“...what kind of ‘family’ man doesn’t put his family on the work insurance policy?”
That’s the part I found most appalling. Before reading the story, I’d assumed she was a single mother. Might as well be. She could also think about getting a regular, salaried position that would cover her and with the joint income afford premiums for their child.
I do love these O voters getting gobsmacked by what they figured was only going to hurt others, i.e., those not in “HER situation.”
I’m guessing that the ‘husband’ isn’t really married to her and thus couldn’t put her on the policy. It is the only thing that I can fathom as an excuse for it.
Any job I ever took was predicated on the requirement that I could get health insurance for myself and my family. Money came second.
I guess liberals think somebody else ought to take care of that pesky need.
I don’t think they had a thought towards “hurting others”, just that “the rich”, who can easily afford it, would be footing the bill.
To them, it was all about the “free”.
““...what kind of ‘family’ man doesn’t put his family on the work insurance policy?”
The kind that works for a non-profit, which likely means some socialist community organizer group.
Agreed. The more pain they experience, the more likely it is that we will be able to get rid of it.