Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Dec. nonfarm payrolls total 74,000 vs. 200,000 est.; unemployment rate at 6.7% vs. 7% est.
CNBC ^ | January 10, 2014 | Jeff Cox

Posted on 01/10/2014 5:42:52 AM PST by John W

Job creation stumbled in December, with the U.S. economy adding just 74,000 positions even as the Federal Reserve voted to take the first steps in eliminating its stimulus program.

The unemployment rate dropped to 6.7 percent, below economist estimates and due primarily to continued shrinkage in the labor force. The labor force participation rate tumbled to 62.8 percent, its worst level since January 1978.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnbc.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: employment; jimmycartertime; jobs; obamarecession; recession; unemployment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last
To: John W

What a bunch of cr*p statistics.

Obviously unemployment isn’t getting better.

We need JOBS.

Not fiddling with statistics. Bring back US jobs.


21 posted on 01/10/2014 5:55:29 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html#2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

Yep. Exactly.

From Business Insider:

The Jobs Report just came out and it was very bad.

The 74K new jobs was much worse than the 200K that was expected.

But at the same time, there was a HUGE drop in the unemployment rate, from 7.0% to 6.7%.

There was also a big drop in the Labor Force Participation Rate, which helps the unemployment rate to fall.

So now Janet Yellen has a slightly tricky position. This number does not suggest an economy that’s hitting “escape velocity.” But on the other hand, we’re getting closer to unemployment levels where the Fed might be inclined to tighten. But on the third hand, we don’t know how “clean” that unemployment number is because fo the ongoing decline in Labor Force Participation Rate.

So things just got a bit trickier for Janet Yellen, who now doesn’t have a smooth path out of the current plan.

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/things-just-got-trickier-for-janet-yellen-2014-1#ixzz2q0IYD6bC


22 posted on 01/10/2014 5:55:54 AM PST by Wyatt's Torch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA
And December is typically a strong month for job creation with seasonal hires. This is simply pathetic.

No all of these numbers are seasonally adjusted and account for those sorts of things. Seasonal adjustments are used to make all data point comparable.

23 posted on 01/10/2014 5:56:57 AM PST by Wyatt's Torch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: John W

We’ve got the most corrupt government on the planet right now.


24 posted on 01/10/2014 5:57:17 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (If you like your ObamaCare, you can keep your ObamaCare. I'll pass. PERIOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W
and unicorns are farting rainbow skittles this morning.....


25 posted on 01/10/2014 5:57:56 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (The Second Amendment is NOT about the right to hunt. It IS a right to shoot tyrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952

Somebody is doing something right.


26 posted on 01/10/2014 5:58:41 AM PST by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: John W

And the weekly chocolate ration has been increased from 30 to 20 grams!

Obama be praised!


27 posted on 01/10/2014 5:59:24 AM PST by Fresh Wind (The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W

“The unemployment rate dropped to 6.7 percent, below economist estimates and due primarily to continued shrinkage in the labor force. The labor force participation rate tumbled to 62.8 percent, its worst level since January 1978”

The attempted Forced Federal Concentration Camp U.S. Territory is going to meet total resistance by the free people.


28 posted on 01/10/2014 6:00:18 AM PST by Varsity Flight (Extortion-Care is the Government Work-Camp: Arbeitsziehungslager)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W

It’s all my fault. I just changed my TSP allocations.


29 posted on 01/10/2014 6:02:37 AM PST by PLMerite (Shut the Beyotch Down! Burn, baby, burn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W

Oh, no! Look at all those unemployed moochers that so many at FR hate! And they all voted for Obama! They deseve what they get!


30 posted on 01/10/2014 6:03:49 AM PST by miss marmelstein (Richard Lives Yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

The unemployment rate is a ratio. The denominator is the number of persons in the labor pool. The denominator is slipping faster than the numerator which is the number of new unemployed.

The labor pool is shrinking because people have given up or are underemployed and are working multiple jobs. Persons who take a second or third job are not reducing the number of unemployed.

When the underemployed and frustrated are factored in, the unemployment rate is well over 16%.

Personally I know people that are still waiting to bounce back from 2009. In the next 5 to 6 years I don’t think they will ever have the opportunity.

I have heard from several young people that they have taken second and third jobs. Although they are naturally upbeat at their young age they are increasingly frustrated. They’re also bright enough to know that dramatic increases in the minimum wage will result in losing a job or two.

Under Obama the USA is in decline largely because of his policies.


31 posted on 01/10/2014 6:07:07 AM PST by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom
If they gave the rate for people of working age who aren't working the numbers would be a lot different.

I heard that kind of number last week -- it was be in the very high 11% range. Just this report probably raises that to the low 12% range now, which would in fact be in the 13%'s if we didn't count the military as "persons employed" as we did before they made one of their "adjustments" in the the 1982 recession.

32 posted on 01/10/2014 6:10:12 AM PST by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Wyatt's Torch

Notice in the chart it was even lower pre-1979. That’s because there were a lot more single income families back then.


33 posted on 01/10/2014 6:11:37 AM PST by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

Good luck with getting the MSM to use U6 instead of U3. Here on FR, the always-wrong kindergarten economists were ridiculing such a notion and fighting it hammer and tong at least as far back before the housing bubble blew up.


34 posted on 01/10/2014 6:14:09 AM PST by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

This is a political lie to improve prospects in the 2014 midterms.


But eventually they have the problem that Obama is having right now: When enough people are experiencing the opposite of what you are preaching, the public’s loss of trust in your words reaches critical mass. You become a laughing stock to more than just your political enemies.

This is only going to get worse for those who depend on the public believing those numbers.


35 posted on 01/10/2014 6:14:31 AM PST by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

Back then, you didn’t have to work three jobs to support your government leech.


36 posted on 01/10/2014 6:16:17 AM PST by NY.SS-Bar9 (Those that vote for a living outnumber those that work for one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Wyatt's Torch

“But on the other hand, we’re getting closer to unemployment levels where the Fed might be inclined to tighten”

And due to Federal attempted takeover (higher prices-—watch prices rise even further), the smaller number of EMployed will be paying higher and higher to federal program scams, including the Extortion-Care attempt.


37 posted on 01/10/2014 6:17:22 AM PST by Varsity Flight (Extortion-Care is the Government Work-Camp: Arbeitsziehungslager)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

Indeed. It’s important to note that they were single income families because they didn’t need to be two income families. Now in many cases single-income families used to be two income families and they’re in trouble. Any participation number today in fact signifies far more economic distress than a comparable number back then.


38 posted on 01/10/2014 6:18:10 AM PST by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: John W

At this rate, we’ll be at “full employment” by June!


39 posted on 01/10/2014 6:19:43 AM PST by Cowboy Bob (They are called "Liberals" because the word "parasite" was already taken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W

Funny math, indeed. At this rate the endgame is a reported unemployment rate of near zero, with those employed working for the government. /S


40 posted on 01/10/2014 6:20:40 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson