Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe

That has absolutely no basis in the law. Yes, the stadium is publicly owned, but it is leased by the Seahawks for their games. As far as I know, the State of Washington has no role in ticket sales or policies, and does not benefit from such sales. The fact that it is a publicly-owned stadium does not mean that the team cannot decide who can/cannot buy tickets to the game.


37 posted on 01/13/2014 9:21:53 PM PST by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Conscience of a Conservative
The fact that it is a publicly-owned stadium does not mean that the team cannot decide who can/cannot buy tickets to the game.

Actually it does. The State cannot lease their property to companies that violate public policy. I am sure that the contract contains equal access provisions and other clauses that would prohibit them from engaging in discriminatory ticket sale practices.

In this case by deliberately denying access to Californians to a public arena owned by the State of Washington, there is a violation of the privileges and immunities clause as enunciated in Sáenz v. Roe, 526 U.S. 489 (1999), specifically "the right to be treated as a welcome visitor rather than a hostile stranger".

38 posted on 01/13/2014 9:34:37 PM PST by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson