Took a while to heal and fixed the ear up nicely. Source:
Posted on 03/08/2014 6:07:03 AM PST by Flotsam_Jetsome
So when did Ann's and Obama Sr.'s "whatever happened happened fast" wedding happen? For no apparent reason, confusion abounds among Obama's biographers over the wedding date:
1. Dreams claims that Ann and Obama Sr. were in married "in 1960"; similarly, Mendell's 2007 book claims that the couple were married "sometime in late 1960" when they "slipped off alone to the island of Maui"; and both Obamaland (2008) by Ron Jacobs (with contributor David Maraniss) and a 2007 Washington Post article claim that the two were married "late in 1960."
2. A 2007 Chicago Tribune article vaguely claims that Ann and Obama Sr. were married "six months before" Barack's birth on Aug 4, 1961 -- or, in other words, sometime in early 1961.
3. An April 2008 Time article by Amanda Ripley, as does Maraniss's August 2008 article, gives a specific date of February 2, 1961 for the wedding, apparently based on Ann's and Obama Sr.'s 1964 divorce records – mysteriously appearing on the web. But since fake documents have been known to appear on the web, Obama's biographers, Ripley and Maraniss, might want to verify the 1964 divorce documents – especially since a Feb. 2, 1961 marriage date for "Ann and Obama Sr." wasn't reported in any Honolulu Advertiser or Honolulu Star-Bulletin marriage lists from February 1961. Take the February 8, 1961 Star-Bulletin, which listed eighteen marriages from Feb. 3, Feb. 4, and Feb. 6, and no Feb. 2 marriages, and the February 7, 1961 Advertiser, which listed eleven marriages from Feb. 2 to 4, including two Feb. 2 marriages.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Took a while to heal and fixed the ear up nicely. Source:
Very significant damage and very strang location, too. Looks like knife/machete cuts, not that I am a doctor or anything. I wonder if there are suture marks, or if there would be.
I’m gonna wait till after the “universe shattering” evidence first— that woman is expensive, “very expensive”. she wants 200.00 per hour with a 4 hrs minimum just to look at it, and 5 grand (deposit) for “out of town evidence collection”. What is needed is the out of town evidence collection.
You know what Free Republic needs, is a place to donate funds for a cracker jack BOOTS ON THE GROUND detective and document expert. Someone that can retrieve paper documents, and solid evidence that will hold up in the court of law, not Computer images..Wonder if the owner of Free Republic would do something like that?
Meanwhile zero has spent millions to keep his background hidden. How much are you planning to raise?
I would like to see Free Republic have its own boots on the ground detective, and document expert. The owner of Free Republic could open a separate donation for it and handle the funds..I have no idea how much it would raise..Maybe he already knows a good detective and doc expert- i would donate to it..
Nerks,
I’m sifting thru your recent posts, trying to figure out ‘what I’ve missed’ in recent weeks.
What’s the latest on these photos, and your recent analysis, eg:
“And I keep asking, who is that dark boy who is old enough to almost reach her waist? He looks to be about five years old. Mark was born in 1965, the image therefor has to be dated from 1966. So once again, who is the dark boy who had to have a birth year of 1961?
No one wants to go there. All they keep doing is telling me the child she’s holding is ‘David’ - well, sorry, but if that dark boy isn’t Mark, as HE maintains, then who the heck are we looking at?
It’s got to be his muslim half at work.”
I don’t see what it is you are asking, but here’s a clue:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2465278/posts?page=823#823
I'll ask Brown Deer handle this one - I don't do Martha Trowbridge
“I don’t do Martha Trowbridge.”
Hahahaha!
Don’t blame you.
and Moochelle looks older than that 70 year old woman in the back. ;-)
Thought you might spot that...there’s no end to Martha and her drive for hits and paying subscribers, is there?
That picture seems so much more correct!
Adding him also added a tree!
Scenarios, given Kenya rules about bigamy and citizenship that you outlined:
1) 0 born Kenya:
0 SR couldn’t pass UK citizenship to 0 due to bigamy law, and SADO couldn’t pass U.S. citizenship to 0 because she was married in U.S. view, and was too young to convey citizenship.
2) 0 born in Canada
Did Canada have similar rules as Kenya?
If so, 0 would be neither Canadian nor American.
Maybe this is part of the reason for the forged documents.
Did you see that?
Right down to the little kick at the end of the final ‘m’
_________________
I did and you’re right, as usual. :)
HA! That sure is weird. I can see it, but I can’t believe I saw it. If you know what I mean.
I hear ya!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.