Seriously? If the men had kept their member in their pants and not given into temptation or cheated on their wives what he called the women would be irrelevant. But I guess only women have poor morals in your book.
Indeed. It takes two to, er, tango.
Except in cases of rap, women have ultimate control, they can give in or say no.
I spent my entire high school off campus time trying to get into the pants of my long time girlfriend, and she spent four years telling me no. She won.
Of course this was back in the 60’s when being a slut was a bad thing, being a whore was a curse. To be with child without benefit of marriage was consider a sin.
Oh, the bad old days. Mayhap they were not such bad old days.
When women get pregnant-—it is usually because the women want to get pregnant or too drugged to care. (Their own fault). Also-—women who get raped are usually setting themselves up to get raped and they know it.
That is my experience and I have known women who got pregnant and gave their babies up for adoption.....cause the man wouldn’t marry them. Women have much more control over their sexual instincts than a man-—and that is the nature of man/woman.
There is a big difference-—unlike what the media is trying to portray-—that men and women are exactly the same and interchangeable.....it is such a lie-—like all they say and do. It is to blur the line “for the children” for a Marxist/homosexual worldview (erasing of Christian Ethics by the God is Dead crowd.)
Now-—I am talking about a culture without those hordes of raping muslims like Europe has........those cultures are no longer civil societies. In those places, women need to be armed and trained for self defense——and that goes here too, when they go into the inner godless cities which the Democrats turned into hell holes.
Focusing on men is useless. It only takes one man to impregnate dozens of women. The problem can only be fixed by changing womens attitudes.