CNN is already using it to accuse gun owners of being dangerous nuts.
The situation is actually more about a government agent who once had power over his fellow citizen
being a dangerous nut.
The real angle is “ex-cop bully with authority issues.”
By their logic, the incident could just as reasonably be used to accuse cops of being dangerous nuts.
I don't get how they think they could possibly win with this. This guy isn't random Joe Blow, he's a retired cop. You know, the only class of people who can handle carrying guns at any/all times? The ones who we're supposed to call to protect us since guns are so dangerous to mere mortals?
Isn't holding this guy up as a reason to despite gun ownership merely destroying their own argument?