick Bachert (Ignorance is NOT BLISS. It is the ROAD TO SERFDOM! We're on a ROAD TRIP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenny

The Guv and Legislators of Connecticutt never study their own histiry. HAHA!

“The Sons of Liberty make no scruple of publickly [sic] declaring that they will fight to their knees in blood
rather than suffer the Stamp Act to be enforced...” p.365. 12 May 1766

“No advices received from Connecticut —the Inhabitants have deposed their governor and chosen another, turned out the members of the Assembly and have formed themselves into a committee of 500 men to oppose the present Stamp Act to be enforced...” May 19, 1766 p.367

“Montresor`s Journal”- Scull, edit.


13 posted on 03/17/2014 10:03:53 AM PDT by bunkerhill7 ("The Second Amendment has no limits on firepower"-NY State Senator Kathleen A. Marchione.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenny

My reaction to CT’s gun laws; rental storage in nearby Vermont and a permanent move to Idaho in three years. Better weather too.


14 posted on 03/17/2014 10:27:02 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (When I first read it, " Atlas Shrugged" was fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenny

When the first Connecticut SWAT team is disarmed and sent walking home in their underwear, THEN the legislature will get the message


15 posted on 03/17/2014 10:34:51 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

> Connecticut gun rights activists are using yesterday’s report of a home invasion by an on-line southwest Florida news service to bolster their opposition to the Constitution State’s new gun control law, and today Reason.com is reporting that one police agency is conducting an internal investigation of an officer who said he would like to “bang down your door and come after your gun.”

Thanks Kenny.


16 posted on 03/17/2014 10:39:59 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kenny
"But the judge then said that a ban on such firearms is justified in the state’s efforts to reduce violence"

In other words: The State is justified in its efforts to reduce violence by passing a law that may increase violence by the State.

17 posted on 03/17/2014 10:52:01 AM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

It also falls under the rule: “we have to do something. Anything! Pass a law quick. Any law. We don’t care. So that the mind numb voters will think that we are doing something about the problem.”


18 posted on 03/17/2014 10:52:55 AM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345
"We have to protect our phoney baloney jobs here, gentlemen! We must do something about this immediately! Immediately! Immediately! Harrumph! Harrumph! Harrumph!"


19 posted on 03/17/2014 10:55:39 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods

Make it sooner. Time is short.


20 posted on 03/17/2014 10:56:56 AM PDT by Noumenon (Resistance. Restoration. Retribution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson