Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

So it begins.
1 posted on 02/26/2014 2:54:03 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

When liberals discriminate, it’s called “freedom of choice”. When conservatives do it, it’s “discrimination”.


2 posted on 02/26/2014 2:55:57 PM PST by SkyDancer (I Believe In The Law Until It Intereferes With Justice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Is Texas ready to tell the USSC to bug off yet? Until the corrupt courts no longer have a say then America is going to continue its downward spiral.


3 posted on 02/26/2014 2:56:51 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Let him come and enforce it

I don't read anywhere that the ENUMERATED POWERS of the Constitution reserve that power to the feds

5 posted on 02/26/2014 3:00:11 PM PST by Mr. K (If you like your constitution, you can keep it...Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

And so...

The Texas voters will provide a resolution for the next cycle that says

the Federal Court decision is OF NO EFFECT in the State of Texas according to the voice of the people.

Damn. Who do we have to draft this resolution?.


6 posted on 02/26/2014 3:00:35 PM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Vox populi is the rule of Law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FReepers

Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can

7 posted on 02/26/2014 3:02:50 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yep. There is no more “united states”. There is now one state with one set of laws. I still contend the only solution is to go our own way.


8 posted on 02/26/2014 3:03:56 PM PST by VerySadAmerican (".....Barrack, and the horse Mohammed rode in on.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
What?

You didn't see that obvious clause ... immediately following the guaranteed right to kill in vitro babies ?

It's right there before your lieing eyes.

9 posted on 02/26/2014 3:06:00 PM PST by knarf (I say things that are true .. I have no proof .. but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

They will not rest until every Christian in America has baked a cake for the special occasion.


12 posted on 02/26/2014 3:08:29 PM PST by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This will be a boon to divorce lawyers.


16 posted on 02/26/2014 3:12:52 PM PST by Dalberg-Acton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This is going get good LOL!


19 posted on 02/26/2014 3:19:03 PM PST by SevenofNine (We are Freepers, all your media bases belong to us ,resistance is futile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
So it begins.

Begins?

(from 1986)

But the proper reaction to crimes committed against homosexual persons should not be to claim that the homosexual condition is not disordered. When such a claim is made and when homosexual activity is consequently condoned, or when civil legislation is introduced to protect behavior to which no one has any conceivable right, neither the Church nor society at large should be surprised when other distorted notions and practices gain ground, and irrational and violent reactions increase.

Texas may prove the Vatican correct on this matter.

20 posted on 02/26/2014 3:19:26 PM PST by markomalley (Nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good -- Leo XIII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Discrimination (freedom to choose) is our God-given right and duty. Individuals and businesses have every right to discriminate however they want. There's nothing wrong with personal discrimination.

State laws requiring segregation of blacks from whites are another matter and are unconstitutional (14th Amendment). The feds have a Constitutional right to interfere with state laws that require segregation of blacks from whites.

However, the feds have no other Constitutional authority to interfere with any other form of discrimination on the state level and the feds have no Constitutional authority whatsoever to interfere with the God given right of individuals and businesses to exercise their freedom of discrimination (freedom to choose) as they see fit.

22 posted on 02/26/2014 3:21:40 PM PST by PapaNew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Why do we even bother to pass laws anymore?


23 posted on 02/26/2014 3:28:47 PM PST by animal172 (Calling Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Without a rational relation to a legitimate governmental purpose, state-imposed inequality can find no refuge in our United States Constitution,”

What does that language have to do with what the Constitution says?

Nothing.

It comes straight out of the lawyerly language formulas taught in law schools for promoting what is “Constitutional” not by what the Constitution says but by what the judges “living Constitution” says in accordance with those legal argument formulas.


24 posted on 02/26/2014 3:31:23 PM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Someone(God) should strike down the a-hole judge!


27 posted on 02/26/2014 3:36:32 PM PST by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

What is the rational basis then, to prohibit polygamy, bestiality?

Do you know the beastiality laws now are not based on morality? Only animal cruelty. If you are kind to your dog why can’t you marry it?


29 posted on 02/26/2014 3:45:27 PM PST by Williams (No Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Tell the judge to go F himself.These bastards have no fear.


30 posted on 02/26/2014 3:46:49 PM PST by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
“Without a rational relation to a legitimate governmental purpose, state-imposed inequality can find no refuge in our United States Constitution,” wrote Judge Orlando L. Garcia of United States District Court

It is not "inequality" nor is it "state imposed" or "imposed" at all - it's called language, judge. It simply is what it is. Two men cannot be husband and wife, nor can two women. By definition. Language, judge. Reality, judge.

31 posted on 02/26/2014 4:03:12 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This will not last, if Texas still has any cajones.


37 posted on 02/26/2014 4:40:10 PM PST by JSDude1 (Defeat Hagan, elect a Constutional Conservative: Dr. Greg Brannon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The United Gay States of America. It’s who we are now.


39 posted on 02/26/2014 5:04:06 PM PST by CincyRichieRich (Bloom right where you are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson