Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red in Blue PA

Uh. what’s wrong with 401K and other investment vehicles?

This Mussolini wannabe is delusional.


2 posted on 01/29/2014 3:13:21 AM PST by Westbrook ()Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Westbrook

“Uh. what’s wrong with 401K and other investment vehicles?”

I didn’t read the article as I’m too annoyed. However at a first blush you’d be buying government bonds. But you’d be paying today’s dollars. You can bet the bond’s interest rate will not keep pace with the Fed’s printing of money. So, you’d be at a net buying power loss when you withdrew it. This is a version of Clinton’s original plan to seize all 401k’s and replace them with IOU’s like they did with Social Security. The woman who designed that scheme is in an office down a few doors from the Oval office.


7 posted on 01/29/2014 3:19:36 AM PST by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Westbrook

“Obama to launch government-backed retirement savings program”

Government-backed retirement savings program????

I thought THAT was called Social Security!


17 posted on 01/29/2014 3:35:45 AM PST by catman67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Westbrook

“Uh. what’s wrong with 401K and other investment vehicles”

they rasist because the fo’ks don’t have them, only the “rich” have 401K and IRA (leftover money they can save) because their taxes too low, because there no opportunity for the hard workin’ middle class, income not distributed fair, need government program to do that

yada yada yada
read the democrat party manifesto


43 posted on 01/29/2014 5:02:03 AM PST by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Westbrook

What’s wrong with those others?
Why, YOU have control of them, that’s what’s wrong with them.

Seriously, that IS what they see as WRONG with them.

What to watch for now is that at first it will be voluntary,
then it will be required.


49 posted on 01/29/2014 5:16:47 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Westbrook
"what’s wrong with 401K and other investment vehicles?"

"If you like your 401K, you can keep your 401K"

55 posted on 01/29/2014 5:20:42 AM PST by norwaypinesavage (Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Westbrook

this will be the vehicle to federalize and “hair cut” private 401k / ira / 403b funds.


82 posted on 01/29/2014 6:44:42 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Westbrook
It's not about retirement it's about control of retirement funds. If healthcare represents 1/6 of the economy what percentage is the retirement finance community

If the government can control your savings for retirement they can dictate the terms when you can access the money. Don't kid yourselves, this is the first step in making a "fair" retirement pool for everybody which usually means it won't work out well for those who have planned individually.

91 posted on 01/29/2014 7:29:28 AM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Westbrook

Or even savings bonds. From the brief description, all Obama is suggesting is a minor variation of existing government investment vehicles.


97 posted on 01/29/2014 8:34:19 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson