Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Georgia, Tom Coburn Call for Constitutional Convention
Slate ^ | 2/6/14 | Dave Weigel

Posted on 02/07/2014 9:04:18 AM PST by taildragger

Two months ago, Emma Roller and I wrote about the possibly historic Assembly of the States in Mount Vernon. Momentum had been building oh-so-slowly on the right for a new, state-led constitutional convention, which could pass amendments far quicker than the Congress could. (And no one sees a scenario, any time soon, where there'll be 67 conservative votes in the Senate to pass amendments.) The reaction: Largely just a lot of doubt that this would come to anything.

(Excerpt) Read more at slate.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government
KEYWORDS: 17th; article5; corburn; levin; statesrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last
To: circlecity

It was suggested you do some research. There are rules for a Convention to propose amendments.

The first rule in a COS is that any amendment that passes must have approval of 2/3s of the states. That is itself is a tight control.

The second rule is that 3/4s of the states must ratify any passed amendment before the amendment becomes part of the Constitution. That is a high bar but not for conservatives. Conservatives still control the majority of the states.

A CC is called to draw up or revise a Constitution. A COS merely amends the existing Constitution if any amendment can get past 38 states.

There is NO CHANCE of a runaway convention. The rules are clear.


41 posted on 02/07/2014 10:04:06 AM PST by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

Here’s my proposal:

WHEREAS, the federal government has created a crushing national debt through improper and imprudent spending; and

WHEREAS, the federal government has invaded the legitimate roles of the states through the manipulative process of federal mandates, most of which are unfunded to a great extent; and

WHEREAS, the federal government has ceased to live under a proper interpretation of the Constitution of the United States; and

WHEREAS, it is the solemn duty of the states to protect the liberty of our people, particularly for the generations to come, by proposing amendments to the Constitution of the United States through a convention of the states under Article V of the United States Constitution to place clear restraints on these and related abuses of power.

THEREFORE, let is be resolved that henceforth, the Federal Government, and the Courts, shall actually follow the Constitution as it exists.


42 posted on 02/07/2014 10:04:48 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed ("Income Inequality?" Let's start with Washington DC vs. the rest of the nation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

I said at the “state level”. Do you have a reading problem? Apparently so!


43 posted on 02/07/2014 10:06:21 AM PST by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
"LIVs do not vote on amendments. States do. And more than 30 of the states are conservative."

There are plenty of LIVs populating State legislatures. Furthere there are plenty of "conservatives" that have thier liberal side. Many social conservatives are not necessarily economic conservatives and vice versa. Once a convention gets convened there's no limit to the wheeling and dealing which will take place. Would a staunch "pro-life" delagate be willing to trade the 2nd amendment for an anti-abortion amendment? Like I said, once the genie is out of the bottle there's no way to insure where this thing is going to go. I'm not saying don't do it but if you do then make sure your eyes are open.

44 posted on 02/07/2014 10:08:00 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
"The first rule in a COS is that any amendment that passes must have approval of 2/3s of the states. That is itself is a tight control. The second rule is that 3/4s of the states must ratify any passed amendment before the amendment becomes part of the Constitution. That is a high bar but not for conservatives. Conservatives still control the majority of the states."

So the only procedural and substantive guidance we have is the numbers necessary to open the convention and to pass amendments. That's not a lot to go on. Everything else is wide open.

45 posted on 02/07/2014 10:10:03 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: circlecity; Hostage
And what did it get us? The most liberal and anti-conservative Republican Speaker and House leadership ever. Again, be careful what you wish for.

Illogical and Defeatist.

What are you going to do, sit on the side of the road and cry?

Or elect more liberal representatives?

NO!

YOu get back into the fight and further crush the left out of the GOP.
46 posted on 02/07/2014 10:11:38 AM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

> “There are plenty of LIVs populating State legislatures.”

Not in the conservative states that were swept by the Teap Party groups in the 2010 elections.

It’s obvious you’re blowing smoke now.


47 posted on 02/07/2014 10:11:51 AM PST by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
"A CC is called to draw up or revise a Constitution. A COS merely amends the existing Constitution if any amendment can get past 38 states."

So, both use the same process to amend an existing constitution. I see no difference for a country that already has a constitution. The only fixed rules are the numbers required to begin and complete the process. Everything else is wide open.

48 posted on 02/07/2014 10:12:40 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

Your comment reads almost (but not quite as bad) like the super-ignorant ones on Slate. Please, I hope we have a higher order of member here on Free Republic.


49 posted on 02/07/2014 10:13:43 AM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

> “So the only procedural and substantive guidance we have is the numbers necessary to open the convention and to pass amendments. That’s not a lot to go on. Everything else is wide open.”

38 states is not a lot to go on? Make an appointment with your neurologist, there’s a concern showing here that you need to have your head examined.

> “Everything else is wide open.”

Yeah? Like what? Name one thing!


50 posted on 02/07/2014 10:14:30 AM PST by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
"Not in the conservative states that were swept by the Teap Party groups in the 2010 elections"

What did that accomplish in this regard? And I hate to inform you that we've had another election since 2010 and the Tea Party didn't accomplish jack in that election. You cannot control outcomes. "Fools rush in where wise men fear to tread."

51 posted on 02/07/2014 10:15:09 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

Some of what you are saying may or may not have any element of truth, but here’s the part that is certainly true: “If 3/4 of the states vote to pass any such amendment then it becomes part of the constitution.”

The other side of that is that if 1/4 of the states do not ratify some dumb-assed liberal proposal, it goes nowhere. I’m quite happy with this prospect.

Let’s get on with it.


52 posted on 02/07/2014 10:17:49 AM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
"Yeah? Like what? Name one thing!"

The procedure for running the convention. Who gets seated in the event of conflicting state claims to representation. The agenda. The amedments which will be offered. Who determines whether a proposed amendment got 3/4's of state support if the majority says it did? The Supreme Court? I don't know that I trust them. When the stakes are this high there would be plenty of "solid conservatives" who would be bought off.

53 posted on 02/07/2014 10:19:46 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10

Sorry, it is broken and needs fixing. if you can’t see that, then you haven’t been paying attention for the past 100 years.


54 posted on 02/07/2014 10:20:45 AM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th; Resolute Conservative; VerySadAmerican; Nuc 1.1; MamaTexan; ...
Article V ping!!
55 posted on 02/07/2014 10:21:18 AM PST by Jacquerie (To save our republic, re-federalize Washington.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

You are seriously off the rails.


56 posted on 02/07/2014 10:21:56 AM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: circlecity
It goes back to the states for ratification, the same as any other amendment.

You need to do some research.

/johnny

57 posted on 02/07/2014 10:23:29 AM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
"Some of what you are saying may or may not have any element of truth, but here’s the part that is certainly true: “If 3/4 of the states vote to pass any such amendment then it becomes part of the constitution.”

And what if the majority of the delegates to such a convention vote that all votes on passage of proposed amendments be done in secret with an "official vote counter" to announce the results? Nothing would prevent this at an Article V convention. And when all the amendments you despise get fraudulently passed how are you going to challenge that?

58 posted on 02/07/2014 10:25:12 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Liaison
The progressives want this more than any other method . . .

If that was the case, they would have proposed an amendment convention many times since 1913. They have the courts always at the ready to amend the constitution.

American 2014 is a police state. It is foolish to gaff off the peaceful means our framers gave us to possibly restore freedom.

59 posted on 02/07/2014 10:25:52 AM PST by Jacquerie (Article V is our only chance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: circlecity
The convention of states can only propose amendments. It doesn't pass them. The amendments go to the states, like any other amendment would do.

/johnny

60 posted on 02/07/2014 10:29:39 AM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson