Is there any doubt that the US is behind all of these "peaceful protests" that have toppled governments and left nothing but the destruction of civilization in their place? The only question is who stands to benefit from all of this.
Dennis Kucinich is far left, for sure. The ptb also dismiss the far right. In most ways the far left and the far right are closer to each other than they are to the muck in the middle, both parties.
Do I support Dennis Kucinich? You bet I do. When I encountered something that was an absolute need for veterans, he was on it and got it done. He was even on the phone from the floor of the HOR to me while this initiative was being passed.
And something else. Kucinich's district was dismantled with Republicans in charge of redistricting. It was split between mostly Akron and Toledo. It was a district that the 'pubs could've had when Kucinich stepped down. He was the only one who fought for jobs for Cleveland. Doesn't it tell you something that both dems and 'pubs are still in the game of destroying a decent man?
End of rant. Except for one PS: a lot of what saved Cleveland from being Newark or Detroit is stuff he put in place as mayor and in the HOR.
Ron Paul liked him and he was against the invasion of Iraq.
No further argument is needed for a wide swathe of freepers.
Then there is the possibility and high probability that America has almost nothing to do with the developments in Ukraine.
The rule is reversion to the mean. The mean is Russian hegemony over Ukraine. Those that hold an Amerocentric view that all world events vectors have a strong American component are pretty much wrong in this instance.
Bert’s rule is that history is a process, not an event. What we see now is but two or three events in the historical process of reversion to the mean of Russian hegemony.