Skip to comments.
Box of Stashed Ballots Could Invalidate Contested Broomfield Election [vote fraud Colorado ]
Colorado Observer. ^
| January 8, 2014
| Leslie Jorgensen
Posted on 01/08/2014 10:46:14 AM PST by george76
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
1
posted on
01/08/2014 10:46:14 AM PST
by
george76
To: george76
Did the Dem win? If so, these fraudulent ballots must not have been needed.
To: george76
Validity of the ballots depends on party affiliation of the candidate that lost.
3
posted on
01/08/2014 10:51:13 AM PST
by
bigbob
(The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
To: george76
The vote concerned fracking.
4
posted on
01/08/2014 10:54:19 AM PST
by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: george76
The controversy surronds an anti-fracking amendment that failed in the initial count - then magically passed in the recount.
In unofficial election night results, the anti-fracking measure was failing by 13 votes, but after outstanding ballots were counted a week later, it was approved by 17 votes. The measure, which was subject to a mandatory recount because the margin of victory was so slim, passed by 20 votes after the recount was completed.
http://www.broomfieldenterprise.com/broomfield-news/ci_24857877/access-documents-latest-battle-involving-broomfield-election
5
posted on
01/08/2014 10:54:50 AM PST
by
Fido969
(What's sad is most)
To: george76
the 75 or more ballots cast by voters which were not processed, counted and reconciled far exceeds the narrow 20-vote margin victory of the controversial fracking ban measure.
6
posted on
01/08/2014 10:55:11 AM PST
by
rawhide
To: MileHi; dhs12345; dynachrome; beaversmom; Balata; bboop; BulletBobCo; Carley; ColoCowgirl; ...
Colorado Ping ( Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from the list.)
7
posted on
01/08/2014 10:56:24 AM PST
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: onyx
Boxes of ballots are a ‘quirk’.
Yeah.
To: george76
These are the same people who insist “we won, you lost, now shut up”.
I really have serious contempt for people who dither with election results, not that I am naive to think it doesn’t happen all the time. It’s obviously another brick on the side of the scales against amnesty, as far as I’m concerned. I think the penalties should be severe.
9
posted on
01/08/2014 10:57:35 AM PST
by
Attention Surplus Disorder
(At no time was the Obama administration aware of what the Obama administration was doing)
To: Attention Surplus Disorder
10
posted on
01/08/2014 11:00:03 AM PST
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: Black Agnes
11
posted on
01/08/2014 11:00:59 AM PST
by
onyx
(Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
To: george76
>> Unknown is where the ballots came from, why they were tossed in a box, who had access to them and why they were not properly processed
Why? In case they’re needed. “What ever it takes”
12
posted on
01/08/2014 11:02:36 AM PST
by
Ray76
To: george76
Reminds me of the episode of “Carter Country” where they found a box of uncounted ballots in the city hall basement.
They immediately thought it was some kind of voter fraud and would turn the results of the last election for mayor.
They assembled the candidates and officials to open the box and count the ballots to determine the results.
They opened the box and read aloud the first name of the candidate that received a vote:
GOLDWATER..................ONE.................
13
posted on
01/08/2014 11:06:27 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(Proud member of the Zeta Omicron Tau Fraternity since 2004...................)
To: george76
In San Francisco they just dump the whole box in the bay
14
posted on
01/08/2014 11:08:07 AM PST
by
Nifster
To: Attention Surplus Disorder
“I think the penalties should be severe.”
Progressives are not guilty of any crime when they further the revolution, no matter what crime they might commit to do so.
IMHO
15
posted on
01/08/2014 11:08:49 AM PST
by
ripley
To: george76
Records also indicate that Susek or a city employee repeatedly logged into the ballot accounting database as the administrator and downloaded vote tallies repeatedly for two weeks before the Nov. 5 election. Ok...so the question I'd like answered is, what party affiliation does Election Manager Michael Susek claim? Do I even need to ask?
16
posted on
01/08/2014 11:08:56 AM PST
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
("Gun horror is not a productive emotion, it's learned helplessness disguised as moral superiority.")
To: Red Badger
We need the make and model and name and version of the database the clerk was querying. Now.
17
posted on
01/08/2014 11:13:20 AM PST
by
txhurl
To: george76
Nothing online about Susek's party affiliation but...here is his photo.
He looks like pajama boy's life partner.
18
posted on
01/08/2014 11:13:51 AM PST
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
("Gun horror is not a productive emotion, it's learned helplessness disguised as moral superiority.")
To: Black Agnes
Al Franken’s car with the large back trunk again?
19
posted on
01/08/2014 11:21:02 AM PST
by
TurboZamboni
(Marx smelled bad and lived with his parents .)
To: rawhide
this is 2014......and we couldn’t get these election officials to have fair elections if their children’s lives depended on it....crooks.....
20
posted on
01/08/2014 11:26:36 AM PST
by
cherry
(.in the time of universal deceit, telling the truth is revolutionary.....)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson