Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Got that?
1 posted on 12/22/2013 11:28:55 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet

This stupidity is never going to end is it?


2 posted on 12/22/2013 11:31:14 PM PST by Wanderer99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The soul-corruption runs deep.

Once you’ve lost the ability to distinguish right from wrong, good from evil, up from down, the simple text of a law or constitution loses its meaning as well.

There is no rule of law separate from the moral foundation it must rest upon.


4 posted on 12/22/2013 11:35:09 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; John Semmens

I was looking for the John Semmens byline.


6 posted on 12/22/2013 11:46:24 PM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
This right is deeply rooted in the nation’s history and implicit in the concept of ordered liberty because it protects an individual’s ability to make deeply personal choices about love and family free from government interference.

The irony is lost on this stupid bastard.

7 posted on 12/22/2013 11:47:02 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (Play the 'Knockout Game' with someone owning a 9mm and you get what you deserve)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Obama-appointed judge: Same-sex marriage like interracial, ‘deeply rooted in nation’s history

No, it's only deeply rooted in his anus.

No amount of indoctrination can overcome the "gag instinct" that comes naturally following this statement.

Therein lies the problem for the democrats with this whole farcical argument.

11 posted on 12/23/2013 3:35:43 AM PST by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Some people believe it is a sin. Sorry.

Next: polygamy.

Next: Incest.

The list is long.


12 posted on 12/23/2013 3:40:13 AM PST by Baldwin77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“This right is deeply rooted in the nation’s history and implicit in the concept of ordered liberty because it protects an individual’s ability to make deeply personal choices about love and family free from government interference.”

Ok...such bs.

Since the judge seems to depend on this “logic” as a core underpinning of his decision, can that be attacked in an appeal?
Its fairly obvious that homosexuality was never a thought to the founders nor in their wildest dreams a right.
Also, the fact that there are marriage laws at all IS a government interference...Should we just not have any laws about it, then?

Hmmmm....


13 posted on 12/23/2013 4:34:48 AM PST by Adder (No, Mr. Franklin, we could NOT keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’m guesssing here that the Constitution of the United States of America never came into play in determining whether the law was Constitutional.


15 posted on 12/23/2013 4:56:37 AM PST by Hoodat (Democrats - Opposing Equal Protection since 1828)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

What is deeply rooted in America is the utter stupidity and ignorance of most federal judges.


16 posted on 12/23/2013 4:57:58 AM PST by armydawg505
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; Wanderer99
ask the court to hold that the State cannot prohibit them from exercising their existing right to marry on account of the sex of their chosen partner.

I've said before on this website, and I'm beginning to think I can git 'r done now - I'm going to find a cat that some crazy cat lady left $10 million to, and "ask the court to hold that the State cannot prohibit them from exercising their existing right to marry on account of the sex species of their chosen partner".

Who are you to question my love?

I am quite sure that the cat will be struck with a sudden illness and I will be a rich, broken hearted survivor of the world's first inter species marriage. I will be a pioneer, and will have done well by doing good, as liberals always say. Note that I only changed one word in the article's language.

Reductio ad absurdum (fancy language for /sarc)

18 posted on 12/23/2013 5:14:43 AM PST by Hardastarboard (The question of our age is whether a majority of Americans can and will vote us all into slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Why is this judge not walking down an isolated road dressed in nothing but tar and feathers!


20 posted on 12/23/2013 7:33:04 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Sometimes you need 7+ more ammo. LOTS MORE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This is the key error that runs all over our courts:

“To establish a new fundamental right, the court must determine that the right is ‘deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition’ and ‘implicit in the concept of ordered liberty,”

by this error, that believes that mere “legal argument” held to certain standards, for the formulation of amending the Constitution via the concept of the “living constitution” is sufficient for establishing new “rights” that WE THE PEOPLE, the ONLY legitimate authors of our Constitutions, via our elected reprsentatives, have in fact NOT authored or approved our Constitution to contain.

We need an en masse impeachment of all such subversive judges.

How do they come to exist.

The above desrciption of how they think is very often how they are taught to think in our law schools.

To correct the judge’s error, the judicial thinking on “rights” should be ““To recognize a fundamental right, the court must determine that the right has been placed in the Constitution by acts of the people.”


21 posted on 12/23/2013 9:37:15 AM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“deeply rooted in the nation’s history and implicit in the concept of ordered liberty,” and as such is a fundamental right”

deeply rooted in the nation’s histroy?? phooey. the guy is nuts

and even if there was a shred of evidence for “implicit in the concept of ordered Liberty”, it remains up to the people, not the courts, to establish how and to what end a Liberty is recognized in law, or not.


22 posted on 12/23/2013 9:41:54 AM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Not according to God!


23 posted on 12/23/2013 9:53:01 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Marriage=One Man and One Woman 'Til Death Do Us Part


24 posted on 12/23/2013 9:53:31 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
... ‘neither liberty nor justice would exist if [it] were sacrificed...

Is he claiming that since there's been no right to "homosexual marriage" during the nearly-quarter-millenium of this nation's history, we've had neither liberty nor justice prior to this?

25 posted on 12/23/2013 10:43:11 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

IOW he believes the “born that way” myth.

behavior is immutable as skin color or needing a lung.

I wonder about his life.

Time to start closing law schools.

there is no reason for any state run law schools these days.


26 posted on 12/23/2013 4:48:48 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson