Posted on 12/17/2013 10:50:25 AM PST by blueyon
MSNBC host says newborn infants don’t count as ‘alive’ unless parents decide they do; infanticide is the new abortion Today Natural News denounces Melissa Harris-Perry, the latest talking head “death worshipper” to publicly imply that she supports the murder of living, breathing newborn children. According to Harris-Perry, life begins when the parents feel like life begins. And together with some twisted new “ethics” arguments from the radical left, this can include months or years after a child is born.
That’s why I need to premise this article with a disclaimer: This article is not about abortion. It’s about the murder of children after they are born. Because once a child is born alive, terminating that life is no longer a “choice” … it’s murder by every legal and moral standard. Because while abortion friends and foes can argue about when life begins in the womb, no one disagrees that a child born alive is, well, ALIVE… do they?
Indeed, they do. MSNBC talking head Melissa Harris-Perry insists that life only begins when the parents have a “feeling” that it begins. “When does life begin? I submit the answer depends an awful lot on the feeling of the parents. A powerful feeling — but not science,” Harris-Perry said to nationwide astonishment on her July 21 MSNBC show.
(Excerpt) Read more at realnews24.com ...
I will not be goaded into railing about Melissa Harris-Perry. This person is a crank, a crackpot.
In Internet parlance, she’s a troll.
I don’t understand why anyone would pay any mind to this nut case any more than they would pay heed to some person who is found mumbling to himself on the street.
Whatever, Melissa. You keep trying to garner attention for yourself with your unbalanced shrill comments.
Oh, and we’re not laughing with you, we’re laughing at you.
Yes...this is true what she said. There is no end to the evil of the left.
Sometimes back I read an article by some pinheaded academics over in Australia (I think)spewing this same point but with a twist. Termination could happen up to an age where the the child was considered to be “aware”....
No group attacks children like the left. Thats why I consider libs/progressives pure EVIL
You said...
“Remember, Perry’s whole schtick is to say the most outrageous, offensive things possible so people will write about her on the web. She knows she has no audience on MSNBC so it’s the only attention she can get. This is all very calculated and she is best ignored.”
A while back, Limbaugh joked that ever since he quit mentioning or playing any soundbites from MSNBC, their ratings tanked further. SThis is what this Perry is attempting to do. Say the most outrageous things and get noticed and many here are giving her and MSNBC what they desire...attention. MSNBC appeals to not to simply the LIV. It’s made to appeal to the most extreme of the left
Evil. Pure evil.
That's how I feel about liberals. Especially talking head liberals.
This is totally consistent with her religion of humanism -
she’s deciding good and evil for herself and saying others should as well...
So, how far down the road, with this logic, is the idea that the Ubermensch should be able to decide the fates of the Untermensch?
Another woman who couldn’t decide between keeping her father’s name or her husband’s name,
so tied herself to both.
She must hang out with Peter Singer.
“A powerful feeling - not science” Let’s see a capitalist or a conservative libertarian or conservative Christian of any denomination try and get away with saying that on the air about ANYTHING and see what happens.
Probably good for her that her mother didn’t feel the same way.
It is not a satire site.
Next: The Pope will tell us we are talking too much about infanticide. Cardinal Wuerl will give Melissa Harris-Perry Communion.
Actually, I don’t even think that she gets that far down on the ‘human’ scale. Liberal dogma REQUIRES absolute obedience to all things Democrat, Progressive, and morally rabid. She’s just protecting the number one bastion of liberal irrational thought, the sacrosanct Planned Parenthood and its aftermath.
I would be willing to be a smart debater like Ted Cruz could back her into a philosophical argument where she would have to agree that even her own mother could call for her ‘abortion’ even now. Ignorant bitch.
I assumed is was a satire site but I did not see any satire.
You’re not alone, blueyon. Again and again when I happen upon Marxist sites, I start to smile and shake my head in amazement at the satire, only to realize people actually believe the malicious, idiotic, utterly ludicrous stuff they say.
They live in fantasy land where they think they can will themselves to fly like in Twighlight, ergo they think anything they say will magically happen. What a spoiled, sick generation the indoctrinators have raised.
Not to be confused with the friendly palling around N-Word-A.
Did not professor Peter Singer (Princeton) advocate this? Isn’t he a prof. of bioethics?
She has an impressive CV. With incalculable stupidity such as this outline describes, I can only conclude her entire recorded accomplishments are belied by preferential treatment. No doubt a recipient of AA advancement.
Did you notice that she rejected any scientific definition in favor of the “strong feelings” of the parents?
Because she’s probably already been backed into a corner with some version of the SLED argument, showing that there is no scientific or logical difference between the unborn and the just born that doesn’t equally exist between a newborn and an adult.
That the leftmedia pays far more attention to Kelly's innocuous comment than they will to the MSNBC commentators outrageous assertion related to aborting living babies is typical but also frustrating.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.