OK. Let’s look at the defense put up by Hillary and Obama.
“Some people in the Middle East got mad about a video that was made about Muhammad, so they marched down and killed some Americans.”
Notice what it’s not. It’s not a defense of their actions before, during and after the attack. Why not? Wouldn’t they have been extremely scared of how their actions appeared? These are political experts and they are both lawyers. Wouldn’t their first concern have been to exonerate themselves? Instead, they talk, and they talk a LOT, about who was doing the killing. Why? Even on the political self-defense level, it makes no sense. And Hillary’s famous “What difference does it make?” statementisn’t about her response to the attack. She passionately tries to make the point that it doesn’t matter WHO killed the Americans. Ladies and gentlemen, these shyster lawyers are setting the courtroom up. When you are facing a Murder 1 charge and an Assault charge, you make damn sure you can beat the Murder 1 charge because that can get you the death penalty. Hillary and Obama are lawyers. They went to school to learn that. It makes a HUGE difference to them who is blamed for killing these four Americans. You see, their lives could depend on it. If Hillary and Obama provided support to the group that killed these four Americans, then they could be charged with treason. And treason can bring the death penalty. Do you still think it’s unusual that no one from this attack is in American custody? If they were caught, then their group could be identified. That group could then be linked to the actions of Hillary and Obama. This isn’t a couple of school kids caught smooching in the closet at school. Treason is serious business. And it’s not just serious to Hillary and Obama. It’s serious to the entire Democrat apparatus. Even the press has been hushing this up and that makes them accomplices.
DING! DING! DING!
WE HAVE A WINNER!
They also used the cheap attorney trick of “conditioned response”.
Telling an obvious lie over and over to get “the jury” to form it’s own opinion as to what the truth is.
In this case they kept repeating the lie the terrorist “spontaneously” responded to a protest in Egypt over a video.
Everyone was conditioned to say “there was no connection” to the video.
In reality the attack was planned then the video protest was planned to create the “spontaneous” lie.
No one was supposed to be killed, they were supposed to be taken hostage the same as with Jimmy Carter.
Since no one on “the jury” would believe the “spontaneous” lie “the jury” would be open for suggestions as to what did happen.
The Idea was to blame Mitt Romney and the repubs of collaborating with the terrorist to make Zippo look like Peanuts Carter.
Zippo wasn’t supposed to be reelected.
The hostages would have been released when Romney took office.
They were trying to create an “October Surprise II” for Hillary to run against Romney on in 2016.
People tend to forget Hillary is an attorney.
She’s not very good at it, but she is an attorney and she uses cheap attorney tricks to fool “the jury” which is the American people.
Hillary doesn’t even care if she fools every member of “the jury” just the people that matter the so called right wing opinion makers.
Elucidating the players shines light on the motives, and the motives inevitably wrap themselves around Obama and Clinton.
We're talking forty years in prison here, minimum. And that's if nobody gets really mad at them while they're on their way to Leavenworth.