[JohnBrowdie]

yeah, we need all the sharron angles, christine o’donnells, todd akins, and richard mourdocks we can get, because God knows that worked out so well those other times. it’s brilliant to try to turn as many sure wins into losses that we can.

Someone please remind the amateurs that the media will be constantly trying to trip them up on abortion, and they had better get their answer straight, and stick to it.

[GeronL]

We need a GOP that doesn’t abandon their own candidates for actually supporting the party platform.

[Washi]

yeah, we need all the sharron angles, christine o’donnells, todd akins, and richard mourdocks we can get, because God knows that worked out so well those other times....

Water Carrier.

[what's up]

yeah, we need all the sharron angles, christine o’donnells, todd akins, and richard mourdocks we can get,

LOL!

[stormhill]

This is exemplary of the GOPe attitude: Victory is measured by election results not by policies enacted.
What exactly is the good in electing Republicans who govern like Democrats?

[erkelly]

Sharron Engle did actually win here in Nevada. She was the only candidate left standing after the primary by the way. The establishment candidates Brian (can't remember his last name) was thoroughly destroyed by Reid's minions in his run for secretary of state in the previous election, and had he won the primary, it would have been “deja vu all over again.” Nevada has had a huge growth in population so there were a lot of new voters who did not know about it, so they thought him a good choice, but he was not. The other candidate (also can't remember her name at the moment, sorry) was ruined by her statement about giving the doctor a chicken in exchange for his services. Granted it was taken somewhat out of context, but it was a stupid thing to say in the first place. Sharron presented as an intelligent and articulate candidate in her debate with Harry Reid, and he was a senile dithering inarticulate old fool. He only won because of massive massive vote fraud. Sharron went into the election several points ahead in the polls. If O'Donnell, etc., were half as good as Engle, then we conservatives, in fact, nominated a whole slate of good candidates who would have done a far better job representing us than the wishy-washy RINOs that conventional wisdom considers more electable. My apologies, I just have to disagree with you. I certainly used to think the way you do but I do not anymore. We need to draw the line, we are past the point where we elect the compromisers. A Rino who stands for nothing, who fails to take a stand, might as well be a democrat.

I hope this is readable, it's late, it just my thoughts, I'm dying of ovarian cancer with no hope of any more medical care, facing death, and I just see things in black and white these days. So, please, take a strong stand at every single point, and don't be afraid of losing. It is not possible to compromise any more.

[SeminoleCounty]

Sounds like you’re one of those liberal RINOs trying to sabotage conservatives

[Lazamataz]

yeah, we need all the sharron angles, christine o’donnells, todd akins, and richard mourdocks we can get

Yes, actually, we DO.

We need solid conservatives.

We also need to coach them better to make sure they perform under pressure. We need SKILLED versions of the people you mentioned. Ted Cruz springs to mind.