Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Study On Homosexual Parents Tops All Previous Research (Must Have for Files)
Family Research Council ^ | Peter Sprigg

Posted on 12/26/2013 5:35:23 AM PST by xzins

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 last
To: xzins
If there are 1000 heterosexuals and 20 homosexuals (2%) in your town, and you live next door to a homosexual, are you more concerned that the gay guy living next to you is one of the 2 child molester gays or are you more concerned that the heterosexual living next to you is one of the 20 heterosexual molesters?

I'm going to size up the gay guy(s) living next door and get a feeling for what they are like. Do they give vibes that they could be pedophiles or do they seem rather safe in their behaviors and interests? As a parent, I'm going to treat all adults in the area as potential pedophiles until I know them better.

What I won't do is make the mistaken assumption that a neighbor is regarded dangerous or safe solely on their sexual preference. I'll take the percentages under advisement but I will be cognizant of the fact that some heteros are unsafe for children just as some homos are unsafe for children.

81 posted on 12/26/2013 7:49:20 PM PST by OrangeHoof (2001-2008: "Dissent Is Patriotism!" 2009-2016: "Dissent Is Racism!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: xzins

...compared to children raised by their married mother and father.

Is this a plug for legalizing gay marriage?


82 posted on 12/26/2013 7:50:17 PM PST by JouleZ (You are the company you keep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JouleZ
...compared to children raised by their married mother and father. -- Is this a plug for legalizing gay marriage?

Considering it comes out of UTex, there might be that suspicion. However, going with the "mother and father", I'd read it at face value and assume natural nuclear family.

83 posted on 12/27/2013 4:58:02 AM PST by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof

It certainly is true one must be vigilant, OHoof, but who would you rather the TSA profile at airports: caucasion Jewish grandmothers in wheelchairs or Islamic males with beards and prayer rugs?

I think profiling the homosexual next door makes you safer since he’s many times more likely to injure your child despite what you think you know about him.


84 posted on 12/27/2013 5:04:32 AM PST by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: madmominct
I am in the process of getting an MA in Counseling and this article may come in handy as a reference against the PC indoctrination I get.

Are you telling us that you actually expect to be *given* your diploma after having openly challenged that indoctrination? Or,if you're planning to openly challenge it only *after* graduation,do you really expect to be able to keep whatever license you might need to practice your craft?

If the latter is the case you might want to refer to the legislation recently enacted in California which forbids counselors/therapists from attempting to tell kids that they must see themselves as either male or female according to their X/Y chromosome makeup.

85 posted on 12/27/2013 9:39:53 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Osama Obama Care: A Religion That Will Have You On Your Knees!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: xzins

We’re just talking past each other.

I’m for profiling but not to the point where you become unconcerned about someone because they appear heterosexual or appear caucasian. The difference should be *extra* vigilence towards demographic groups known to be more inclined to certain unfavorable behaviors.

How safe would you have felt if Jerry Sandusky was one of your neighbors if all you knew was his public reputation?


86 posted on 12/27/2013 10:30:30 AM PST by OrangeHoof (2001-2008: "Dissent Is Patriotism!" 2009-2016: "Dissent Is Racism!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: xzins

How unsurprising in two respects: a) the ideological bias used to conduct all previous studies and b) the common-sense results.

Cue the homosexual agenda mafia in 3, 2, 1 ...


87 posted on 12/27/2013 10:42:19 AM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

bookmark


88 posted on 12/27/2013 10:56:18 AM PST by freehouse3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof
If 23% of children from lesbian mothers have been sexually abused then 77% were not. Such number-flipping makes the results less sensational than at first glance.

No, it doesn't. The study compared children of intact biological families to children of homosexuals.

Only 2% of children from married, heterosexual parents were sexually abused, where 98% were not. If you want to flip numbers, do it correctly.

98% of children from married, heterosexual parents were not sexually abused, but only 77% of children from lesbian mothers were not sexually abused. It's still just as shocking.

89 posted on 12/27/2013 11:15:59 AM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Children of lesbian mothers:

Are more likely to be currently cohabiting
Are almost 4 times more likely to be currently on public assistance
Are less likely to be currently employed full-time
Are more than 3 times more likely to be unemployed
Are nearly 4 times more likely to identify as something other than entirely heterosexual
Are 3 times as likely to have had an affair while married or cohabiting
Are an astonishing 10 times more likely to have been “touched sexually by a parent or other adult caregiver.”
Are nearly 4 times as likely to have been “physically forced” to have sex against their will
Are more likely to have “attachment” problems related to the ability to depend on others
Use marijuana more frequently
Smoke more frequently
Watch TV for long periods more frequently
Have more often pled guilty to a non-minor offense

Knowing several “G-Hey” people I can attest to that this seems to be quite accurate.


90 posted on 12/27/2013 1:35:12 PM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Girlene; AnonymousConservative

[ Is this study saying that a girl raised by either lesbians or gays has a 50-50 chance of being forced to have sex against her will as compared to 14% of those raised by an intact M/Female family?

That is stunning. ]

A very large percentage of Lesbians were abused Sexually by their Mothers or Fathers when they were little, this is just the cycle of abuse being embraced by society rather than being dealt with appropriately. I would wager that to find a Lesbian that had NOT been abused sexually in their youth would be as hard as finding a Lesbian who embraces conservative values. This sexual abuse causes mental breakdown in their emotional development and causes emotional development to stall and settle into a childlike state. This is one reason why the party of emotion (democrats) caters exclusively to the Gay agenda.

Sexual abuse is like a damned mind virus that propagates through the generations and continues onwards as if it has a life of it’s own. It is a lot like spousal abuse.

Imagine if wife/husband beating were normalized to this absurd point.... I am sure the democrats would cater to the spouse beating crowd... Oh wait... Bill Clintoon.....


91 posted on 12/27/2013 1:43:28 PM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Oy vey...I know. And curiously enough, I am considering moving to Calif next year - though I have serious reservations. It’s a fine line you have to walk in counseling - while you are “allowed” to have your own opinions and convictions, you are not to impose them on the client. You are supposed to honor the client’s autonomy at all times and never be judgmental...how this works in practice I’m not sure. Sometimes you may not be able to work with a certain client but you have to be careful about refusing to counsel certain types of clients. A common cautionary example used in my courses was the story of a Christian counselor who refused to counsel a lesbian couple on the basis that it violated her religious beliefs, but lost in court because she was not upholding the ethical principles of the counseling profession. Their rights to counseling trumped her right to her religious beliefs. The general consensus among my peers was that if she felt so strongly she should work for a Christian counseling center. Anyway - yes, it is a tough business in which to be a Christian and a conservative.


92 posted on 12/27/2013 4:58:52 PM PST by madmominct
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: xzins

In Chicago there’s a place on the southeast side called the SSCC. It used to be the South Shore Country Club and was mainly Jewish, but as the neighborhood changed the area went into decline. It’s now the South Shore Cultural Center, a kind of party/event place with a golf course and beach. The one other thing there is the mounted police stables of the CPD.

For decades the stables were open and relatively unguarded. You could go there with your kids and see the horses and it was a great visit, off the beaten track and totally unknown to most people. A couple years back somebody came in, tore the place up, damaged bridles, saddles and released the horses. Some of the horses were abused, really abused and weird stuff.

For a long time the crime went unsolved. It was outrageous, but there wasn’t enough evidence to find the culprit(s). Since then security has been beefed up and you can’t get in without a badge or prior authorization. Then suddenly there was a break in the case. Cops were called on a domestic between two lesbians. It was pretty hot and hostile, but the one says, “Do you know what her son did to those horses?”

They cracked the case from there.


93 posted on 12/27/2013 5:18:22 PM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof

I wouldn’t feel safe at all if Jerry Sandusky was a neighborhood, he’s one of the 1 in a hundred in your illustration, but he’s already identified.

If an unknown person from a known group that is 10% child molestive lives next door, then I’m more concerned than when it’s a person from a different group that’s 1 in 100.


94 posted on 12/27/2013 5:22:19 PM PST by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: xzins; RichInOC; Prince of Space; JoeFromSidney; TNMountainMan; alphadog; infool7; Heart-Rest; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.

95 posted on 12/27/2013 7:00:15 PM PST by narses (... unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you do not have life within you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

[cue Cole Porter, for oh so many reasons]

http://youtu.be/i6oGytt0Hiw


96 posted on 12/28/2013 2:12:51 PM PST by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

He has one. He’s just been deprived of him by two lesbians.


97 posted on 12/28/2013 6:23:56 PM PST by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: skinndogNN

“If I remember correctly, the liberals totally dismissed it, and chastised the author for being “unscientific”.”

One must remember the first law of dealing with liberals: all liberals lie all the time, even if they don’t realize it.


98 posted on 12/29/2013 10:06:42 PM PST by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: xzins

“Sucked in by liberal culture”: best phrasing to describe the Americaqn people I have seen lately.


99 posted on 01/01/2014 3:23:22 PM PST by Theodore R. (People in TX in 2014: Cornball and George P.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson