Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kerry: No troops to rescue Fallujah and Ramadi from Al-Qaeda
Hotair ^ | 01/06/2014 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 01/06/2014 8:22:20 AM PST by SeekAndFind

The US fought for years to free Anbar province from the grip of al-Qaeda during the Iraq War. Fallujah and Ramadi turned into pitched battlefronts, and later “the surge” convinced local Sunni tribes to join the US effort to dispel AQ from the region. More than two years after the US pulled all of its forces out of Iraq, AQ is back — and Ramadi and Fallujah appear to have fallen once again:

CLICK ABOVE LINK FOR THE VIDEO

The city center of Iraq’s Fallujah has fallen completely into the hands of fighters from the al-Qaida-linked Islamic State in Iraq and Levant, police said Saturday, Jan. 4, yet another victory for the hardline group that has made waves across the region in recent days.

ISIL is also one of the strongest rebel units in Syria, where it has imposed a strict version of Islamic law in territories it holds and kidnapped and killed anyone it deems critical of its rule. Also on Saturday, it claimed responsibility for a suicide car bombing in a Shiite-dominated neighborhood in Lebanon.

Hadi Razeij, head of the Anbar province police force, said police had left the city center entirely and had positioned themselves on the edge of town.

“The walls of the city are in the hands of the police force, but the people of Fallujah are the prisoners of ISIL,” he said, speaking on Arabic language satellite broadcaster al-Arabiya.

The US, which is still at war with al-Qaeda under the terms of the October 2001 Authorization to Use Military Force (AUMF), and who has allied with the government in Baghdad, wants to help “in any way possible,” Secretary of State John Kerry announced this weekend. That is, any way that doesn’t involve fighting al-Qaeda in Iraq:

Secretary of State John F. Kerry said Sunday that the United States is ready to help Iraq in any way possible as that country began a major offensive to wrest control of two cities from al-Qaeda-linked militants. But he made it clear that no American troops would be sent in.

Kerry described the militants from the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, or ISIS, as “the most dangerous players” in the region. But as Iraqi forces launched airstrikes and clashed with the militants in western Anbar province on Sunday, Kerry said it was Iraq’s battle to fight. …

“This is a fight that belongs to the Iraqis,” Kerry said toward the end of a visit to Jerusalem. “We are not, obviously, contemplating returning. We are not contemplating putting boots on the ground. This is their fight, but we’re going to help them in their fight.”

Kerry didn’t give details of what assistance the United States might provide but said it would do “everything that is possible.” After Maliki appealed in November for more U.S. support in fighting extremists, Washington sent 75 Hellfire missiles and promised to dispatch drones.

It’s worth pointing out that the same group has upended Barack Obama’s Syrian policy, too. Both could have been avoided had the US worked out an extension of the security agreement that kept American troops on the ground in Iraq to deal with al-Qaeda. Then-Secretary of Defense Robert Gates fully expected that to happen, and so did Leon Panetta. Even Nouri al-Maliki expected the Americans to stay, or return almost immediately after the withdrawal two years ago.

Instead, both Obama and Joe Biden twiddled their thumbs and ended up with no position at all in Iraq. Not surprisingly, the vacuum left in western Iraq allowed al-Qaeda to regroup, and then attempt to destabilize both Iraq and Syria. Instead of stamping out the cancer, we let it metastasize again, this time more virulently than before.

That’s not to say that Kerry isn’t doing anything. He’s, er, inviting Iran to expand its influence in the region:

The Obama administration opened the door for the first time Sunday to Iranian participation at the Syrian peace talks in Switzerland later this month.

Softening the former hard line against any role for Iran if it refuses to endorse the Jan. 22 conference ground rules, Secretary of State John F. Kerry suggested that Iran might be able to participate from the sidelines.

“Could they contribute from the sidelines? Are there ways for them conceivably to weigh in?” Kerry said of the Iranians, who oppose the conference’s goal of establishing a transitional government in Syria, its ally and neighbor.

Kerry suggested that Iran’s diplomatic office in Geneva might be able to help as an unofficial participant.

Smart power.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Syria; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: almuthanna; alqaeda; alqaedainiraq; fallujah; iran; iraq; johnkerry; lebanon; lurch; muthanna; paleolibs; postwariraq; ramadi; soskerry; syria; waronterror; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 01/06/2014 8:22:21 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

allowing al quada to establish a safe haven for training and planning purposes is what led to 9/11 in the first place.

this seals it. we will see another attack, perhaps even more spectacular than 9/11.


2 posted on 01/06/2014 8:26:14 AM PST by JohnBrowdie (http://forum.stink-eye.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Public support for sending US troops to Iraq would be around 10 or 20%.

McCain, Grahamnesty, Bill Kristol, probably Cheney, ....only the neo-con club wants to go through that again.


3 posted on 01/06/2014 8:28:10 AM PST by sickoflibs (Obama : 'If you like your Doctor you can keep him, PERIOD! Don't believe the GOPs warnings')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"You know, education, if you make the most of it, if you study hard and you do your homework, and you make an effort to be smart, uh, you, you can do well. If you don’t, you get stuck in Iraq.". - Jon Effin' Kerry

Now, too busy being an ambassador for global homosexualization than to be concerned about Fallujah.

4 posted on 01/06/2014 8:29:17 AM PST by TADSLOS (The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Not our problem.

Muslims are animals and aren’t deserving of American blood being wasted.


5 posted on 01/06/2014 8:29:30 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS

Now, too busy being an ambassador for global homosexualization than to be concerned about Fallujah.

EXACTLY what I was thinking.


6 posted on 01/06/2014 8:33:12 AM PST by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Why would we attack them when they are helping us in Syria? Or vice versa, whatever.


7 posted on 01/06/2014 8:41:52 AM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; All
Well, some people are actually forgetting that it was Maliki and the Iraqis themselves who were demanding that our troops get out. We did, and so let the Iraqis reap what they sewed. Screw 'em.

Maliki Demands All U.S. Troops Pull Out by 2011

8 posted on 01/06/2014 8:51:31 AM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
... he made it clear that no American troops would be sent in.

What? Is he now Commander-in-Chief too?

9 posted on 01/06/2014 8:52:50 AM PST by JohnG45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

We all knew this would happen. Now Iraq will have to figure it out without us.


10 posted on 01/06/2014 8:59:03 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie
It will be a while before the entire Middle East is taken over by the radical Muslims. Attacking Saddam was part of that plan. We needed him out of there so that Iraq could become a hotbed of radical jihad, not just a dictatorship.

Our troops will be back in the Middle East once the jihadi takeover is accomplished. Then, we can be shocked, SHOCKED I TELL YOU, that this area poses a threat to Freedom (cue "The Battle Hymn of the Republic") around the globe.

It's time for World War III!!! (Corporate defense contractors all cheer at this point)

11 posted on 01/06/2014 8:59:31 AM PST by Dr. Thorne ("How long, O Lord, holy and true?" - Rev. 6:10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There is an old saying that”Afghanistan is the place where big nations go to die.” That is not only true but also includes pretty much all if the Middle East. These tribal nations have no understanding of truly representative government and little or no desire to live within its confines. There has been almost constant war or invasion since 5000 B.C. in most of that region. Who in hell are we to think that sort of history can be reversed? Drill our own oil and tell them to shove theirs back where the sun don’t shine.


12 posted on 01/06/2014 9:00:23 AM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnG45

No, mac daddy tell horse face what to say therefore when the shi* hits the fan mac daddy can once again say he knew nothing about what was going on and only found out about it from the nws today.


13 posted on 01/06/2014 9:13:46 AM PST by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

The only true friends we have in the mideast is Israel. I also include Jordan but that’s only true for as long as Abdulla lives. I suppose we could also include Egypt for as long as we continue to pay them.

Personally I would quit screwing around with troops and money in the mideast and park a carrier group in the eastern Mediterranean and make a solid trade and defense pact with Israel.


14 posted on 01/06/2014 9:17:09 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Obama’s friends and allies have taken what we gave lives and wealth to capture. Of course we won’t do anything to stop them. Little Obama is probably giddy.


15 posted on 01/06/2014 9:18:31 AM PST by FreeAtlanta (Liberty or Big Government - you can't have both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

RE: These tribal nations have no understanding of truly representative government and little or no desire to live within its confines. There has been almost constant war or invasion since 5000 B.C. in most of that region.

__________________________________________________________________________________

Remember our original rationale for going to Afghanistan?

It was to get Osama Bin Ladin. DONE.

It was also to drive Al Qaeda and the Taliban away from Afghanistan. NOT DONE.

Maybe we might just want to forget the second goal... well what’s to stop the next Bin Ladin from taking over the place and recreating another 9/11 if we leave the place?

We might not be interested in war, but war is interested in us.


16 posted on 01/06/2014 9:25:17 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie
So many of our best young people lost in vain to another useless war.

Where do we stand on THAT tally ?

Or does it really matter ?

17 posted on 01/06/2014 10:02:34 AM PST by onona (The Earth is the insane asylum for the universe (yup, I belong))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
We might not be interested in war, but war is interested in us.

Then lets secure our borders and stop importing people who want to kill us.
18 posted on 01/06/2014 10:06:17 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
Public support for sending US troops to Iraq would be around 10 or 20%

I think you badly overestimate the popularity of sending in troops.

19 posted on 01/06/2014 10:07:23 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
well what’s to stop the next Bin Ladin from taking over the place and recreating another 9/11 if we leave the place?

So

Your solution is to stay in Afghanistan for how long exactly? Until what happens?

The enemy center of gravity is in Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. Conquer there, and Afghanistan becomes meaningless.

Leave them in peace, and our sacrifices remain meaningless.

Your call.

20 posted on 01/06/2014 10:10:10 AM PST by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson