[KC_Lion]

I am honestly starting to think gun stores in Nevada are behind this.

They will make an absolute mint!

[Polynikes]

I doubt that. You may be able to purchase the firearm in Nevada but it would need to be transferred/shipped to a FFL in CA to actually taken possession of the gun so long as it is CA approved. If the firearm is not on the “roster” (the officially approved list of fire arms able to be sold in CA)then you are SOL.

Manufacturers such as Ruger are letting their products expire and drop off the list and not be renewed. Berreta and Glock look like they will follow in kind. This micro stamping debacle is less about safety or crime prevention than it is about a back door scheme to dry up the supply of firearms in CA and make what does end up as approved be too expensive for an average citizen to afford.

Think of the micro stamping law as a modern legal throwback to The Army/Navy laws of the late 1860’s and instead of disarming slaves,freedmen and Negroes it works against the common man and for his owners/rulers aka the political class and assorted exempted groups .

http://www.old-yankee.com/rkba/racial_laws.html

[vette6387]

“I am honestly starting to think gun stores in Nevada are behind this.

They will make an absolute mint!”

As a CA resident, you cannot buy a new non-CA compliant handgun in Nevada. Nevada gun stores can sell directly to residents of any bordering state with the exception of CA. All NV sales have to be transacted through a CA FFL. What I am wondering though, is about “used” guns.

[Elsie]

Now the police will be able to tell which one of THEM shot the bad guy!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VqomZQMZQCQ