Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will The Overselling Of Global Warming Lead To A New Scientific Dark Age?
Forbes ^ | 2-7-2014 | Patrick Michaels

Posted on 02/07/2014 5:23:08 AM PST by edcoil

Will the overselling of climate change lead to a new scientific dark age? That’s the question being posed in the latest issue of an Australian literary journal, Quadrant, by Garth Paltridge, one of the world’s most respected atmospheric scientists.

Paltridge was a Chief Research Scientist with the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO). The latter is Australia’s equivalent of the National Science Foundation, our massive Federal Laboratory network, and all the governmental agency science branches rolled into one.

(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: climitechange; globalwarming; globalwarminghoaax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 02/07/2014 5:23:08 AM PST by edcoil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: edcoil

An excellent question which really needed to be asked.


2 posted on 02/07/2014 5:24:37 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

Interesting question.

Our scientific establishment has become extremely political. Our education establishment is likewise.

America needs to somehow wrest back, leadership.


3 posted on 02/07/2014 5:26:00 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network ( http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html#2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

No, real science will continue to advance,

just politicized scientISM will be suppressed.


4 posted on 02/07/2014 5:28:49 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

If you want to understand the agenda, it’s all here in one declarative sentence:

“Science proves the bible wrong.”


5 posted on 02/07/2014 5:29:44 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil
“Will The Overselling Of Global Warming Lead To A New Scientific Dark Age?”

Totally irrelevant to the facts.

It is all about the liberal point of view. March in lock step with any liberal idea, and everything will be forgiven and forgot. Think not?

Do some research on ‘global cooling.’ Yes, the same fruitcake scientists that are now predicting global warning, 35 years ago predicted cars and greenhouse gasses would cause global cooling. Having a track record of ‘0’ means nothing if you will stay on the liberal line.

And when science is totally controlled by ideology, we are already in the “Scientific Dark Age.” The real question is “will we get out of the Scientific Dark Age before we f-up the world.

6 posted on 02/07/2014 5:33:00 AM PST by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

Bump!


7 posted on 02/07/2014 5:33:29 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion ("Liberalism” is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

no


8 posted on 02/07/2014 5:34:18 AM PST by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... History is a process, not an event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

It already has.


9 posted on 02/07/2014 5:37:06 AM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th (and 17th))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Where will we get new scientists, when 99% of the schools and universities in this country “teach” the type of “science” used by global warming fanatics to “prove” their case?


10 posted on 02/07/2014 5:39:55 AM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th (and 17th))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

We are already there.

Fake testing, “scientists” selling political views for ill gotten gain


11 posted on 02/07/2014 5:41:42 AM PST by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

Homeschooled children of conservative engineers... :)


12 posted on 02/07/2014 5:44:14 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

Science is stronger than ever - incredible developments in medicine, computer technology, applied chemistry and the like continue apace.

It’s the public perception of science that will take a hit. And that may be a good thing - because of the technical achievements of the last century, more and more people came to confuse scientific knowledge with general wisdom. And like actors who are great at their craft but have their heads wedged in a familiar orifice when it comes to other things, there are lots of scientists who can master esoteric fields, but are absolutely clueless when it comes to politics or culture.


13 posted on 02/07/2014 5:50:17 AM PST by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

Lead to? It’s a sign that we’re already there. AGW is just another pagan religion.


14 posted on 02/07/2014 5:51:00 AM PST by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

I hope so.


15 posted on 02/07/2014 5:53:40 AM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th (and 17th))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
“Our scientific establishment has become extremely political.”

This happened during the Clinton administration. They changed funding criteria for the explicit pursuit of political agendas (reported in Science magazine). The Bush administration never changed it back. When science changed from understanding physical reality to pursuing agendas, it was the beginning of the end. The public was bound to notice eventually.

16 posted on 02/07/2014 6:04:23 AM PST by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

Heck, we’ve got the EPA - that motley collection of general science major D students.

And glow-bull “warming” is just another layer of stinky, smelly, septic libstuff (with flies included at no extra cost).

Thank G*d for the second ammendment.


17 posted on 02/07/2014 6:06:35 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Unfortunately most of the research comes directly from universities and they have been taken over long ago by the alarmists.(leftists)


18 posted on 02/07/2014 6:23:56 AM PST by refermech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

We can all be glad the kooks didn’t freak out back when the world first started warming up from the last ice age. Everyone assumed warmer weather was a good thing. At least it felt better on frost bite.


19 posted on 02/07/2014 6:49:45 AM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

Does anyone here really believe the lib/left/socialist/dims would ever STOP coming up with Krazy Krap in an effort to advance their agenda?

The answer to both questions is No. Science will continue unabated.

But, will it be fair and honest science?


20 posted on 02/07/2014 7:00:24 AM PST by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson