Posted on 01/12/2014 12:37:25 PM PST by Para-Ord.45
On Monday, without comment (because he could not make a coherent one), Chief Justice John Roberts denied a request by the Association of American Physicians & Surgeons and the Alliance for Natural Health USA for a stay in the implementation of Obamacare. The groups had made their application last Friday, arguing that since the bill had been declared a tax by the Supreme Court (with Justice Roberts himself the deciding vote), and it had originated in the Senate (the Constitution says revenue bills may not originate), the law was therefore unconstitutional; and implementation of Obamacare should at least be stayed pending further examination.
While there are other minor issues attached to the application that were also not addressed, the truth of the matter is clear: John Roberts will never do anything to derail Obamacare, no matter what arguments against it are brought before him.
There is very good reason to believe that regardless of the media’s skillful smothering of the story, John Roberts is being blackmailed to make certain Obamacare never falls in a Supreme Court case. The basis of this charge surrounds the fact that a series of strange (and probably felonious) acts are attached to the adoption of his two children.
(Excerpt) Read more at westernjournalism.com ...
“Our” side is just as corrupt at “their” side. Actually, that should be “your” side. Neither one of them is on my side.
And do you actually believe a republican president would nominate ANYONE without knowing EVERYTHING about the person? YOU give ME a break.
Thanks semi-Newbie for your “insight”.
Are you reading what you are writing?
They were not legally “children” when they left Ireland, thus Ireland has no say.
I feel certain this same scenario is played out numerous times.
I think Irish have a different view about that. Don’t get mad a me because a Supreme Court Justice engaged in at the very least shady adoption proceedings. He made sure to have the adoptions sealed so no info can be viewed. Lets see who else seals all their info?
Back in the 60’s everyone said that women in politics was going to make governance more human.
I guess its like trying to look at Obama’s record as President as being an abject failure.
If you are trying to transform the United States into a socialist, post-superpower welfare state, then he’s one of the most successful Presidents since Lincoln.
Not even Reagan was able to bring change to this country as Obama has.
Don’t really know much about adoptions in general, but I understand that it is standard procedure for adoption records to be sealed, for anyone, not just a Justice.
Might as well quit worrying about any of the SCOTUS, the Founding Fathers set it up so they no longer have to answer to anyone other than their conscience, for life.
BHO has a history of getting sealed court records of political opponents unsealed.
No, problem. The next time I want information from an old person I’ll ping you.
I lost faith in the SCOTUS several years ago when they voted that its OK to take private property from one person and give it to another private person or entity. They are also corrupted at this point.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.