And now Benghazi is neatly buried.
What's for lunch?
1 posted on
02/12/2014 9:07:15 AM PST by
Nachum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...
2 posted on
02/12/2014 9:07:45 AM PST by
Nachum
(Obamacare: It's. The. Flaw.)
To: Nachum
The GOPe and the Democrats = the same
3 posted on
02/12/2014 9:08:48 AM PST by
Viennacon
To: Nachum
What a load of crap from our fearless (ball less) GOP
4 posted on
02/12/2014 9:08:51 AM PST by
clamper1797
(Evil WILL flourish when good men WILL not act)
To: Nachum
Anybody ask the military what they think of this “GOP report”?
5 posted on
02/12/2014 9:10:07 AM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
(ObamaCare. The "global warming" of healthcare plans.)
To: Nachum
6 posted on
02/12/2014 9:10:30 AM PST by
VRWC For Truth
(Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
To: Nachum
Ya. Seems like the idiot GOP are shooting themselves in the foot.
This could be an issue for Hillary in 2016.
7 posted on
02/12/2014 9:11:13 AM PST by
dhs12345
To: Nachum
How would they know?
Answer: The GOP, authors of RomneyCARE/ObamaCARE
is also behind transfer of MANPADs to al Qaeda
as they kept the borders open.
To: Nachum
It’s only more lesser evil. We must vote GOP no matter what.
See the many psuedocons haunting FR for further details.
To: Nachum
What Difference Does It Make, after all? Thanks again, GOP. Why are we engaged in funding a War On Terror, again? Oh, that’s right. It makes us all “safer”. Puke.
11 posted on
02/12/2014 9:12:28 AM PST by
TADSLOS
(The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
To: Nachum
The Republican-authored reports findings are, by no means, a love letter to President Obama or then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. For example, the report concludes that U.S. personnel in Benghazi were woefully vulnerable in September 2012 because a) the administration did not direct a change in military force posture; b) there was no intelligence of a specific imminent threat in Libya; and c) the Department of State, which has primary responsibility for diplomatic security, favored a reduction of Department of Defense security personnel in Libya before the attack. The balance of the report contains many such harsh judgments of the Obama administration, the State Department, and the intelligence community. However, as ThinkProgress notes, the report does undermine It sounds like ThinkProgress scanned the report looking for any sliver of good news, and people around here are helping them trumpet that over the whole of the report.
I think I'll read the report myself before I let ThinkProgress and Mediaite make me their Pavlovian dog.
14 posted on
02/12/2014 9:14:26 AM PST by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: Nachum
OK then lets remove the military presence from all of our embassies. /s
15 posted on
02/12/2014 9:15:25 AM PST by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: Nachum
So, what do we do with Gregory Hicks? The senior state department official in Libya told the committee that the military guys standing beside him were told to stand down.
Do we just erase that?
18 posted on
02/12/2014 9:16:17 AM PST by
Bryan24
(When in doubt, move to the right..........)
To: Nachum
The attack on the U.S. diplomatic post in BenghaziIt was not a U.S. diplomatic post. It was a secret CIA base that was transferring Libyan weapons to Christian killing Al-CIA-duh jihad mercenaries in Syria. The GOP leadership is all for the take-down of Syria. This is the reason for the cover up.
19 posted on
02/12/2014 9:17:23 AM PST by
Count of Monte Fisto
(The foundation of modern society is the denial of reality.)
To: Nachum
They concluded as much without talking to the key witnesses. That’s interesting. This was “our team” right?
Boehner sucks!
20 posted on
02/12/2014 9:17:53 AM PST by
Tenacious 1
(My whimsical litany of satyric prose and avarice pontification of wisdom demonstrates my concinnity.)
To: Nachum
What a bunch of self-serving, appeasing BS tripe!
Did they just push out a paper report from their butt, or did they actually stand in front of somebody and have to stand up for and justify their conclusions?
I’ve said here often that you cannot trust anything anyone from any agency or part of this Federal Government says.
Apparently, that goes for so-called Republican or opposition interests, too. It actually appears to me that anyone within 50 miles of DC is a traitor or conspirator.
21 posted on
02/12/2014 9:18:00 AM PST by
Gaffer
(Comprehensive Immigration Reform is just another name for Comprehensive Capitulation)
To: Nachum
Nothing to see here, move along!
22 posted on
02/12/2014 9:19:04 AM PST by
zerosix
(Native Sunflower)
To: Nachum
A couple retired SEALs stopped the attack dead in its tracks for several hours, but the full might of the US military wouldn’t have accomplished anything?
Remarkable.
23 posted on
02/12/2014 9:19:48 AM PST by
null and void
(<--- unwilling cattle-car passenger on the bullet train to serfdom)
To: Nachum
It might be that no “stand down” order was provided. If Obama does nothing isn’t that thhe equivalent of a “stand down” order? I also dont believe we know that the outcome would not have changed if the military had acted. That is complete BS. The attack lasted hours.
To: Nachum
My BS meter just pegged.
25 posted on
02/12/2014 9:21:57 AM PST by
Balata
(Obama is a Lying Fraud, and so are his followers!)
To: Nachum
What did Hillary promise to the RINO elite to let this annoying Benghazi thing go away?
27 posted on
02/12/2014 9:23:57 AM PST by
BuffaloJack
(Freedom isn't free; nor is it easy.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson