Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Familiy files lawsuit against gunmaker in teen's death
Fayetteville Observer ^ | December 10, 2013 | Deuce Niven

Posted on 12/10/2013 4:53:08 AM PST by DJ Taylor

The family of a Charlotte teenager who was shot and killed outside a Chadbourn home in December 2011 has filed a lawsuit against the manufacturer of the weapon.

Jasmin Thar, 16, died after being shot Dec. 23, 2011, while standing outside a relative's home. Two other women were injured by the same bullet.

The lawsuit was filed Monday in Mecklenburg County Superior Court. It is seeking damages from Remington, the maker of the Model 700 rifle that fired from inside a neighbor's home, killing the teenager.

(Excerpt) Read more at fayobserver.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: guns
"...posted on Remington's website, the company was critical of the gun's critics, and said the gun was safe "despite emotional reporting of baseless and unproven allegations and plaintiff lawyer assertions...

"The Model 700, including its trigger mechanism, has been free of any defect since it was first produced and, despite any careless reporting to the contrary, the gun's use by millions of Americans has proven it to be a safe, trusted and reliable rifle."

IMHO, Remington won't dare to let this go before a jury and will settle out of court.

1 posted on 12/10/2013 4:53:08 AM PST by DJ Taylor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DJ Taylor

... so “guns” now have a life of their own and fire whenever they feel like it? Did no one pull the trigger? Did no one aim the rifle?


2 posted on 12/10/2013 4:57:14 AM PST by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ Taylor

No they will not. That’s economic suicide to let it be known they can be extorted by lies. Every case of this nature prior the extortionists has lost. You do not stay in business long setting the precedent that your product is inherently dangerous


3 posted on 12/10/2013 4:58:02 AM PST by Mechanicos (When did we amend the Constitution for a 2nd Federal Prohibition?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken522

Just like the suv. It just drives where it wants and hits what and whom it desires.


4 posted on 12/10/2013 4:59:03 AM PST by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DJ Taylor

The same logic should have put all car manufacturers out of business a LOOOOOONG time ago........


5 posted on 12/10/2013 5:04:14 AM PST by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken522

The UNLOADED gun fired itself, taking aim at three victims across the street.


6 posted on 12/10/2013 5:05:24 AM PST by gitmo (If your theology doesn't become your biography, it's useless. huh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DJ Taylor

More kids drown than are killed by guns so when will they sue God for making water?


7 posted on 12/10/2013 5:15:33 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ Taylor

lol

She have better luck suing the builder of the house for building such sub-standard walls.


8 posted on 12/10/2013 5:20:47 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied .. the economy died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ Taylor

Remington will fight it. They have to. Cutting a deal would open them up to additional extortion efforts in the future. This has been tried before time and time again and has never worked. Remington will win.


9 posted on 12/10/2013 5:32:10 AM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ Taylor

This reminds me of when NBC set bombs in trucks to demonstrate that they spontaneously burst into flames.


10 posted on 12/10/2013 5:35:10 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Who knew that one day professional wrestling would be less fake than professional journalism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ Taylor

I believe there is already a Federal Law covering this sort of thing.

It’s like with ladders, post enough warning stickers and messages and you’re covered against accidents and idiots.


11 posted on 12/10/2013 5:36:19 AM PST by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ Taylor

Remington failed its responsibility to make only safe bullets. Yes?


12 posted on 12/10/2013 5:39:11 AM PST by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINEhttp://steshaw.org/economics-in-one-lesson/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ Taylor
IMHO, Remington won't dare to let this go before a jury and will settle out of court.

If they settle then a week later they'll be faced with a thousand similar lawsuits. They don't have a choice but to fight this one and win.

13 posted on 12/10/2013 5:45:24 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ Taylor

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remington_Model_700#Misfiring_Controversy


14 posted on 12/10/2013 5:52:47 AM PST by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ Taylor
He told police his high-powered rifle discharged accidentally, and that his finger was not on the trigger of the weapon he believed to be unloaded, the initial police report said. In April, District Attorney Jon David ruled the death "was the result of an accidental discharge for which criminal charges are not possible."

This is a known Remington defect. While my own Remington 700 has never fired itself, even when loaded, over the 40 years I have owned it, many of those rifles have fired despite being unloaded and not having a finger on the trigger. That's why I was happy when mine was lost in the Great Boating Accident of 2012 - I finally felt safe from that dreadful danger.

15 posted on 12/10/2013 6:09:16 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6
Claiming a couple of dozen deaths in 65 years?!!! Poor and unsafe handling of a firearm, IMHO.

Car makers should be out of business, using CNBC's logic!

16 posted on 12/10/2013 6:11:15 AM PST by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DJ Taylor
I have my fathers 700, I've taken it Muskox hunting in Alaska,elk in Wyoming,hogs in Ga. I have fired hundreds of rounds with it, I've cleaned it probably thousands of times.
This rifle has NEVER discharged without e willing it to.
Poor gun safety is the cause of these AD’s..
1st lesson the old man taught me was Check to see if it's unloaded before doing ANYTHING with the weapon
17 posted on 12/10/2013 6:19:26 AM PST by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robe

I, too, owned a Model 700 before another Tragic Boating Accident. It had a single stage trigger with a really light, crisp pull, making it a joy to shoot. That also made it, and every one like it, capable of discharging quite easily if carelessly handled.


18 posted on 12/10/2013 6:46:04 AM PST by libstripper (Asv)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DJ Taylor

I know there are mad dog supporters of the model 700 here on F.R. That is fine with me, as for me a Ruger model 77 is by fare a better weapon. Plus Ruger will recall a weapon so fast it will make your head swim. Have had 3 of there weapon that were recalled 1. Bearcat .22 2. Mark 1 .22 3. P-85 9mm. You could say that’s a lot of recalls in 40 years but I say good on you Ruger. Have not seen the recall on the Remington 700 yet. As I’ve sold all these weapons I feel good that they were in good order and safe.


19 posted on 12/10/2013 6:46:36 AM PST by lostboy61 (Lock and Load and stand your ground!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lostboy61

all it takes is yet another unworthy judge to disregard the law.


20 posted on 12/10/2013 6:51:55 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson