DING! DING! DING!
WE HAVE A WINNER!
They also used the cheap attorney trick of “conditioned response”.
Telling an obvious lie over and over to get “the jury” to form it’s own opinion as to what the truth is.
In this case they kept repeating the lie the terrorist “spontaneously” responded to a protest in Egypt over a video.
Everyone was conditioned to say “there was no connection” to the video.
In reality the attack was planned then the video protest was planned to create the “spontaneous” lie.
No one was supposed to be killed, they were supposed to be taken hostage the same as with Jimmy Carter.
Since no one on “the jury” would believe the “spontaneous” lie “the jury” would be open for suggestions as to what did happen.
The Idea was to blame Mitt Romney and the repubs of collaborating with the terrorist to make Zippo look like Peanuts Carter.
Zippo wasn’t supposed to be reelected.
The hostages would have been released when Romney took office.
They were trying to create an “October Surprise II” for Hillary to run against Romney on in 2016.
People tend to forget Hillary is an attorney.
She’s not very good at it, but she is an attorney and she uses cheap attorney tricks to fool “the jury” which is the American people.
Hillary doesn’t even care if she fools every member of “the jury” just the people that matter the so called right wing opinion makers.
Hmmm...You lost me at “the idea was to blame Mitt Romney” and “zippy wasn’t supposed to be reelected”.
But I do agree with the diversionary tactics and also the theory that the witch and the doper were more interested in protecting their own @sses than they cared about American lives not their own.