Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KC_Lion
I doubt that. You may be able to purchase the firearm in Nevada but it would need to be transferred/shipped to a FFL in CA to actually taken possession of the gun so long as it is CA approved. If the firearm is not on the “roster” (the officially approved list of fire arms able to be sold in CA)then you are SOL.

Manufacturers such as Ruger are letting their products expire and drop off the list and not be renewed. Berreta and Glock look like they will follow in kind. This micro stamping debacle is less about safety or crime prevention than it is about a back door scheme to dry up the supply of firearms in CA and make what does end up as approved be too expensive for an average citizen to afford.

Think of the micro stamping law as a modern legal throwback to The Army/Navy laws of the late 1860’s and instead of disarming slaves,freedmen and Negroes it works against the common man and for his owners/rulers aka the political class and assorted exempted groups .

http://www.old-yankee.com/rkba/racial_laws.html

8 posted on 03/12/2014 3:09:20 PM PDT by Polynikes (What would Walt Kowalski do. In the meantime "GET OFF MY LAWN")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Polynikes

next the state legislators will start complaining about neighboring states with “private party sales” leaking guns into Kali ala the New York state whining about Virginia et al.

they are never satisfied until only the gangs and cops (the same thing really) have guns.


9 posted on 03/12/2014 3:13:50 PM PDT by telstar12.5 (...always bring gunships to a gun fight...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson