Posted on 12/12/2013 4:51:01 PM PST by george76
This is born out by the habitat folks hand in hand with the federal government, confiscating land on a whim.
I object to massive land holdings that dictate to the public what they can and can’t do in certain areas.
Simple preservation actually disgusts me.
Imagine if our grandparents and great-grandparents generation had locked up all the land in areas like Los Angeles or other large metropolitan areas.
I had surmised this because of Crespi's 1774 accounts of how happy the Indians were when the Spanish shot a griz. I suggested that their insularity (because of the lack of summer water) had coastal mountain tribes he encountered less susceptible to the dispersion of a fast acting crowd disease like smallpox than were the tribes farther to the east and that therefore Crespi's account was more redolent of pre-Columbian conditions than is commonly supposed. He said that was a legitimate hypothesis that no one had proposed.
Not exactly correct. The term in Genesis 1:28 to which you refer is "u'redu." Usually translated as "take dominion," the term derives from the way that shepherds defined their territories by treading down the grass. In fact, it is the phonetic root for your back "yard." More literally, it implies taking possession AND responsibility for every bird, fish, and herding animal (all of which are kosher but for raptors) within a defined area. It is the first commandment to man, a commitment to stewardship through private property.
Yeah, I know. But that's why you read my posts! :-) Maybe someday you'll take on the book.
Greasy meat from what I've heard. But it taint bad if you're an Indian. :-)
Interesting theory and comments there. Thanks.
Heh heh heh...
I should shouldn’t I. ;^)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.