Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Now They're Suing Churches
Family Policy Institute of Washington ^ | February 5, 2014 | Joseph Backholm

Posted on 02/05/2014 3:50:49 PM PST by fwdude

line in the sandRecently, Eastside Catholic High School caused an uproar when they dismissed their vice-principal who entered a same-sex “marriage” in violation of church teaching.

In a story that could have implications for this case, as well as for churches everywhere, last week the Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD) filed a complaint against a Catholic girl’s prep school which refused to hire a man who is “married” to another man.

Matthew Barrett applied for a job as the food service director at the Fontbonne Academy in Milton, Massachusetts and was offered the job. When his pre-employment form listed him as having a “husband” the school informed him that they could not hire him.

The news is not that the homosexual community is suing people for doing things they don’t like. That’s actually pretty old news.

The news here is that they’re suing churches, something they assured us would NEVER happen because they just respect religious freedom far too much.

To appreciate the significance of this latest development, a brief review of where we’ve come from is helpful.

Originally they just wanted homosexuality removed from the list of mental disorders. “You don’t have to like it or agree with it” they told us, “all we want is to no longer be told we’re crazy for having feelings we can’t control.”

Then they wanted to get rid of the ban on homosexuality in the military. “Don’t ask, don’t tell. C’mon be reasonable. All we want is the right to serve our country without being forced to lie about who we are.”

Then homosexuality was added to the list of protected classes in non-discrimination laws. “Of course we’re not trying to stop you from having your own beliefs or expressing them however you want, we just don’t want to lose our jobs because we’re gay. It’s not like we’re trying to get married.”

Then it was domestic partnerships with some of the rights and benefits of marriage. “All we want is the right to visit our loved ones in the hospital. How heartless can you be?”

Then domestic partnerships were expanded to have all the rights and benefits of marriage. “We don’t want to change marriage, all we want is the same rights and benefits of marriage. We’re tired of being treated like second class citizens.” And they told that story about wanting to visit people in the hospital again even though it was a non-issue.

Then they decided they needed to redefine marriage after all. “All we want is to change civil marriage. We wouldn’t dream of interfering with a churches right to define marriage however it wants and act accordingly. We love religious freedom. Hey, I go to church too.” And they told the story about wanting to visit loved ones in the hospital...again...because it still worked. Tehehe.

And now they’re suing churches.

Despite the complaint against the Catholic school for making decisions consistent with their church teaching, Bennet Klein, the GLAD lawyer representing Barrett is STILL trying to make the case that he supports religious freedom.

There’s a Baghdad Bob component to all of this that’s actually kind of funny.

In a statement on their website, Bennett Klein, the GLAD lawyer representing Barrett said, “Our laws carefully balance the important values of religious liberty and non-discrimination. When Fontbonne Academy fired Matt from a job that has nothing to do with religion, they came down on the wrong side of the law.”

You see, all of you who think your religious freedoms are being taken away are mistaken. They love religious freedom. In reality they’re just clarifying your confusion about what religion actually is.

In the future, if you have any questions about which parts of your church actually have to do with your religion you can check with your local GLAD lawyer. They’re happy to serve.

Lots of people have been observing the conflict between freedom and the sexual liberty movement from the sideline for decades. I get it. Conflict really isn’t that fun. And isn’t life more fun when everyone thinks you’re awesome?

We’ve come a long ways since homosexuality was removed from the list of mental disorders and you’ve been quiet all the while. They’re suing churches now. They moved out of the closet, slept on the couch for a while, eventually sent you to the guestroom when they took over the master bedroom, and now you’re standing with all your stuff in the front lawn while a guy is changing the locks on the doors.

At what point does ones desire to avoid conflict become cowardice? It’s a question worth asking because there are tens of millions of people in America handing over their freedoms without so much as a disapproving look. After all, there’s so much negativity already.

Maybe you resent the implication. Fair enough. Then answer this question. Where is your line in the sand?

Is it when they sue you? Is it when you can no longer get a business license because the state mandated non-discrimination policy to get a business license violates your beliefs? Is it when they sue your church? When they sue your friend’s church? When they close your church? When they put your pastor in jail? When they take your kids from you to prevent your brand of hate from being spread to the next generation?

Or perhaps there is nothing you won’t put up with so long as no one accuses you of being “divisive” or “political”.

Winston Churchill once quipped that an appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile hoping it will eat him last.

That’s certainly one option.

Or, those who haven’t been eaten yet could just decide to stop the crocodile. Up to you. If you make him stop he’ll certainly be upset with you and may even have some harsh words...in public.

Your motives will be misrepresented, they’ll say you hate gay people, and if you’re a pastor someone is sure to accuse you of co-opting the gospel for political purposes. But, it could allow us to preserve the liberty so many risked their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor for. Are you sure you’re ready for that?

Yeah, may not be worth it. Here, eat this guy.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: catholic; homosexualagenda; romancatholicism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: fwdude
The news here is that they’re suing churches, something they assured us would NEVER happen because they just respect religious freedom far too much.

I made the statement long ago (years ago ....) here on FR and I'll repeat it here:

"Gay rights" and the "right to marry" has ALWAYS been about destroying the church, period.

Once they had the "right to marry" there'd be a full court press to sue churches for not performing "same sex marriages" in the name of "fairness" and "equality."

They'll go so far as to corrupt the Church's teachings on marriage and to re-define the term "marriage" in the public discourse.

This lawsuit is step #1 into making that happen.

The "gay rights" movement has always been about destroying the church, period.

41 posted on 02/06/2014 6:21:12 AM PST by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Sodomy laws used to keep homosexuals in the closet. They were never enforced, certainly not in contemporary times, and the homosexuals were allowed to bugger one another in private, notwithstanding the fact that their diseases create a health care burden on the rest of society.

Putting sodomy laws back in place would take homosexuality out of public view but still allow the homosexuals to bugger one another in peace.


42 posted on 02/06/2014 6:22:26 AM PST by MikeyB806
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ransomed
The Church wasn’t punished for not accepting civil divorce and remarriage.

Try denying divorced, remarried people spouse coverage as a religious employer and try saying that again.

The Church isn't a registered religious organization, it's the people who hold to the doctrine.

43 posted on 02/06/2014 9:23:14 AM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

That’s a good point. But no one lost tax exempt status for not incorporating civil divorce and remarriage into their religion. No one will be shocked if that eventually happens with ‘gay marriage.’ Divorce and civil remarriage wasn’t looked at as a civil right, but like you say no one was refused services or benefits about it like on a scale they are going to do with ‘gay marriage,’ at least that I am aware of.

Freegards


44 posted on 02/06/2014 9:45:34 AM PST by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

It was, of course, inevitable. They’ll doubtless succeed in shutting down the Catholic Schools system along with the Hospital system...........


45 posted on 02/07/2014 7:45:55 AM PST by Rich21IE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rich21IE
They’ll doubtless succeed in shutting down the Catholic Schools system along with the Hospital system...........

And this Great Republic will be much the poorer for it. It's all part of the demonic plan.

46 posted on 02/07/2014 8:12:00 AM PST by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson