From your mouth, to Allah's ear, as the saying goes...
There. Fixed it.
Fearless prediction: As her poll numbers crater, Davis will soon hold a press conference to denounce all those who oppose her. Her argument, in a nutshell, will be “ I could have had TWO abortions. But I didn’t. See there, I’m actually pro-life. So shut up.”
For later
We all profile. Every single one of us. We do it after we learn our first lesson in life.
Who in this world does not know that a Woman’s most sacrid thing in this world are their children?
So yeah, when a round healed, gold digger walks away from her own flesh and blood EVERYONE knows she is a Head Case.
All her actions afterwords only reinforces it.
I wouldn’t bet the farm on it. Maybe not in Texas, but she could move to Massachusetts, lie about her past, and win elections, just like Warren did.
“Americans will forgive a lot in a politician. But a woman who leaves her kids is just beyond the pale.”
But apparently there are many Americans that approve of her ABORTING her babies and would consider her doing that a heroic act.
Bull. This might hurt her in flyover country, but in Commie America, it would be considered resume enhancement.
This is an interesting idea. I never thought about it from that angle.
I wonder why no one is asking about her claim that an editorial caused her to have psychological problems. What were the problems? Does she still have them? How fragile is her mental health?
>> But a woman who leaves her kids is just beyond the pale.
Leaves or kills.
The media roasted Sarah Palin for being a “quitter”
Where are they now when Davis quit on her own children?
If I understand it correctly, the older girl was not even the biological daughter of wallet #2. So unless Wendy “Baby Killer” Davis told the judge “I don’t want the kid”, she would have gotten custody.
And sorry ladies, but the way the courts work, the woman gets primary custody by default. A man is lucky to get weekly visitation, if the mother doesn’t want him to.
I agree that Wendy Davis is finished and precisely because she gave up her children. However I also believed a while back that Bill Clinton couldn’t possibly survive in office after being exposed as a pervert and perjurer.
I just read on that other site that she was a Republican. Was she?
I’ll believe she has no future when SNL does a skit about her. Her background is fertile ground for mockery.
SNL will never do it.
Her fundraising would skyrocket, the liberal media would circle the wagons even tighter, and her new "sexual identity struggle" would explain away all her past lies and failings.
Windy: "What difference do these children make?"
Not to mention the restraining order the custodial hubby had to get in 2003. (In that order, the judge ordered that Wendy Davis “be immediately restrained from . . . using illegal drugs or consuming alcohol within 24 hours before or during the period of possession of or access to the child.”)
Buh bye, Windy...we barely knew ye.
It’s one thing to not have custody of the child you had with your spouse after a divorce, its a whole and completely different story when the child you had to another man before you even met the man you divorced was in the pictured winds up in his custody as well.
She has no future in any sort of politics beyond trivial local arena nonsense.
It is true, a woman not having custody of her child, in at least a shared or joint sense generally means she’s a train wreck or was at least, prior and during the divorce. Divorce law in the united states is so insanely weighted toward maternal custody that joint/shared custody is best a father can even hope for in most cases. She either has to willingly give up custody to him or basically be proven to be such a bad mother than the state would have taken them off her anyway for the father to wind up with sole and complete custody.
Yes, I know there are edge cases out there, but they are incredibly incredibly rare, the courts bend over backwards to give the mother every benefit of the doubt in custody matters during divorce.
I am hard pressed to think of a case where a father is the custodial parent of a child born before he was ever in the picture prior to a divorce. I know there are cases like this, but for a judge to grant sole custody to a person over their biological parent is just insanely rare.
so, America will readily forgive a woman who aborts her pre-borns (and advocates others doing that same) but won’t forgive a woman who gives up custody of those who were born. Unfortunately, all too true.