Posted on 02/25/2014 5:15:40 PM PST by lowbridge
The Supreme Court on Monday rejected two National Rifle Association challenges to laws that ban gun permits to people under 21.
The rejections came in one-line orders without comment.
One of the rejected cases brought by the NRA challenged a Texas law that bans those under 21 from getting a gun permit.
The other NRA challenge was to a Federal law that restricts selling handguns to people under 21.
Given the number of laws enacted by the federal government, states, and localities in the years when a mistaken understanding of the Second Amendment held sway, one would have expected a major reconsideration of extant firearms laws to have occurred, the NRA stated in its petition for the second case.
In both cases, NRA vs. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and NRA vs. McCraw, lower courts had upheld the laws.
NBC noted that Texass defense of its law in the Supreme Court put State Attorney General Greg Abbott in the uncomfortable position of opposing the NRA while running for Governor.
(Excerpt) Read more at personalliberty.com ...
Uphere we just ignore these communists and teach are kids at age 8 how to hit, at 1/4 mile with a scoped 22, 6 inches from a groundhog and make him jump back in his hole.
5 to 4 - how did the individual justices vote?
Yep, makes perfect sense ......(/sarcasm)
No you misread the article (admittedly it was not written clearly), that refers to the two most recent gun rights cases (last one decided in 2010). This was simply a refusal to hear the cases involved. In other words cert was not granted
“NBC noted that Texass defense of its law in the Supreme Court put State Attorney General Greg Abbott in the uncomfortable position of opposing the NRA while running for Governor.”
Wait a minute! According to Holder the AG wouldn’t have to enforce this law if he found it offensive or immoral or whatever. Right? If he didn’t like it he doesn’t have to enforce it according to Holder!
Do like we did, borrow daddy’s .22 and ping away. We didn’t need anyone’s permission. After all, I was eight years old.
Do like we did, borrow daddy’s .22 and ping away. We didn’t need anyone’s permission. After all, I was eight years old.
There goes my keyboard stutter again.
It takes 4 votes to agree to hear a case; in this instance, there were no recorded dissents from the decision not to hear the case. Meaning either that the decision not to hear the case was 9-0, or that there were 3 or fewer Justices who wanted to hear it but who didn't bother recording their dissents.
That's a good argument to make to the Texas State Legislature as to why they should change the law; it's not a great argument to make to the Supreme Court. Just because a law is stupid doesn't make it unconstitutional.
and just because a law is unconstitutional doesn't mean the USSC will overturn it .....
I couldn't legally drink beer here in Michigan until I got home in Jan. 1972, at the age of 21, after serving almost 3 years in the Army............
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.