Posted on 02/10/2014 5:23:42 PM PST by Nachum
Submitted by Ron Paul of the Ron Paul Institute,
President Obamas state of the union pledge to act with or without Congress marks a milestone in presidential usurpation of Congressional authority. Most modern presidents have used executive orders to change and even create laws without Congressional approval. However President Obama is unusually brazen, in that most Presidents do not brag about their plans to rule by executive order in state of the union speeches.
Sadly, his pledge to use his pen to implement laws and polices without the consent of Congress not only received thunderous applause from representatives of the presidents party, some representatives have even pledged to help Obama get around Congress by providing him with ideas for executive orders. The Constitutions authors would be horrified to see legislators actively aiding and abetting a president taking power away from the legislature.
Executive orders are perfectly legitimate and even necessary if, in the words of leading Constitutional Scholar Judge Andrew Napolitano, they . guide the executive branch on how to enforce a law or complement and supplement what Congress has already done. The problem is that most modern presidents have abused this power to issue orders that, as Judge Napolitano puts it, restates federal law, or contradicts federal law, or does the opposite of what the federal law is supposed to do.
Political opponents of the president rightly condemned Obama for disregarding the Constitution. However, it was not that long ago that many of the same politicians were labeling as unpatriotic or worse anyone who dared question President Bushs assertions the he had the inherent authority to launch wars, spy on Americans, and even indefinitely detain American citizens.
Partisan considerations also make some members of the opposition party hesitate to reign in the president. These members are reluctant to set a
(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...
Maybe AG was really Santa.
Well, if you really knew how this site operated, from your 15 or so years here, you’d know that you could find my “born on” date by waving the cursor over my screen name. I didn’t own a personal computer or have Internet service back in the 1990s, which made it somewhat impossible to sign-up here back then. We’re not all millionaires like you are. LOL
You know that cheap scotch really isn’t good for you. I’d recommend a nice single malt or at least a better blended scotch than whatever no-name or store brand you’re drinking.
That's GOP code for "Nutless in D.C."
Sorry,I don’t drink.Never have and never will.
You sound silly or drunk vet.
Right back at ya X 10. Go sleep it off, Otis.
I think you have the wrong guy.
Oh, we can revoke it, alright.
The price is blood.
Don’t drink vet!You got the wrong guy.Sleep it off.Good night.
[ We’ve been trained to be this way. From Ann Barnhardt:
I dont care how many bee-ess college degrees you have, because all education today consists of is pumping and dumping information onto multiple-choice tests and occasionally faking a short-answer or occasional paper. That isnt education. Thats beta pack animals learning the gestures of submission to the alpha. ]
Nice to see another freeper here follows “Ann of Arc Barnhardt” besides myself.
>>The price is blood.
That won’t happen in this generation.
Imagine if GWB did this?
Nope.
Not really, our parents and grandparents paved the way for the future with the consistent election of semi-socialists as far back as 1958, or even earlier.
You know..?..
While I may disagree with 2DV about a couple of things, I can tell you for a fact that he's a net asset to FR.
You, on the other hand, are just the newest in a long line of n00bs claiming to have been here for years.
So STFU n00b.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.