Posted on 12/24/2013 1:37:53 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
At the heart of the Duck Dynasty controversy is a modern paradox: those who most loudly celebrate the gay lifestyle seem to go into a Victorian swoon whenever anyone even obliquely mentions actual gay sex practices such as anal sex. As we watch the corporate clusterduck swirl around the alleged wrongs of reality TV star Phil Robertson concerning homosexuality, it may be instructive to take a step back.
Image control has been crucial to gay activists. In 1980 Hollywood produced, Cruising, a big budget film that showed the seamier side of gay life. It got pretty good reviews because it was edgy and well-acted. Gay activists denounced it as homophobic because it touched on two taboo subjects that interfered with promoting their agenda to the general public: sadomasochism and recruitment. Since then, any filmmaker who does not conform his gay characters to a positive and largely asexual template is likely to be criticized.....
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Homo Wedding Song:
"I'm walking behind you on your wedding day
And I'll hear you promise to love and obey
Though you may forget me, you're still on my mind
Look over your shoulder, I'm walking behind"
The cowardly libs know that you can saw what you wish about christians and we won’t cut your head off.
What an informative post - I shall keep that one!
Thanks
Mel
The homosexual lifestyle equates to the spread of hate, infectious and mental disease. It is all part of the homosexual derangement syndrome. Every mental case out there is completely sold on the notion that their disease is not a disease and everyone else is in the wrong.
When I was a student at UC Davis, some lesbian wrote a heartfelt letter to the editor about how she feels she deserves the right to marry her girlfriend.
Her family does not see her as normal, she explained. But if she could marry her girlfriend, her family would realize that she is just as normal as everyone else.
Nowhere in her letter did she speak of love and commitment. It was all about trying to appear normal in the eyes of her family. As I see it, she was engaged in a fair amount of self-delusion. Did she really think her family would suddenly decide her mental illness is normal, just because she gets legal permission to pretend to marry with a license and everything? Did it really never occur to her that her family thought she was abnormal because of her behavior, which has nothing to do with whether she possesses a specific legal document?
I’m afraid that based on their long-term voting records, the American people, particularly on the East and West coasts and the Great Lakes and FL, NM, and CO are fully committed to organized gaydom, and nothing will reverse them.
You may not understand than tens of millions of heterosexuals endorse organized gaydom. We could argue about the numbers and the reasons, but the American people are on board with liberalism full throttle. Notice how strongly liberals ran in elections held just last month, limited though the contests were.
Great line, but it means nothing to the American people.
I just ask, “How many stallions will let another stallion stuff himself up their rear? And if the answer is not ‘Lots’, then does this homosexual stuff violate natural law?””
FL actually passed a constitutional amendment which removed the issue from the judges hands.
Yea, because it’s totally disgusting if you even think about thinking about it.
Agreed. Hollywood is the marketer of deviance, but anyone that knows the scientific facts or has worked in public health knows the truth of the lifestyle.
Oh I heard a homo arguing the other day that some 200 species of animals have male on male sex. My answer is they are all hyped up because a female is on heat somewhere and they cannot get to her so they hump each other - they don’t actually penetrate or find each other sexually attractive - it’s a poor alternative for those who can’t get to a female!
They don’t really think just spout the same propaganda.
Here is an example of what is passed of as homosexual behavior in lions: “Male lions pair-bond for a number of days and initiate homosexual activity with affectionate nuzzling and caressing, leading to mounting and thrusting.”
Or, “Also, mounting of one female by another (known as “bulling”) is extremely common among cattle. The behaviour is hormone driven and synchronizes with the emergence of estrus (heat), particularly in the presence of a bull.”
They also use dogs mounting each other as evidence of homosexual behavior.
But is it dominance? Is it the equivalent of homosexuality in prisons, where there is lack of females? Is it hormonal driven?
What it generally is not (with very few exceptions) is males penetrating the anus of another male as preferable to sex with females....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual_behavior_in_animals
I think the census data shows that the percentage of gayness is quite near zero in Sodom these days.
Heck, my pet goats are very indiscriminate as to which gender is at the end of their noses when sniffing time occurs.
They also butt each other without regard to gender.
The girls will ‘bully’ each other more than the guys do!
Yes, yes they do.
I like very much how you put that, I’m going to use it in the future.
Muslims need to be answered by liberals.
I can’t get over how pithily perfect that really is.
Post of the day!
Indeed!
Jesus Christ: You can’t impeach Him and He ain’t going to resign.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.