Posted on 02/22/2014 11:21:49 PM PST by neverdem
Apparently not, since so many in Connecticut are flouting this one.
That having been said, the people of Connecticut voted for the overbearing jerks who came up with that garbage. Let them stew in their own pot for awhile. Maybe they'll think twice before just voting ticket and pulling the lever during their next election cycle.
I just hope the citizens of Connecticut wake up and dump the Marxists in Hartford, starting with Mallory. Ella Gras so, who I knew personally is rolling over in her grave with these Libs. No, Ella was no conservative, but she wasto the right of Mallory (and to the right of Rell).
“I think at this point a mention of the 1986 gun control act might be appropriate.”
Two interesting facts to add:
1. the act also contained a provision banning the ownership of any fully automatic firearms not registered by May 19, 1986. That provision was slipped into the legislation as an 11th hour amendment by Rep. William J. Hughes, a New Jersey Democrat.
2. President Ronald Reagan signed it into law on May 19, 1986.
It's not that complicated. Imagine you're an infantryman in a defensive position. The first thing to understand is the difference between cover and concealment. Cover will protect you from direct fire. Concealment won't. Overhead cover can protect you from indirect fire.
It’s not just the 300k in Connecticut that should be given consideration. Almost one-tenth the population of the state as cited declined their invitation. They have extended support and should call upon that strength for staging purposes, rather than waiting for the fight coming to their individual doorstep.
Good point.
We'll have to wait and see where this goes
See post # 70.
...the consent of the governed.
Trying to decide between the Democrat or Progressive name is a waste of time. They call themselves these names because if they spoke truthfully and called themselves Communists they would lose a ton of elections. Course in a few troublesome states they would cheer in the streets saying, The revolution is here!
You are right about them thinking Progressives will protect them, but what they really want is a daddy that will tell them what to do. Life is way to complicated for these zombies. I hope when hunting season opens there is no bag limit....on geese I meant to say.
He's our leader so we must follow his example.
This is likely the cause of the continued social injustices there.
I have a couple of friends in CT that are now felons because of this law
I told them both that if they get in a sticky situation because of it, to call me and I’ll bring eveyone and everything I can to help defend them from this illegal law.
And no, I don’t mean a suitcase full of cash and a bevy of lawyers...
Amen.
more accurate:
...unless they are laws liberals don’t like.
I am surprised they think that 300,000 Nutmeggers own assault rifles. I think some lefty pulled that number out of his a$$ to scare the fellow citizens into thinking they live amongst that many gun nuts. That’s why they needed to pass the law in the first place. Doesn’t add up for such a deep blue state.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
