So domestic spying being legal is a good decision? Seems like it violates the Bill of Rights. Therefore any decision that violates the Bill of Rights is a bad decision.
Not just spying. They are passing information along to law enforcement who are lying to judges and defense attorneys about its source.
I’m assuming Rapscallion made a mistake. After reading many of his posts elsewhere on FR I have to think it’s a typo. If not I surely would like the reasoning behind “Good decision.”