Bevin, I think, can learn from the experience. McConnell has demonstrated by repeated action that he cannot or will not.
I think that just points at an oppotunistic person rather than an evil one .... and opportunistic is JUST what we have NOW.
My opinion.
As a whole, who would you rather have in the senate, Bevin or McConnell? I don’t expect any politician, even ones I support, to be ideologically pure. That’s too much expect. One thing is clear. McConnell has got to go.
A lot of people supported TARP out of Loyalty to the GOP, misguided loyalty they now know better as the GOP is their enemy now...
The GOP has lost a LOT of Loyalty recently because they have been stabbing so many people in the back...
Bevin is on Beck now - he has a very good explanation why his signature was on that commentary supporting TARP. In other words, its a BS charge.
McConnell may have been on our side in the past, but he clearly isn’t now. Also, thirty years in office is too long for anyone. If Bevin doesn’t win in the primaries, this could be the first time I ever vote for a Democrat.
Just listened to him on Beck, According to Bevin, by law he had to sign it to vouch for the financial figures, not the comentary. Had he not signed, or tried to alter/modify commentary he would have been in deep doodoo with the regulatory scum, aka Sarbains/Oxley.
This has got that BASTARD ROVE’S fingerprints all over it.
pOlitico is a sewer pond for journolists
So, as a president of a fund Bevin was responsible to his investors. And their money was at risk due to the malfeasance and IMO criminal malfeasance of both government and bank regulators.
So Bevin was supposed to come out against TARP which was passed to insure his investors?
What is Bevin's position on what should happen to the Banksters that pulled this heist on the American people? Is he for prosecution?
What was McConnell's excuse?
Hmmmm, I wonder which person in the McConnell camp leaked this to Politico.