Fortunately, women who hate men and children don’t have either. Now if they’d just shut up about it, we’d all be happy, but nooooooooo.....................
X-X chromozone beings that believe the above are not women
Conservative women are more attractive than liberal women, of course.
Feminism isn’t about women’s liberation unless it’s the freedom to become childless workaholics their entire lives and advancing liberal causes. Limbaugh is correct in his use of the term “feminazi”.
I think the best comparison that can be made with “movement feminists”, is that they are in the same position that the prohibition movement was in after the 18th Amendment was passed.
Passing the 18th Amendment was the “high water mark” of the “Nasty Nellies”. But constitutional amendments by themselves don’t actually *do* anything, until they have what are called “enabling acts”, that actually specify the real laws, who enforces them, and what punishments are entailed for violating them.
In the case of the 18th Amendment, its enabling act was the Volstead Act, and by the time it was passed, everybody but the prohibitionists realized it was a bad idea. So congress intentionally made Volstead very weak and mostly worthless. From that point it was a long and violent slide downhill, until finally, in disgust, the 21st Amendment repealed the 18th.
However, the prohibition movement still exists, after a fashion. In 1895 the Anti-Saloon League became a national organization, pushing aside its older competitors, the Woman’s Christian Temperance Union and the Prohibition Party. From 1948 until 1950 it was named the Temperance League, from 1950 to 1964 the National Temperance League, from 1964 the American Council on Alcohol Problems. Today the organization continues its original goal.
In the case of “movement feminists”, their biggest victory was with Roe v. Wade. However, conservatism, still remembering the disaster of Prohibition, defeated their efforts to foist another disastrous constitutional amendment on America, the Equal Rights Amendment.
Which was recognized early on as a “stinker from Stinkersville”; designed not to improve the lot of women, but to savage the American economy, redistribute wealth to the leftists, and otherwise oppress, denigrate and impoverish the citizenry.
In any event, this is why NOW should be thought of in the same league as the Anti-Saloon League. It is their philosophical descendant.
They had a lot of BS ideas even back at the start of their “movement” but at least they had a few ideas that were lucid.
They have gone from seeking equal pay for equal work to whining for free rubbers. The incredible shrinking mind-numbed robots...
And yet ... at least from what I read on FR ... these women manage to control every man in America, perhaps every man on earth. Judges, legislators, CEOs: they all do what these women want.
All I can think is that sex with them must be unbelievably incredibly spectacular.
I guess it’s not what you take when you leave this world behind you, it’s what you leave behind you when you go. - Randy Travis
There is nothing ‘feminine’ about ‘feminism’ .... it’s all “victimism”. It’s a dark, dark world with no love in it and these victimists have obviously never experienced a loving relationship with a man where each is concerned with the welfare of the other (not self) and both are blessed and gain immeasurably from it. Love makes a woman beautiful & not just in a physical way ...... which tells you a lot about what loveless state “victimists” are in when you see pictures of them and hear them spewing their ‘ugly’ views.
Only five? Must have had a word limit.
Wonder what they’d say about a guy like me, that doesn’t care about sex...
Feminazism is contrary to human nature.
I suspect most hard line feminazi types were rejected by guys back in the teen years.. they were the fat, homely ones who developed hatred for them when they missed out on all the fun stuff. So as their college years commenced, their hatred for all things male and all things traditional became calcified.
Only 5?
I just read up on Alice Walker, the write of “Color Purple”.
It also says this:
“She is a staunch defender not only of human rights, but of the rights of all living beings”.
I guess that doesn’t apply to her daughter having a living being.
She got married after college and had her daughter, Rebecca. I guess it was ok for her to have a baby but not her daughter.
She had a short romance with Tracy Chapman years after her divorce from her husband.
Even the AMAZONS of mythology had to have men to replenish their ranks of women.
That is inherently unfair and needs to be remedied through legislation or whatever means available immediately.