Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

In the new and improved DoD, liking women appears to get you in trouble, but guys liking guys is OK. Texting that some Representative is "smoking hot" (the comment - no sexual relations!) is a huge deal, and in fact gets a Brigadier General canned, but the homosexual gets applauded for their heroism in coming out. Is this a joke? If this were a general stating he was homosexual how would the news spin the story and how would the Army react?

We expect many to be near robots, perfect, never telling an off color joke, commenting on the looks of a woman, making a value judgement on some behavior or culture, or becoming intoxicated to the point of embarrassing themselves, getting a DWI etc. That behavior is inexcusable, but being an officer an dressed up in leather at a gay pride rally, or being a senior officer in the state department and leading the way in a gay pride rally in Europe and being photographed in a skin tight belly shirt with super extra short shorts and printed all over the media, that's all fine today.

1 posted on 02/04/2014 8:01:59 PM PST by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Red6

More of the “purge” going on in the military?


2 posted on 02/04/2014 8:03:39 PM PST by doc1019
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6

Isn’t Ellmers the one who may have to run against Clay Aiken?


3 posted on 02/04/2014 8:03:45 PM PST by Colonel_Flagg (Some people meet their heroes. I raised mine. Go Army.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6

This is absolutely disgusting!

I’ve seen the Congresswomen! They are gross to look at!


4 posted on 02/04/2014 8:05:17 PM PST by Tzimisce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6

Memorandum of Concern seems appropriate.

She’s not smoking ....


5 posted on 02/04/2014 8:05:32 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6

Real soldiers don’t masturbate. Or pay for it.


6 posted on 02/04/2014 8:05:40 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6

Eye of the beerholder, I guess.

http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=Rep.%20Renee%20Ellmers%20&FORM=BILH1


7 posted on 02/04/2014 8:05:42 PM PST by TurboZamboni (Marx smelled bad and lived with his parents .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6

8 posted on 02/04/2014 8:06:12 PM PST by RC one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6; Vendome

in Marine terms this is fecal matter layered between baked powdered wheat without the baked powdered wheat


11 posted on 02/04/2014 8:11:45 PM PST by bigheadfred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6

I don’t think too many guys advance to flag rank by being stupid. This smells like a hit job, like someone airing a comment using the account of this General.


12 posted on 02/04/2014 8:11:54 PM PST by Rembrandt (Part of the 51% who pay Federal taxes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6

Aside form having learned of the Generals masturbatory braggadocio, so what?


22 posted on 02/04/2014 8:23:27 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6

I agree about the double standards you’re pointing out. However, when you are in a position of authority / leadership, you should be very discerning about what you put into an email.


23 posted on 02/04/2014 8:23:36 PM PST by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6

maybe too much time in the sandbox


25 posted on 02/04/2014 8:26:11 PM PST by wxgesr (Not for this post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6

I agree this is ridiculous. Warriors make crude jokes. so what? This incident says less about this general and more about the chain of command and illustrates the nonsense they focus on


30 posted on 02/04/2014 8:27:46 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6

Never mind Gen. Schweizer’s stupid email. This is small potatoes compared to the general he was conversing with (Sinclair). He’s facing 35 years in the brig for a multitude of offenses including sodomy, pornography and conduct unbecoming an officer. His court martial starts next month I believe.


39 posted on 02/04/2014 8:35:07 PM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6

This is the kind of crap the politicization and fagitization of the military has led to, and yet some FReepers think this and the cheating scandals, Petraeus idiocy, etc are some kind of witch-hunt purging? C’mon, wise up people!


56 posted on 02/04/2014 8:55:16 PM PST by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6

Surprise surprise surprise, another dump of mysterious e-mails by the Washington dot-Compost, from a mysterious unnamed source that is not once mentioned. I wonder where oh where could all these emails regarding this general, Christie, Petraeus, etc etc be coming from?


70 posted on 02/04/2014 9:37:30 PM PST by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6

If you’re a colonel who wants to get stars and you’re dumb enough to put that in writing, you deserve to have it blow up on you after you get your stars.


78 posted on 02/04/2014 10:50:39 PM PST by RichInOC (Rich's Undeniable Truth of the Day: Stupidity is its own punishment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6

The NSA has been reading emails again, I see.


80 posted on 02/04/2014 11:19:58 PM PST by Flick Lives (Got a problem with the government? Have a complaint. Get a free IRS audit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6

Was hoping it wasn’t about Nancy Pelosi.


83 posted on 02/04/2014 11:52:51 PM PST by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6

That`s ridiculous! This guy isn`t in trouble for liking women but for showing a worrying degree of unprofessionality and sheer stupidity.

There`s nothing wrong with finding her attractive and lusting for her. There`s a whole lot wrong with a senior officer making those remarks on the job.

He is no nineteen year old private, for crying out loud. Obviously he isn`t even in command of his two brains, and yet he is to be trusted with the command over several thousand men?


84 posted on 02/05/2014 3:29:39 AM PST by MoraBlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson