Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Missing plane sent signals to satellite for hours
AP.org ^ | Mar 13, 7:57 PM EDT | By CHRIS BRUMMITT and JOAN LOWY

Posted on 03/13/2014 7:38:46 PM PDT by gooblah

KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia (AP) -- A Malaysia Airlines plane sent signals to a satellite for four hours after the aircraft went missing, an indication that it was still flying for hundreds of miles or more, a U.S. official briefed on the search said Thursday.

Six days after the plane with 239 people aboard disappeared, Malaysian authorities expanded their search westward toward India, saying the aircraft may have flown for several hours after its last contact with the ground shortly after takeoff from Kuala Lumpur for Beijing.

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iran; malaysia; mh370; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 261-279 next last
To: barmag25

If the fuel loading was accurate. One guy in the ground could easily load more fuel. If that happened the pilots were in on it - whatever it is.


81 posted on 03/13/2014 8:49:02 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
What is the absolute minimum 777 landing strip length?

I've googled it, and I've come up with nothing.

The wings-level, sea-level stall speed is typically close to 137 knots, apparently.

82 posted on 03/13/2014 8:51:14 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: virgil
Exactly, in the modern era with all of the communications, ATC radar, the avionics etc and with spy satellites, search planes, and all other equipment, how does this plane elude the world for a week?
83 posted on 03/13/2014 8:52:33 PM PDT by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

Not without going awful close to the Indian coast. Indian radar would have picked it up. The range is limited. It couldn’t fly just anywhere.


84 posted on 03/13/2014 8:53:00 PM PDT by bigdaddy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
What is the absolute minimum 777 landing strip length?

777 yards. Obviously.

85 posted on 03/13/2014 8:53:41 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious! We reserve the right to serve refuse to anyone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

Thats the big mystery. But if one of the pilots decided to turn all the transponders off, take a left turn, and fly off into the middle of the Indian Ocean.... good luck finding it. Its and awful big ocean. Thats my guess by the way (if i have to make one). One pilot incapacitates the other, and off into the wild blue yonder they go.


86 posted on 03/13/2014 8:55:25 PM PDT by bigdaddy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

Some of the crew may have been involved, too. Passengers may not have known they were hijacked until it was too late.


87 posted on 03/13/2014 8:56:24 PM PDT by virgil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: bigdaddy45

If it was hijacked and landed, the passengeers were not part of the plan. They were either killed or made to jump out of the plane over the Indian ocean.

If a hijacking, I’m betting that automatic weapons were smuggled on board. No boxcutters this time.

We need to find this plane.


88 posted on 03/13/2014 8:56:53 PM PDT by Delta Dawn (Fluent in two languages: English and cursive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
[The minimum landing strip required] is 777 yards. Obviously.

You....are joking...?

89 posted on 03/13/2014 8:57:11 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

Comment #90 Removed by Moderator

To: Viennacon

Relatively easy to incapacitate over 200 passengers??? How exactly? The only hijacking scenario i can think of is if one of the pilots does it by taking out the other with no one knowing. They’re flying in the middle of the night, and none of the passengers really know anything is wrong.


91 posted on 03/13/2014 8:57:44 PM PDT by bigdaddy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
So she was prolly loaded with fuel permitting a range of 3,600 miles or so...?

Given the number of claims that have been made and later denied regarding this flight do we really know how much fuel it was carrying? It is certainly possible to load a 777 with enough for a much longer flight. Has anyone actually checked the records at KL and if they have, can those records be trusted? After the Malaysians had piously claimed they were checking all possibilities they are now denying searching the pilot and copilot's homes. If this was a planned crew-jacking, as now seems possible, might co-conspirator(s) in the ground crew have loaded more fuel than needed for the official flight plan? That might be the easiest lead to follow.

92 posted on 03/13/2014 8:58:02 PM PDT by JohnBovenmyer (Obama been Liberal. Hope Change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bigdaddy45

Under the radar, im talking


93 posted on 03/13/2014 8:58:24 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

depends on if it is fully loaded....but it the takeoff length of a runway is always longer than the landing length. I’d guess about 8,000 feet as a minimum to land one. You need about 12000 feet to take off fully loaded.


94 posted on 03/13/2014 8:58:37 PM PDT by superfries
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Delta Dawn

How do you “make passengers jump out of a plane over the Indian Ocean”??? Just tell them to line up and jump? You don’t think over 200 passengers are going to fight back??? Sheeeesh.


95 posted on 03/13/2014 8:59:22 PM PDT by bigdaddy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: gooblah

speculation and theories that have NO verifiable data. Unnamed sources from unnamed ‘agencies’ are meaningless.

For whatever else we know of this we can be sure...1) there is a plane missing and 2)it will not end well


96 posted on 03/13/2014 9:00:06 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

I fear the final destination will be Israel.


97 posted on 03/13/2014 9:00:37 PM PDT by Texas Songwriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bigdaddy45

I assume there is access to the ventilation system through avionics. You don’t think the pilots could smuggle gas masks and knockout gas grenades on board? That is what I’d do if I was trying to hijack it.


98 posted on 03/13/2014 9:01:11 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: bigdaddy45

People who don’t know where something’s at send out search party’s of 40-50 ships and 40-50 aircraft to search. Someone knows exactly where something’s at sends out one ship. The US Navy sent one ship there today.


99 posted on 03/13/2014 9:01:36 PM PDT by barmag25 (Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? NO!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: barmag25

Do you think they could make it to Somalia? Then fly over Saudia Arabia or the Gulf and into Israeli air-space?


100 posted on 03/13/2014 9:02:19 PM PDT by Texas Songwriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 261-279 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson