Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Seahawks Ban Californians from Buying Tickets to NFL Title Game
Breitbart ^ | January 13, 2014 | Breitbart Sports

Posted on 01/13/2014 7:19:01 PM PST by This Just In

In what is emerging as the NFL most heated and best rivalry, the Seattle Seahawks will play host to the San Francisco 49ers on Sunday for a trip to the Super Bowl.

But fans from California won't be able to purchase tickets for the game at CenturyLink Field in Seattle, which is the loudest NFL stadium and arguably its most hostile.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: California; US: Washington
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: kingu

Your comments are in valid on this thread. You have a California zip code. /jk


21 posted on 01/13/2014 8:07:04 PM PST by This Just In
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: This Just In

Every team does this. Hardly a scandal.


22 posted on 01/13/2014 8:09:44 PM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JouleZ

chickenhawks


23 posted on 01/13/2014 8:12:09 PM PST by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo in laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan

Your comment is disqualified due to your SeaHawks fan status. :^)


24 posted on 01/13/2014 8:13:11 PM PST by This Just In
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: fabian

Perhaps Seaweed?


25 posted on 01/13/2014 8:15:51 PM PST by This Just In
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative

Restraint of trade


26 posted on 01/13/2014 8:25:47 PM PST by twister881
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: montag813

I’d be curious to hear from a lawyer on this one, but I always understood “restraint of trade” to be a claim that would be brought by the business, not a potential customer.


27 posted on 01/13/2014 8:33:39 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("I've never seen such a conclave of minstrels in my life.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: This Just In

seachickens


28 posted on 01/13/2014 8:44:36 PM PST by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo in laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: This Just In

Seattle San Francisco tickets for sale...get ‘em while I got ‘em. California residents only.


29 posted on 01/13/2014 8:46:44 PM PST by gunsequalfreedom (Conservative is not a label of convenience. It is a guide to your actions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: This Just In

seaweed eating Seachickens hehe...


30 posted on 01/13/2014 8:47:16 PM PST by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo in laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative
This IS a free market activity - a private business (the Seahawks) are choosing who they would, and would not, like to do business with.

This would be true only if the Seattle Seahawks owned the Stadium. I believe the Stadium was built with tax money by the State of Washington and is owned and operated by the State. In that sense the Seattle Seahawks are a quasi-public entity. The Seahawks are just another example of crony capitalism at work. A marriage between the state and corporations.

Very few Major League sports teams own their own stadiums. I believe the LA Dodgers may be the only one left.

31 posted on 01/13/2014 8:49:51 PM PST by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: This Just In
I wholeheartedly agree. Their stadium, their rules.

The Stadium belongs to the State of Washington.

32 posted on 01/13/2014 9:04:22 PM PST by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: twister881

A private company choosing which customers they want to serve is not a “restraint of trade.”


33 posted on 01/13/2014 9:09:38 PM PST by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: This Just In

This is so gonna backfire on Seattle. This story is getting a lot of air time down here, as if the Niners weren’t fired up enough already. Now you got all the rich silicon valley folks ready to pay $1,000 for a ticket. Plenty of Seachoke fans will gladly sell their tickets for that much dope money. Besides, the ticket sales in Montana, Idaho, Nevada and even Oregon will be 90% Niner fans.


34 posted on 01/13/2014 9:12:25 PM PST by kik5150
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative
A private company choosing which customers they want to serve is not a “restraint of trade.”

The tickets are for a game in a stadium owned and managed by the State of Washington. Hence the Seahawks are a quasi-public entity and bound by the same access rules that a government agency would be bound by.

I would agree with you if the Seahawks owned the Stadium, but they don't. It was bought and paid for with tax money.

35 posted on 01/13/2014 9:14:30 PM PST by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

Excellent point. They should call it The Peoples CenturyLink Field Stadium. An even better reason to stay home and watch the game off of the big screen.


36 posted on 01/13/2014 9:18:39 PM PST by This Just In
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

That has absolutely no basis in the law. Yes, the stadium is publicly owned, but it is leased by the Seahawks for their games. As far as I know, the State of Washington has no role in ticket sales or policies, and does not benefit from such sales. The fact that it is a publicly-owned stadium does not mean that the team cannot decide who can/cannot buy tickets to the game.


37 posted on 01/13/2014 9:21:53 PM PST by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative
The fact that it is a publicly-owned stadium does not mean that the team cannot decide who can/cannot buy tickets to the game.

Actually it does. The State cannot lease their property to companies that violate public policy. I am sure that the contract contains equal access provisions and other clauses that would prohibit them from engaging in discriminatory ticket sale practices.

In this case by deliberately denying access to Californians to a public arena owned by the State of Washington, there is a violation of the privileges and immunities clause as enunciated in Sáenz v. Roe, 526 U.S. 489 (1999), specifically "the right to be treated as a welcome visitor rather than a hostile stranger".

38 posted on 01/13/2014 9:34:37 PM PST by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

Saenz v. Roe is inapplicable. That case involved denying out-of-state people certain public benefits (if I recall correctly, it had something to do with welfare benefits for people who recently moved to the state). Here, the ‘benefit’ is, again, a product sold by a private company. The fact that the team leases a public stadium does not make the team a quasi-public entity.


39 posted on 01/13/2014 9:42:51 PM PST by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative

You’re confusing freedom of association with free markets.


40 posted on 01/13/2014 10:17:00 PM PST by twister881
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson