Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu
Had anyone bothered to read the article, they would see that these changes are actually a positive move for conservative candidates.

-- Any state holding a primary or caucus during the first two weeks of March must award its delegates proportionally, rather than winner-take-all.

The measure is designed to prevent a candidate from catching fire in the early states and then riding a burst of momentum to winner-take-all victories in expensive, delegate-rich states such as Florida or Texas. The early March window would give underfunded, insurgent candidates a chance to prove their mettle.

"It will allow a grassroots candidate to stay in the race and try to raise money and score some wins," said Smack. "If they can't score wins by that time, they probably need to pack it in and try again four years later."

32 posted on 12/11/2013 9:41:36 AM PST by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: meadsjn

Not if we don’t have any running.


33 posted on 12/11/2013 9:43:11 AM PST by discostu (This is Jack Burton in the Pork Chop Express, and I'm talkin' to whoever's listenin' out there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: meadsjn
-- Any state holding a primary or caucus during the first two weeks of March must award its delegates proportionally, rather than winner-take-all.

All states should have the same rules. If they are splitting delegates for early state, they should do it for all states.
49 posted on 12/11/2013 10:30:16 AM PST by TomGuy (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson