Other states need to follow promptly.
Wow, protecting personal conscience, what a concept.
Let’s see.
Choose to murder an unborn child - Okay
Choose to not perform a service because of personal conscience - Feel the boot heel of the government
How about ‘you can refuse service to anyone for any reason or lack thereof’ laws? Why do they need to be so specific?
aka freedom of association
Applying the civil rights legislation to private individuals was always grossly unconstitutional.
Good!!! I for one am sick and tired of all this Homo stuff.
Since the states have never amended the Constitution to expressly protect so-called gay rights, such “rights” now wrongly being legislated from the bench by activist judges, such a law would be constitutional as long it doesn’t also unreasonably abridge constitutionally enumerated rights.
Love the way they worded that title to make it sound bad. The bill was passed in order to protect businesses rights to practice the faith of the owners.
Good. No one should be forced to do anything in the name of “tolerance,” that is “one way” tolerance.
We have an individual responsibility too—to not attend same-sex weddings, even if it’s a family member. To do so is to express approval.
I think any honest liberal would agree with the law.
Kansas: AKA The Best State in the Union :)
why not do themselves a favor, a favor that will be harder for the courts to pick as an effort of attempting a single and specific “discrimination”
and broaden the ability to not provide service to ANYONE other than denial of service to a person among the classes of persons designated in the post-civil war amendments -
in other words, broaden the exceptions for which service could be denied legally, to any condition other than “race” (and I’d say race or religion), any condition that does not meet a moral or ethic standard held by the person who would otherwise be supplying the service
for some individuals that might include “same sex” couples, and for someone else it might include folks dressed in “goth” get ups, and for someone else - you get my idea
If the same set of rules were applied to those that did not believe Jesus is Lord, would you support their being denied entrance into a business or for some of the other conditions set here?
Curious to know people’s feelings on this.