Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCOTUS Rejects NRA Challenges To Gun Law Age Limits
http://personalliberty.com ^ | february 25, 2014

Posted on 02/25/2014 5:15:40 PM PST by lowbridge

The Supreme Court on Monday rejected two National Rifle Association challenges to laws that ban gun permits to people under 21.

The rejections came in one-line orders without comment.

One of the rejected cases brought by the NRA challenged a Texas law that bans those under 21 from getting a gun permit.

The other NRA challenge was to a Federal law that restricts selling handguns to people under 21.

“Given the number of laws enacted by the federal government, states, and localities in the years when a mistaken understanding of the Second Amendment held sway, one would have expected a major reconsideration of extant firearms laws to have occurred,” the NRA stated in its petition for the second case.

In both cases, NRA vs. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and NRA vs. McCraw, lower courts had upheld the laws.

NBC noted that Texas’s defense of its law in the Supreme Court put State Attorney General Greg Abbott in the uncomfortable position of opposing the NRA while running for Governor.

(Excerpt) Read more at personalliberty.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: banglist; bhoscotus; docket; guns; lawsuit; scotus; secondamendnent; texas

1 posted on 02/25/2014 5:15:40 PM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Uphere we just ignore these communists and teach are kids at age 8 how to hit, at 1/4 mile with a scoped 22, 6 inches from a groundhog and make him jump back in his hole.


2 posted on 02/25/2014 5:20:01 PM PST by bunkerhill7 ("The Second Amendment has no limits on firepower"-NY State Senator Kathleen A. Marchione.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

5 to 4 - how did the individual justices vote?


3 posted on 02/25/2014 5:22:18 PM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
Age limits are generally statutory law, not constitutional rights. This is maybe a minor setback, but not much of one.
4 posted on 02/25/2014 5:22:21 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
So we can draft boys when they're 18, teach 'em how to kill, arm them, and send them off to a foreign land with high powered rifles, grenades, tanks, etc but they can't own a gun in their own home country?

Yep, makes perfect sense ......(/sarcasm)

5 posted on 02/25/2014 5:41:25 PM PST by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

No you misread the article (admittedly it was not written clearly), that refers to the two most recent gun rights cases (last one decided in 2010). This was simply a refusal to hear the cases involved. In other words cert was not granted


6 posted on 02/25/2014 6:12:54 PM PST by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

“NBC noted that Texas’s defense of its law in the Supreme Court put State Attorney General Greg Abbott in the uncomfortable position of opposing the NRA while running for Governor.”

Wait a minute! According to Holder the AG wouldn’t have to enforce this law if he found it offensive or immoral or whatever. Right? If he didn’t like it he doesn’t have to enforce it according to Holder!


7 posted on 02/25/2014 6:13:04 PM PST by Castigar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Castigar
Wait a minute! According to Holder the AG wouldn’t have to enforce this law if he found it offensive or immoral or whatever. Right?

The Dims should have given this a thought or two or two BEFORE allowing such tripe.

They won't be in office forever and it erodes the rule of laaw for the next party to act accordingly since it set an "precedent"

(Just waiting for next elections and drooling for "non enforcemnet" of lota of federal gun laws.")

Of course this just paves the way for the first American Dictator who will use it with "extreme prejudice"
8 posted on 02/25/2014 6:32:55 PM PST by RedMonqey ("Gun-free zones" equal "Target-rich environment.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7

Do like we did, borrow daddy’s .22 and ping away. We didn’t need anyone’s permission. After all, I was eight years old.


9 posted on 02/26/2014 2:31:27 AM PST by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7

Do like we did, borrow daddy’s .22 and ping away. We didn’t need anyone’s permission. After all, I was eight years old.


10 posted on 02/26/2014 2:32:55 AM PST by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: billhilly

There goes my keyboard stutter again.


11 posted on 02/26/2014 2:33:50 AM PST by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
5 to 4 - how did the individual justices vote?

It takes 4 votes to agree to hear a case; in this instance, there were no recorded dissents from the decision not to hear the case. Meaning either that the decision not to hear the case was 9-0, or that there were 3 or fewer Justices who wanted to hear it but who didn't bother recording their dissents.

12 posted on 02/27/2014 12:05:48 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: usconservative
So we can draft boys when they're 18, teach 'em how to kill, arm them, and send them off to a foreign land with high powered rifles, grenades, tanks, etc but they can't own a gun in their own home country?

That's a good argument to make to the Texas State Legislature as to why they should change the law; it's not a great argument to make to the Supreme Court. Just because a law is stupid doesn't make it unconstitutional.

13 posted on 02/27/2014 12:07:46 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
Just because a law is stupid doesn't make it unconstitutional.

and just because a law is unconstitutional doesn't mean the USSC will overturn it .....

14 posted on 02/27/2014 2:36:11 PM PST by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: usconservative
So we can draft boys when they're 18, teach 'em how to kill, arm them, and send them off to a foreign land with high powered rifles, grenades, tanks, etc but they can't own a gun in their own home country?

I couldn't legally drink beer here in Michigan until I got home in Jan. 1972, at the age of 21, after serving almost 3 years in the Army............

15 posted on 02/27/2014 2:55:05 PM PST by Hot Tabasco (Occam's razor was made by Gillette)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson