Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Driver Ticketed for Google Glass Found Not Guilty
NBC Bay Area ^ | Thursday, Jan 16, 2014 | Omari Fleming and R. Stickney

Posted on 01/16/2014 4:29:35 PM PST by nickcarraway

The device is worn like glasses and allows the user to record video hands-free By

A San Diego traffic court commissioner dismissed the first traffic ticket issued to a person for using "Google Glass" while driving but the ruling should not be considered an invitation to users to wear the device behind the wheel.

Cecilia Abadie, of Temecula, Calif., was ticketed for speeding while driving Interstate 15 near Aero Drive on Oct. 29.

The California Highway Patrol officer who issued the ticket testified Wednesday that Abadie passed him doing 85 mph in her silver Toyota Prius.

“When I contacted her she was wearing a device on her face known as Google Glass,” CHP Officer Keith Odle testified. “It was covering half of her right eye.“

Officer Odle and a representative from the CHP Academy in Sacramento testified on what they considered the safety concerns of the device but San Diego Commissioner John Blair ruled they did not present enough evidence that Abadie was actually using the device when she was stopped.

Abadie maintains she was simply wearing the device, which she does all the time apparently, and that the Glass activated when she looked up at the officer as he approached her vehicle.

Blair found Abadie but added that he felt the new device does fall under California Vehicle Code 27602.

That particular section, according to CHP, states that it’s against the law in California for a motorist to drive a car if a television monitor, screen or similar video monitors are turned on and visible to the driver.

“Based on the plain language of the statute, the court finds that … Google Glass falls within the purview and intent of the legislature,” Commission Blair ruled.

In December, Abadie pleaded not guilty to the citation and shared how her legal team planned to defend her against the unique traffic ticket via – what else – Google Glass.

“There’s nothing illegal about wearing Google Glass while driving your vehicle,” said Abadie’s attorney, Will Concidine, adding that the device was invented after the current law was passed banning drivers from watching TV screens or monitors.

Abadie posted a photo of the citation on her Google+ page, adding:

“A cop just stopped me and gave me a ticket for wearing Google Glass while driving! The exact line says: Driving with Monitor visible to Driver (Google Glass). Is #GoogleGlass illegal while driving or is this cop wrong? Any legal advice is appreciated!! This happened in California. Do you know any other #GlassExplorers that got a similar ticket anywhere in the U.S.?”

Legislators and others were watching for the San Diego judge's decision — a fact not lost on Abadie. She never imagined being a part of so much media attention.

Though Abadie said she understands the safety concern, she said she typically wears her Google Glass all day – even while driving – but doesn’t turn them on behind the wheel.

Google Glass is worn on the head, just like a pair of eyeglasses, and allows the user to take images and share content hands-free.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: distracteddriving
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 01/16/2014 4:29:35 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Soon enough, we’ll have Google contacts, and the police won’t even know you are wearing them. Plus, we’ll have Google cars that drive for us, so we won’t need to worry about being distracted by the Google contacts.


2 posted on 01/16/2014 4:40:01 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I don’t see how they can disallow monitors generally, while still allowing GPS screens. It’s a video image and you could look at one so intently that you’re not paying attention to your driving. Do people get tickets for those too?


3 posted on 01/16/2014 4:41:26 PM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

To entertain you on your ride to the camps. “Arbeit Macht Frei!”


4 posted on 01/16/2014 4:42:22 PM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

They might be Google camps. You can watch videos and make social media posts while you are being starved and worked to death.


5 posted on 01/16/2014 4:45:24 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
doing 85 mph in her silver Toyota Prius.

Must have been down hill.

6 posted on 01/16/2014 4:49:00 PM PST by justrepublican (Screaming a "Vexatious requester" at a Wellstone memorial...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

No different than a heads-up display.


7 posted on 01/16/2014 4:53:55 PM PST by Ramius (Personally, I give us one chance in three. More tea anyone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman



8 posted on 01/16/2014 5:16:33 PM PST by MeshugeMikey (This Message NOT Approved By The N.S.A.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: justrepublican
..Prius...Must have been down hill.

With a class 3 hurricane tail wind... ;-)

9 posted on 01/16/2014 5:21:42 PM PST by NoCmpromiz (John 14:6 is a non-pluralistic comment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Fast forward two years, where a Google exec is going.....

"Pay to the order of Iron Balls McGinty....One dollar and nine cents."

10 posted on 01/16/2014 5:24:26 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
it’s against the law in California for a motorist to drive a car if a television monitor, screen or similar video monitors are turned on and visible to the driver.

Get rid of your Garmin!

11 posted on 01/16/2014 5:29:00 PM PST by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justrepublican
"Must have been down hill. "

Ever drive one? 0-60 around 10 seconds. Top speed 108 mph.

Not too shabby.

12 posted on 01/16/2014 5:53:50 PM PST by MV=PY (The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: justrepublican

It is easy to do 85 in a Prius. I’ve passed big pickup trucks going uphill at 80 mph in my Prius.

Now, 105? Can’t be done — a Prius has a fixed maximum speed built into the electric motor.


13 posted on 01/16/2014 5:58:15 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MV=PY

I think the 108mph is speed limited for the S-rated tires.
Those cars are all about low aero drag.
I’ve read they will approach 130mph with a software mod (and speed rated rubber).


14 posted on 01/16/2014 5:59:19 PM PST by nascarnation (I'm hiring Jack Palladino to investigate Baraq's golf scores.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

Yes, if the heads-up display was displaying something entirely different from the road.

I think it is perfectly reasonable to not let people where operational google glasses while driving.


15 posted on 01/16/2014 5:59:22 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Sounds about par for the course these days. And I bet a lot of people would go for it almost willingly.


16 posted on 01/16/2014 6:00:13 PM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

See #14


17 posted on 01/16/2014 6:00:21 PM PST by nascarnation (I'm hiring Jack Palladino to investigate Baraq's golf scores.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

“Google Plus Macht Frei”? If you post to Facebook, you lose 100 calories out of your “dinner”.


18 posted on 01/16/2014 6:02:06 PM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MV=PY

I did not realize the 2013 Prius had a higher top speed, which is actually 112 MPH. The 2004 Prius had a top speed of 102.


19 posted on 01/16/2014 6:03:18 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

in the 2004 prius, the speed limit was based on the bearing load on the main traction electric motor, which is direct-connected to the wheels.


20 posted on 01/16/2014 6:05:21 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson