Skip to comments.
MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow to write Washington Post column
WaPo ^
| 12/11/13
| ERIK WEMPLE
Posted on 12/11/2013 9:09:18 AM PST by Clint N. Suhks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Who knew the WaPo could move any further left?
To: Clint N. Suhks
Will she wear tampons as earrings? Oh wait, that is another “journalist” from MSDNC.
2
posted on
12/11/2013 9:12:00 AM PST
by
Red in Blue PA
(When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
To: Clint N. Suhks
They’re just looking for the Democrat Man’s point of view. So few of WaPo’s supposedly male journalists actually have a pair, they decided to get a real man with a pair.
3
posted on
12/11/2013 9:12:16 AM PST
by
Gaffer
To: Clint N. Suhks
Let me guess - they’re after her conservative point of view, right?
To: Clint N. Suhks
It won’t matter to me who the Washington Post hires I don’t read their tripe anyway.
5
posted on
12/11/2013 9:19:57 AM PST
by
Venturer
(Half Staff the Flag of the US for Terrorists.)
To: Clint N. Suhks
I can’t stand that guy Maddow!!
To: Clint N. Suhks
Who knew MSNBC had any show that won an Emmy?
7
posted on
12/11/2013 9:20:34 AM PST
by
griswold3
(Post-Christian America is living on borrowed moral heritage)
To: Clint N. Suhks
Now people can wipe their @$$ with her biased column.
8
posted on
12/11/2013 9:20:44 AM PST
by
Farnsworth
(Now playing in America: "Stupid is the new normal")
To: Clint N. Suhks
Is this an example of HOW Bezo (Amazon.Com) is going to run his paper?
9
posted on
12/11/2013 9:23:00 AM PST
by
56newblog
(Registered Islamophobe)
To: griswold3
Who knew MSNBC had any show that won an Emmy? The Emmy's are just a Hollywood limousine liberal circle jerk.
To: Clint N. Suhks
Washington Post hires infinite amount of monkeys and some lady...film at 11.
11
posted on
12/11/2013 9:25:38 AM PST
by
mindburglar
(Karl Rove will call Ted Cruz a "white hispanic".)
To: Clint N. Suhks
Post Editorial Page Editor Fred Hiatt must be Bi....or just plain stupid. This will link up a failing Leftist newspaper with a failing Leftist network. Brilliant.
To: Clint N. Suhks
I wouldn’t buy anything from amazon.commie if you paid me to.
To: Clint N. Suhks
The girly boy is literate?
I am shocked
14
posted on
12/11/2013 9:31:48 AM PST
by
GeronL
(Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
To: Clint N. Suhks
Rachel Maddow's strong on 'attitude' and being fashionable.
But if you write down what she's saying - minus the glitz and eye rolls - it's very ordinary. I won't try to second guess the Washington Post - after all they're an amazingly successful newspaper.../s But I hope they're read her clips.
15
posted on
12/11/2013 9:33:01 AM PST
by
GOPJ
("Remember who the real enemy is... ")
To: Clint N. Suhks
Perhaps she’s thinking of having children and is tiring of the stress of broadcast journalism. Or the WaPo is hopelessly stupid. Why would any decent person want to subscribe or advertise in it. Just another crappy Democratic broadsheet.
To: Clint N. Suhks
I was recently in Washington DC and passed the WaPo headquarters daily. They have a news ticker that runs across their building. Every day, or nearly every day, the public news ticker carried some story about homosexuals. I thought it was more than odd that their was this prurient interest in homosexual matters, then I realized that this is the foundation upon which the WaPo’s "news" perspective rests.
17
posted on
12/11/2013 9:42:12 AM PST
by
Obadiah
(I Like Ted.)
To: Clint N. Suhks
“strong arguments, sharp wit and thoughtful analysis”
Oh, yes, indeedy!
18
posted on
12/11/2013 9:42:38 AM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Clint N. Suhks
Next she’ll get an endowed chair at Harvard.
19
posted on
12/11/2013 9:43:12 AM PST
by
Steely Tom
(If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
To: GOPJ
Try to imagine Walter Cronkite doing the news with the same smirks, eye rolls, and condescending attitude shown by that guy Maddow on his show
20
posted on
12/11/2013 9:46:44 AM PST
by
Mr. K
(If you like your constitution, you can keep it. Period.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson